分包:对民法典第706条的评注

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW

Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI:10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-4-130-176

I. I. Zikun

{"title":"分包:对民法典第706条的评注","authors":"I. I. Zikun","doi":"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-4-130-176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a commentary to Article 706 of the Civil Code “General Contractor and Subcontractor”. The author uses the doctrine of back-to-back contracts to examine the peculiarities of the structure of contractual relations in the area of a subcontract, as well as the peculiarities of risk distribution when parties to a contractor relationship refuse from back-to-back clause. The author also investigates the peculiarities of direct claiming from an employer to a subcontractor under the doctrine of culpa in eligendo. The author concludes that if a non-contractual relationship arises, the client has the right to bring a direct claim against the subcontractor.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SUBCONTRACT: COMMENTARY TO ARTICLE 706 OF THE CIVIL CODE\",\"authors\":\"I. I. Zikun\",\"doi\":\"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-4-130-176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article provides a commentary to Article 706 of the Civil Code “General Contractor and Subcontractor”. The author uses the doctrine of back-to-back contracts to examine the peculiarities of the structure of contractual relations in the area of a subcontract, as well as the peculiarities of risk distribution when parties to a contractor relationship refuse from back-to-back clause. The author also investigates the peculiarities of direct claiming from an employer to a subcontractor under the doctrine of culpa in eligendo. The author concludes that if a non-contractual relationship arises, the client has the right to bring a direct claim against the subcontractor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-4-130-176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-4-130-176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对民法典第706条“总承包人和分包商”进行了评注。作者运用背靠背合同理论考察了分包合同领域合同关系结构的特殊性，以及承包商关系各方拒绝背靠背条款时风险分配的特殊性。作者还调查了雇主根据合法过失原则向分包商直接索赔的特点。作者的结论是，如果出现非合同关系，客户有权对分包商提出直接索赔。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

SUBCONTRACT: COMMENTARY TO ARTICLE 706 OF THE CIVIL CODE

The article provides a commentary to Article 706 of the Civil Code “General Contractor and Subcontractor”. The author uses the doctrine of back-to-back contracts to examine the peculiarities of the structure of contractual relations in the area of a subcontract, as well as the peculiarities of risk distribution when parties to a contractor relationship refuse from back-to-back clause. The author also investigates the peculiarities of direct claiming from an employer to a subcontractor under the doctrine of culpa in eligendo. The author concludes that if a non-contractual relationship arises, the client has the right to bring a direct claim against the subcontractor.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.