se -修订版的心理测量特性:一个rasch模型分析

Siti Juniawati Rosa, Ahyani Radhiani Fitri, I. Agung
{"title":"se -修订版的心理测量特性:一个rasch模型分析","authors":"Siti Juniawati Rosa, Ahyani Radhiani Fitri, I. Agung","doi":"10.26555/HUMANITAS.V16I1.10919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Satz Ergaenzung (SE) is the first subtest in the Intelligenz Struktur Test (IST) that measures reasoning ability. Previous studies found that SE has suboptimum performance in measuring subject's ability. Therefore, this study intended to revise the SE items that were found to have poor psychometric properties, either by changing the questions and answer choices, the answer choices only, or changing the order of the questions. This study used the rasch model to determine the psychometric property of SE-revised. A total of 159 undergraduate students of a university in Riau participated in this study. The results showed that the revised SE had fulfilled the pre-requisites of unidimensionality. The instrument reliability increased after being revised, where the items of SE-revised correctly measure respondents' abilities. The revised version may be used as an improvement of the original SE, with better psychometric properties. However, there were four items with low difficulty index and two items that have DIF. Even though SE-revised is better than the original SE, further research is needed to revise the six items of SE-revised subtest.","PeriodicalId":33697,"journal":{"name":"Humanitas Indonesian Psychological Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the SE-Revised: A rasch model analysis\",\"authors\":\"Siti Juniawati Rosa, Ahyani Radhiani Fitri, I. Agung\",\"doi\":\"10.26555/HUMANITAS.V16I1.10919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Satz Ergaenzung (SE) is the first subtest in the Intelligenz Struktur Test (IST) that measures reasoning ability. Previous studies found that SE has suboptimum performance in measuring subject's ability. Therefore, this study intended to revise the SE items that were found to have poor psychometric properties, either by changing the questions and answer choices, the answer choices only, or changing the order of the questions. This study used the rasch model to determine the psychometric property of SE-revised. A total of 159 undergraduate students of a university in Riau participated in this study. The results showed that the revised SE had fulfilled the pre-requisites of unidimensionality. The instrument reliability increased after being revised, where the items of SE-revised correctly measure respondents' abilities. The revised version may be used as an improvement of the original SE, with better psychometric properties. However, there were four items with low difficulty index and two items that have DIF. Even though SE-revised is better than the original SE, further research is needed to revise the six items of SE-revised subtest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humanitas Indonesian Psychological Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humanitas Indonesian Psychological Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26555/HUMANITAS.V16I1.10919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanitas Indonesian Psychological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/HUMANITAS.V16I1.10919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

推理能力(SE)是智力结构测试(IST)中衡量推理能力的第一个子测试。以往的研究发现,SE在测量被试能力方面表现不佳。因此,本研究拟通过改变问题和答案选项,或仅改变答案选项,或改变问题的顺序,对心理测量学性质较差的SE项目进行修订。本研究采用rasch模型确定se修正后的心理测量特性。廖内省一所大学的159名本科生参与了本研究。结果表明,修正后的SE满足了单维性的前提条件。修正后的量表信度增加,其中se -修正的项目正确地衡量了被调查者的能力。修订后的版本可以作为原始SE的改进,具有更好的心理测量特性。而难度指数较低的项目有4个,具有DIF的项目有2个。虽然修改后的SE比原来的SE更好,但修改后的SE子测验的6个项目还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric properties of the SE-Revised: A rasch model analysis
Satz Ergaenzung (SE) is the first subtest in the Intelligenz Struktur Test (IST) that measures reasoning ability. Previous studies found that SE has suboptimum performance in measuring subject's ability. Therefore, this study intended to revise the SE items that were found to have poor psychometric properties, either by changing the questions and answer choices, the answer choices only, or changing the order of the questions. This study used the rasch model to determine the psychometric property of SE-revised. A total of 159 undergraduate students of a university in Riau participated in this study. The results showed that the revised SE had fulfilled the pre-requisites of unidimensionality. The instrument reliability increased after being revised, where the items of SE-revised correctly measure respondents' abilities. The revised version may be used as an improvement of the original SE, with better psychometric properties. However, there were four items with low difficulty index and two items that have DIF. Even though SE-revised is better than the original SE, further research is needed to revise the six items of SE-revised subtest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信