政治场域与权力区域:理想类型的多样性与实证验证

I. Nedyak, T. V. Pavlova, S. Patrushev, L. Philippova
{"title":"政治场域与权力区域:理想类型的多样性与实证验证","authors":"I. Nedyak, T. V. Pavlova, S. Patrushev, L. Philippova","doi":"10.31857/S013216250008323-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, the concepts “political field” and “zone of power” are analyzed in order to evaluate their applicability to the sociologacal study of conditions for emergence of modern-type politics in Russia – based on goal-setting and competition. The attempted conceptualization was based on neoinstitutional, deliberative and neo-republican approaches. Models developed by the authors were verified using the data of a 2018 nationwide representative population survey. It is demonstrated that, according to different understanding of rules and their role in politics, political sphere in Russia is precieved either as a closed and deformalized zone of power or as an open political field. These perceptions influence how the possibility of interests’ realization in politics is assessed and how attitudes towards participation are formed. The approaches used in the article also help to reveal how the zone of power can potentially be transformed into political field.","PeriodicalId":85741,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of sociological studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"42-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Field and Zone of Power: Ideal Type Varieties and an Empirical Verification\",\"authors\":\"I. Nedyak, T. V. Pavlova, S. Patrushev, L. Philippova\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/S013216250008323-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article, the concepts “political field” and “zone of power” are analyzed in order to evaluate their applicability to the sociologacal study of conditions for emergence of modern-type politics in Russia – based on goal-setting and competition. The attempted conceptualization was based on neoinstitutional, deliberative and neo-republican approaches. Models developed by the authors were verified using the data of a 2018 nationwide representative population survey. It is demonstrated that, according to different understanding of rules and their role in politics, political sphere in Russia is precieved either as a closed and deformalized zone of power or as an open political field. These perceptions influence how the possibility of interests’ realization in politics is assessed and how attitudes towards participation are formed. The approaches used in the article also help to reveal how the zone of power can potentially be transformed into political field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of sociological studies\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"42-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of sociological studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250008323-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of sociological studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250008323-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对“政治场域”和“权力区域”这两个概念进行了分析,以评价它们在以目标设定和竞争为基础的俄罗斯现代政治产生条件的社会学研究中的适用性。概念化的尝试是基于新制度的、协商的和新共和主义的方法。作者开发的模型使用2018年全国代表性人口调查的数据进行了验证。研究表明,根据对规则及其在政治中的作用的不同理解,俄罗斯的政治领域要么被视为一个封闭的、非规范化的权力区域,要么被视为一个开放的政治领域。这些观念影响如何评估利益在政治中实现的可能性,以及如何形成对参与的态度。本文使用的方法也有助于揭示权力区域如何潜在地转变为政治领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Field and Zone of Power: Ideal Type Varieties and an Empirical Verification
In the article, the concepts “political field” and “zone of power” are analyzed in order to evaluate their applicability to the sociologacal study of conditions for emergence of modern-type politics in Russia – based on goal-setting and competition. The attempted conceptualization was based on neoinstitutional, deliberative and neo-republican approaches. Models developed by the authors were verified using the data of a 2018 nationwide representative population survey. It is demonstrated that, according to different understanding of rules and their role in politics, political sphere in Russia is precieved either as a closed and deformalized zone of power or as an open political field. These perceptions influence how the possibility of interests’ realization in politics is assessed and how attitudes towards participation are formed. The approaches used in the article also help to reveal how the zone of power can potentially be transformed into political field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信