CAGE、illumina芯片和实时RT-PCR基因表达谱的比较。

André Fujita, Masao Nagasaki, S. Imoto, A. Saito, Emi Ikeda, Teppei Shimamura, R. Yamaguchi, Y. Hayashizaki, S. Miyano
{"title":"CAGE、illumina芯片和实时RT-PCR基因表达谱的比较。","authors":"André Fujita, Masao Nagasaki, S. Imoto, A. Saito, Emi Ikeda, Teppei Shimamura, R. Yamaguchi, Y. Hayashizaki, S. Miyano","doi":"10.1142/9781848166585_0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several technologies are currently used for gene expression profiling, such as Real Time RT-PCR, microarray and CAGE (Cap Analysis of Gene Expression). CAGE is a recently developed method for constructing transcriptome maps and it has been successfully applied to analyzing gene expressions in diverse biological studies. The principle of CAGE has been developed to address specific issues such as determination of transcriptional starting sites, the study of promoter regions and identification of new transcripts. Here, we present both quantitative and qualitative comparisons among three major gene expression quantification techniques, namely: CAGE, illumina microarray and Real Time RT-PCR, by showing that the quantitative values of each method are not interchangeable, however, each of them has unique characteristics which render all of them essential and complementary. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each technology will be useful in selecting the most appropriate technique for a determined purpose.","PeriodicalId":73143,"journal":{"name":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of gene expression profiles produced by CAGE, illumina microarray and real time RT-PCR.\",\"authors\":\"André Fujita, Masao Nagasaki, S. Imoto, A. Saito, Emi Ikeda, Teppei Shimamura, R. Yamaguchi, Y. Hayashizaki, S. Miyano\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/9781848166585_0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several technologies are currently used for gene expression profiling, such as Real Time RT-PCR, microarray and CAGE (Cap Analysis of Gene Expression). CAGE is a recently developed method for constructing transcriptome maps and it has been successfully applied to analyzing gene expressions in diverse biological studies. The principle of CAGE has been developed to address specific issues such as determination of transcriptional starting sites, the study of promoter regions and identification of new transcripts. Here, we present both quantitative and qualitative comparisons among three major gene expression quantification techniques, namely: CAGE, illumina microarray and Real Time RT-PCR, by showing that the quantitative values of each method are not interchangeable, however, each of them has unique characteristics which render all of them essential and complementary. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each technology will be useful in selecting the most appropriate technique for a determined purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848166585_0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848166585_0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目前有几种技术用于基因表达谱分析,如实时RT-PCR、微阵列和CAGE(基因表达帽分析)。CAGE是最近发展起来的一种构建转录组图谱的方法,它已成功地应用于多种生物学研究中的基因表达分析。CAGE的原理已经发展到解决特定的问题,如转录起始位点的确定、启动子区域的研究和新转录物的鉴定。在这里,我们对CAGE、illumina microarray和Real Time RT-PCR这三种主要的基因表达定量技术进行了定量和定性比较,表明每种方法的定量值是不可互换的,但每种方法都有其独特的特点,使它们都是必要的和互补的。了解每种技术的优点和缺点将有助于为确定的目的选择最合适的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of gene expression profiles produced by CAGE, illumina microarray and real time RT-PCR.
Several technologies are currently used for gene expression profiling, such as Real Time RT-PCR, microarray and CAGE (Cap Analysis of Gene Expression). CAGE is a recently developed method for constructing transcriptome maps and it has been successfully applied to analyzing gene expressions in diverse biological studies. The principle of CAGE has been developed to address specific issues such as determination of transcriptional starting sites, the study of promoter regions and identification of new transcripts. Here, we present both quantitative and qualitative comparisons among three major gene expression quantification techniques, namely: CAGE, illumina microarray and Real Time RT-PCR, by showing that the quantitative values of each method are not interchangeable, however, each of them has unique characteristics which render all of them essential and complementary. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each technology will be useful in selecting the most appropriate technique for a determined purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信