中东碳酸盐岩储层成功的四维地震监测

F. Cailly, T. Al-Romani, C. Hubans, A. Lafram, A. Kaabi
{"title":"中东碳酸盐岩储层成功的四维地震监测","authors":"F. Cailly, T. Al-Romani, C. Hubans, A. Lafram, A. Kaabi","doi":"10.2118/193063-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper describes 4D interpretation results in a very challenging Middle East carbonate context.\n It consists of a 4D pilot (OBC/OBC) over a giant field divided into two phases. For Phase1 the monitor seismic survey has repeated the geometry of the base survey (parallel shooting) to get started in the best possible 4D conditions. For Phase2 the monitor seismic survey design is a modern source spread acquisition for wide azimuth objective. It is clearly different from the base survey design, and so starts with a worse 4D repeatibility.\n In this paper, we describe the challenges attached to both phases of this pilot and explain how in the end it has been successfully interpreted.\n A focused study is made on a particular 4D anomaly corresponding to an increase of impedance in the reservoir. This is interpreted as the water front movement (due to water injection) during the interval between base and monitor surveys. Petrophysically this is consistent, if water replaces oil in the reservoir then impedance increases. However, 4D interpretation can be ambiguous and other production phenomena can explain impedance increase, so the interpretation must be assessed carefully. This is done through calibration of the interpretation to well data (time evolution of the water cut).\n The final interpretation is robust. Other elements not described in the paper could have been added to consolidate the interpretation like the fact that interpreted 4D anomalies (and so water rise-up) stop vertically on a well known impermeable barrier (anhydrite level).\n Once the 4D signal is calibrated, unexpected phenomena (i.e. heterogeneities not predicted by the reservoir model) are highlighted as potentially providing added value to reservoir understanding. As a deliverable, 4D anomalies are interpreted as 3D geobodies and a water rise-up top surface is picked. This information will be key to position new wells and to update the reservoir model.\n Though 4D seismic techniques are very mature and widely illustrated in clastic reservoir environments, it is still rarely used operationally to monitor carbonate fields. This paper proves the concept that a reliable 4D signal can be extracted over such Middle-East carbonate reservoir.","PeriodicalId":11208,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Successful 4D Seismic Monitoring in Middle-East Carbonate Reservoir Context\",\"authors\":\"F. Cailly, T. Al-Romani, C. Hubans, A. Lafram, A. Kaabi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/193063-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper describes 4D interpretation results in a very challenging Middle East carbonate context.\\n It consists of a 4D pilot (OBC/OBC) over a giant field divided into two phases. For Phase1 the monitor seismic survey has repeated the geometry of the base survey (parallel shooting) to get started in the best possible 4D conditions. For Phase2 the monitor seismic survey design is a modern source spread acquisition for wide azimuth objective. It is clearly different from the base survey design, and so starts with a worse 4D repeatibility.\\n In this paper, we describe the challenges attached to both phases of this pilot and explain how in the end it has been successfully interpreted.\\n A focused study is made on a particular 4D anomaly corresponding to an increase of impedance in the reservoir. This is interpreted as the water front movement (due to water injection) during the interval between base and monitor surveys. Petrophysically this is consistent, if water replaces oil in the reservoir then impedance increases. However, 4D interpretation can be ambiguous and other production phenomena can explain impedance increase, so the interpretation must be assessed carefully. This is done through calibration of the interpretation to well data (time evolution of the water cut).