考虑试样形状的可储存弹性应变能岩爆倾向性评价

Song Luo, Fengqiang Gong
{"title":"考虑试样形状的可储存弹性应变能岩爆倾向性评价","authors":"Song Luo,&nbsp;Fengqiang Gong","doi":"10.1002/dug2.12020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To systematically assess the rockburst proneness considering specimen shape, multiple groups of laboratory tests were performed on 5 rock materials in cylindrical and cuboid shapes. The linear energy storage (LES) law of both cylindrical and cuboid rock specimens under uniaxial compressive load was confirmed, and the energy storage coefficient was found to be unrelated to specimen shape. On the basis of LES law, two rockburst proneness indexes, namely the strain energy storage index (<i>W</i><sub>et</sub>) and the potential energy of elastic strain (PES), were modified. Subsequently, the <i>W</i><sub>et</sub>, PES, peak-strength strain energy storage index (, and peak-strength potential energy of elastic strain (PES<sup>p</sup>) were used to assess the rockburst proneness of the cylindrical and cuboid specimens. In addition, the fragment ejection course of specimens under test was recorded by a high-speed camera. Then, the rockburst proneness judgments obtained from the 4 indexes were compared with the qualitative data during rock destruction. The results show that, under similar stress conditions, specimen shape has an ignorable effect on the rockburst proneness as a whole. The judgment accuracy of the two modified indexes, especially that of the PES<sup>p</sup>, is favorably improved to evaluate the rockburst proneness of both cylindrical and cuboid specimens. However, misjudgment of and PES<sup>p</sup> may still occur in the assessment of rockburst proneness as these two indexes only consider the energy state before rock peak strength and the is formulated in a ratio form.</p>","PeriodicalId":100363,"journal":{"name":"Deep Underground Science and Engineering","volume":"1 2","pages":"116-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dug2.12020","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of rockburst proneness considering specimen shape by storable elastic strain energy\",\"authors\":\"Song Luo,&nbsp;Fengqiang Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dug2.12020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To systematically assess the rockburst proneness considering specimen shape, multiple groups of laboratory tests were performed on 5 rock materials in cylindrical and cuboid shapes. The linear energy storage (LES) law of both cylindrical and cuboid rock specimens under uniaxial compressive load was confirmed, and the energy storage coefficient was found to be unrelated to specimen shape. On the basis of LES law, two rockburst proneness indexes, namely the strain energy storage index (<i>W</i><sub>et</sub>) and the potential energy of elastic strain (PES), were modified. Subsequently, the <i>W</i><sub>et</sub>, PES, peak-strength strain energy storage index (, and peak-strength potential energy of elastic strain (PES<sup>p</sup>) were used to assess the rockburst proneness of the cylindrical and cuboid specimens. In addition, the fragment ejection course of specimens under test was recorded by a high-speed camera. Then, the rockburst proneness judgments obtained from the 4 indexes were compared with the qualitative data during rock destruction. The results show that, under similar stress conditions, specimen shape has an ignorable effect on the rockburst proneness as a whole. The judgment accuracy of the two modified indexes, especially that of the PES<sup>p</sup>, is favorably improved to evaluate the rockburst proneness of both cylindrical and cuboid specimens. However, misjudgment of and PES<sup>p</sup> may still occur in the assessment of rockburst proneness as these two indexes only consider the energy state before rock peak strength and the is formulated in a ratio form.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deep Underground Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"116-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dug2.12020\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deep Underground Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dug2.12020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deep Underground Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dug2.12020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

为了系统地评估考虑试样形状的岩爆倾向性,对5种圆柱形和长方体岩石材料进行了多组室内试验。证实了柱状和长方体岩石试件在单轴压缩载荷作用下的线性储能规律,且储能系数与试件形状无关。在LES定律的基础上,修正了两个岩爆倾向性指标,即应变蓄能指数Wet和弹性应变势能PES。随后,采用Wet、PES、峰值强度应变能存储指数()和弹性应变峰值强度势能(PESp)对柱状和长方体试样的岩爆倾向性进行评价。同时,用高速摄像机记录了试样的破片弹射过程。然后,将4个指标得出的岩爆倾向性判断与岩石破坏过程中的定性数据进行对比。结果表明,在相同的应力条件下,试件形状对岩爆倾向性的整体影响可以忽略不计。修正后的两种指标,尤其是PESp指标的判断精度,在评价柱状和长方体岩爆倾向性时均有较好的提高。然而,由于两种指标仅考虑岩石峰值强度前的能量状态,且以比值形式表示,因此在评价岩爆倾向性时仍有可能出现误判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of rockburst proneness considering specimen shape by storable elastic strain energy

Evaluation of rockburst proneness considering specimen shape by storable elastic strain energy

To systematically assess the rockburst proneness considering specimen shape, multiple groups of laboratory tests were performed on 5 rock materials in cylindrical and cuboid shapes. The linear energy storage (LES) law of both cylindrical and cuboid rock specimens under uniaxial compressive load was confirmed, and the energy storage coefficient was found to be unrelated to specimen shape. On the basis of LES law, two rockburst proneness indexes, namely the strain energy storage index (Wet) and the potential energy of elastic strain (PES), were modified. Subsequently, the Wet, PES, peak-strength strain energy storage index (, and peak-strength potential energy of elastic strain (PESp) were used to assess the rockburst proneness of the cylindrical and cuboid specimens. In addition, the fragment ejection course of specimens under test was recorded by a high-speed camera. Then, the rockburst proneness judgments obtained from the 4 indexes were compared with the qualitative data during rock destruction. The results show that, under similar stress conditions, specimen shape has an ignorable effect on the rockburst proneness as a whole. The judgment accuracy of the two modified indexes, especially that of the PESp, is favorably improved to evaluate the rockburst proneness of both cylindrical and cuboid specimens. However, misjudgment of and PESp may still occur in the assessment of rockburst proneness as these two indexes only consider the energy state before rock peak strength and the is formulated in a ratio form.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信