埃索美拉唑和泮托拉唑对稳定肾移植受者肾功能的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Doaa El-Bohy, M. Sharkawy, Soheir Abo-Elazm, S. Shahin, Waleed Bchari, Azza Manc, M. E. Hamamsy
{"title":"埃索美拉唑和泮托拉唑对稳定肾移植受者肾功能的影响:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Doaa El-Bohy, M. Sharkawy, Soheir Abo-Elazm, S. Shahin, Waleed Bchari, Azza Manc, M. E. Hamamsy","doi":"10.21608/aps.2019.10411.1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renal allograft survival requires the administration of multiple immunosuppressive drugs. This strategy may lead to gastric complications that necessitate gastro-protective medications, notably, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study aimed to compare the effects of pantoprazole and esomeprazole on renal function in stable renal transplant recipients. A prospective, parallel, open-label clinical trial was performed with forty-seven adult renal transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine (CSA) doses adjusted to attain trough concentrations of 100-150 µg/L, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 750 mg q12 hr and prednisolone at 5 mg daily at Nasser Institute, Cairo, Egypt. The enrolled participants were randomized into two groups, which received either esomeprazole or pantoprazole at the same dose (40 mg once daily). Renal function was measured at baseline and monthly for 6 months. The study was conducted between January-September 2016. Main outcome measures clinical signs of rejection reflected by renal function decline, assessed by elevated levels of serum creatinine. The mean serum creatinine level was significantly lower in the sixth month than at baseline in esomeprazole group (p 0.004); interestingly there was a continuous decrease of serum creatinine levels in esomeprazole group and nearly constant values in pantoprazole group. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine levels between the two groups. From this study, it could be concluded that esomeprazole may be preferred over pantoprazole in renal transplant recipients because it decreased serum creatinine which is one of the markers of chronic allograft rejection in stable renal transplantation recipients.","PeriodicalId":8314,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of esomeprazole and pantoprazole on renal function in stable kidney transplantation recipients: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Doaa El-Bohy, M. Sharkawy, Soheir Abo-Elazm, S. Shahin, Waleed Bchari, Azza Manc, M. E. Hamamsy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/aps.2019.10411.1003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Renal allograft survival requires the administration of multiple immunosuppressive drugs. This strategy may lead to gastric complications that necessitate gastro-protective medications, notably, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study aimed to compare the effects of pantoprazole and esomeprazole on renal function in stable renal transplant recipients. A prospective, parallel, open-label clinical trial was performed with forty-seven adult renal transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine (CSA) doses adjusted to attain trough concentrations of 100-150 µg/L, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 750 mg q12 hr and prednisolone at 5 mg daily at Nasser Institute, Cairo, Egypt. The enrolled participants were randomized into two groups, which received either esomeprazole or pantoprazole at the same dose (40 mg once daily). Renal function was measured at baseline and monthly for 6 months. The study was conducted between January-September 2016. Main outcome measures clinical signs of rejection reflected by renal function decline, assessed by elevated levels of serum creatinine. The mean serum creatinine level was significantly lower in the sixth month than at baseline in esomeprazole group (p 0.004); interestingly there was a continuous decrease of serum creatinine levels in esomeprazole group and nearly constant values in pantoprazole group. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine levels between the two groups. From this study, it could be concluded that esomeprazole may be preferred over pantoprazole in renal transplant recipients because it decreased serum creatinine which is one of the markers of chronic allograft rejection in stable renal transplantation recipients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/aps.2019.10411.1003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aps.2019.10411.1003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同种异体肾移植存活需要多种免疫抑制药物。这种策略可能导致胃并发症,需要胃保护药物,特别是质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)。本研究旨在比较泮托拉唑和埃索美拉唑对稳定肾移植受者肾功能的影响。一项前瞻性、平行、开放标签的临床试验在埃及开罗的Nasser研究所对47名成人肾移植受者进行了免疫抑制治疗,环孢素(CSA)剂量调整至谷浓度100-150µg/L,霉酚酸酯(MMF) 750 mg / 12小时,强的松龙5mg /天。入选的参与者被随机分为两组,接受相同剂量的埃索美拉唑或泮托拉唑(40mg,每日一次)。在基线和每月测量肾功能,持续6个月。该研究于2016年1月至9月进行。主要结局指标是通过血清肌酐水平升高来评估肾功能下降所反映的排斥反应的临床体征。埃索美拉唑组患者6个月平均血清肌酐水平显著低于基线水平(p 0.004);有趣的是,埃索美拉唑组血清肌酐水平持续下降,泮托拉唑组几乎保持不变。两组患者血清肌酐水平无显著差异。从本研究可以得出结论,在肾移植受者中,埃索美拉唑可能比泮托拉唑更优选,因为它可以降低血清肌酐,而血清肌酐是稳定肾移植受者慢性同种异体移植排斥反应的标志之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of esomeprazole and pantoprazole on renal function in stable kidney transplantation recipients: A randomized clinical trial.
Renal allograft survival requires the administration of multiple immunosuppressive drugs. This strategy may lead to gastric complications that necessitate gastro-protective medications, notably, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study aimed to compare the effects of pantoprazole and esomeprazole on renal function in stable renal transplant recipients. A prospective, parallel, open-label clinical trial was performed with forty-seven adult renal transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine (CSA) doses adjusted to attain trough concentrations of 100-150 µg/L, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 750 mg q12 hr and prednisolone at 5 mg daily at Nasser Institute, Cairo, Egypt. The enrolled participants were randomized into two groups, which received either esomeprazole or pantoprazole at the same dose (40 mg once daily). Renal function was measured at baseline and monthly for 6 months. The study was conducted between January-September 2016. Main outcome measures clinical signs of rejection reflected by renal function decline, assessed by elevated levels of serum creatinine. The mean serum creatinine level was significantly lower in the sixth month than at baseline in esomeprazole group (p 0.004); interestingly there was a continuous decrease of serum creatinine levels in esomeprazole group and nearly constant values in pantoprazole group. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine levels between the two groups. From this study, it could be concluded that esomeprazole may be preferred over pantoprazole in renal transplant recipients because it decreased serum creatinine which is one of the markers of chronic allograft rejection in stable renal transplantation recipients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信