\\n The final interpretation is robust. Other elements not described in the paper could have been added to consolidate the interpretation like the fact that interpreted 4D anomalies (and so water rise-up) stop vertically on a well known impermeable barrier (anhydrite level).\\n Once the 4D signal is calibrated, unexpected phenomena (i.e. heterogeneities not predicted by the reservoir model) are highlighted as potentially providing added value to reservoir understanding. As a deliverable, 4D anomalies are interpreted as 3D geobodies and a water rise-up top surface is picked. This information will be key to position new wells and to update the reservoir model.\\n Though 4D seismic techniques are very mature and widely illustrated in clastic reservoir environments, it is still rarely used operationally to monitor carbonate fields. This paper proves the concept that a reliable 4D signal can be extracted over such Middle-East carbonate reservoir.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/193063-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193063-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了中东碳酸盐岩地层中具有挑战性的四维解释结果。它包括一个四维先导(OBC/OBC),在一个大油田上分为两个阶段。对于第一阶段,监测地震测量重复了基础测量的几何形状(平行射击),以便在最佳的四维条件下开始。第二阶段的监测地震勘探设计是一种现代宽方位角物镜的震源展布采集。它与基础调查设计明显不同,因此从4D可重复性较差开始。在本文中,我们描述了该试点的两个阶段所面临的挑战,并解释了最终如何成功地解释它。重点研究了与储层阻抗增加相对应的特定四维异常。这被解释为在基地和监测测量之间的间隔期间,由于注水引起的前缘运动。岩石物理上这是一致的,如果储层中的水取代了油,那么阻抗就会增加。然而,四维解释可能是模糊的,其他生产现象可以解释阻抗增加,因此必须仔细评估解释。这是通过对井数据的解释(含水率的时间演变)进行校准来完成的。最终的解释是可靠的。其他未在论文中描述的因素也可以被添加进来,以巩固解释,比如解释的四维异常(因此水上升)垂直停止在一个众所周知的不透水屏障上(硬石膏层)。一旦对四维信号进行校准,就会突出显示意想不到的现象(即储层模型无法预测的非均质性),为了解储层提供潜在的附加价值。作为产出物,四维异常被解释为三维地质体,水上升的顶部被选中。这些信息将是定位新井和更新储层模型的关键。尽管四维地震技术在碎屑储层环境中已经非常成熟并得到了广泛应用,但在实际应用中仍很少用于碳酸盐岩油田的监测。本文验证了在中东碳酸盐岩储层上可以提取可靠的四维信号的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Successful 4D Seismic Monitoring in Middle-East Carbonate Reservoir Context
This paper describes 4D interpretation results in a very challenging Middle East carbonate context. It consists of a 4D pilot (OBC/OBC) over a giant field divided into two phases. For Phase1 the monitor seismic survey has repeated the geometry of the base survey (parallel shooting) to get started in the best possible 4D conditions. For Phase2 the monitor seismic survey design is a modern source spread acquisition for wide azimuth objective. It is clearly different from the base survey design, and so starts with a worse 4D repeatibility. In this paper, we describe the challenges attached to both phases of this pilot and explain how in the end it has been successfully interpreted. A focused study is made on a particular 4D anomaly corresponding to an increase of impedance in the reservoir. This is interpreted as the water front movement (due to water injection) during the interval between base and monitor surveys. Petrophysically this is consistent, if water replaces oil in the reservoir then impedance increases. However, 4D interpretation can be ambiguous and other production phenomena can explain impedance increase, so the interpretation must be assessed carefully. This is done through calibration of the interpretation to well data (time evolution of the water cut). The final interpretation is robust. Other elements not described in the paper could have been added to consolidate the interpretation like the fact that interpreted 4D anomalies (and so water rise-up) stop vertically on a well known impermeable barrier (anhydrite level). Once the 4D signal is calibrated, unexpected phenomena (i.e. heterogeneities not predicted by the reservoir model) are highlighted as potentially providing added value to reservoir understanding. As a deliverable, 4D anomalies are interpreted as 3D geobodies and a water rise-up top surface is picked. This information will be key to position new wells and to update the reservoir model. Though 4D seismic techniques are very mature and widely illustrated in clastic reservoir environments, it is still rarely used operationally to monitor carbonate fields. This paper proves the concept that a reliable 4D signal can be extracted over such Middle-East carbonate reservoir.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信