传统会改变吗?:神与人历史中的真理

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Michael Quisinsky
{"title":"传统会改变吗?:神与人历史中的真理","authors":"Michael Quisinsky","doi":"10.2143/ETL.86.1.2051612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In search of responses to the question whether Tradition can (not) change, a promising research avenue could be to consider Tradition from within a vision of truth which is a relationship between God and Humanity in history. Vatican II, conceived as a part and expression of the living Tradition, can be conceived as a signpost for this research. This favors a topological structure for theology, considering the different loci theologici. To explore further the modes and the dynamic of their interconnections, some challenges made by the post-Vatican II category of \"interruption\" are explored. A central topic is a critical evaluation of the question as to whether it is sufficient to \"charge\" the category of \"interruption\" with \"Incarnation\". The question thereby arises as to whether or not it would be necessary rather to consider an interconnectedness of the notions of \"interruption\" and \"Salvation History\". In search of an epistemology which is able to conceive of truth in its historical complexity, the \"differentiated consensus\" promises to give an important inspiration for further researches dealing with the question whether Tradition can (not) change. Since quests for truth in statu viae are in itself part of the history between God and Humanity, some concluding remarks concern the eschatological dynamic of the interconnection of Christian truth-claims as a constitutive dimension of a Tradition housed in its multiple dimensions.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"76 1","pages":"107-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Tradition (Not) Change?: Truth in the History between God and Humanity\",\"authors\":\"Michael Quisinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ETL.86.1.2051612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In search of responses to the question whether Tradition can (not) change, a promising research avenue could be to consider Tradition from within a vision of truth which is a relationship between God and Humanity in history. Vatican II, conceived as a part and expression of the living Tradition, can be conceived as a signpost for this research. This favors a topological structure for theology, considering the different loci theologici. To explore further the modes and the dynamic of their interconnections, some challenges made by the post-Vatican II category of \\\"interruption\\\" are explored. A central topic is a critical evaluation of the question as to whether it is sufficient to \\\"charge\\\" the category of \\\"interruption\\\" with \\\"Incarnation\\\". The question thereby arises as to whether or not it would be necessary rather to consider an interconnectedness of the notions of \\\"interruption\\\" and \\\"Salvation History\\\". In search of an epistemology which is able to conceive of truth in its historical complexity, the \\\"differentiated consensus\\\" promises to give an important inspiration for further researches dealing with the question whether Tradition can (not) change. Since quests for truth in statu viae are in itself part of the history between God and Humanity, some concluding remarks concern the eschatological dynamic of the interconnection of Christian truth-claims as a constitutive dimension of a Tradition housed in its multiple dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"107-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.86.1.2051612\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.86.1.2051612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了寻找传统是否会改变的答案,一个有希望的研究途径可能是从真理的视角来考虑传统,即历史上上帝与人类之间的关系。梵蒂冈第二次会议被认为是活传统的一部分和表达,可以被认为是这项研究的一个路标。考虑到不同的神学位置,这有利于神学的拓扑结构。为了进一步探讨它们相互联系的模式和动态,本文探讨了梵二之后的“中断”范畴所带来的一些挑战。一个中心议题是对是否足以用“化身”来“指控”“中断”类别的问题进行批判性评价。由此产生的问题是,是否有必要考虑“中断”和“救赎历史”概念之间的相互联系。在寻找一种能够在其历史复杂性中理解真理的认识论时,“差异共识”有望为进一步研究传统是否能够(不)改变的问题提供重要的启示。既然在现实中寻求真理本身就是上帝与人类之间历史的一部分,一些结束语涉及基督教真理主张相互联系的末世论动态,作为一个传统的构成维度,它被置于其多个维度中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Tradition (Not) Change?: Truth in the History between God and Humanity
In search of responses to the question whether Tradition can (not) change, a promising research avenue could be to consider Tradition from within a vision of truth which is a relationship between God and Humanity in history. Vatican II, conceived as a part and expression of the living Tradition, can be conceived as a signpost for this research. This favors a topological structure for theology, considering the different loci theologici. To explore further the modes and the dynamic of their interconnections, some challenges made by the post-Vatican II category of "interruption" are explored. A central topic is a critical evaluation of the question as to whether it is sufficient to "charge" the category of "interruption" with "Incarnation". The question thereby arises as to whether or not it would be necessary rather to consider an interconnectedness of the notions of "interruption" and "Salvation History". In search of an epistemology which is able to conceive of truth in its historical complexity, the "differentiated consensus" promises to give an important inspiration for further researches dealing with the question whether Tradition can (not) change. Since quests for truth in statu viae are in itself part of the history between God and Humanity, some concluding remarks concern the eschatological dynamic of the interconnection of Christian truth-claims as a constitutive dimension of a Tradition housed in its multiple dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (ETL), founded in 1924, is a quarterly publication by professors of Theology and Canon Law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve). Each volume totals ca. 1300 pages. Issues 1 (April) and 4 (December) contain articles, book reviews and chronicles in various languages (English, French, German). Issue 2-3 (September) represents the annual Elenchus Bibliographicus, an extensive bibliography of books and articles that appeared during the preceding year. The bibliography (ca. 15,000 entries) covers the entire field of Theology and Canon Law: History of Theology, History of Religions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信