十年的儿童重症监护推广与儿童病情恶化——一家三级儿童医院剂量与预后的关系

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS
L. Kirby, Jayshan Chagan, Catherine Adams, N. Duns, M. Haddad, S. Pearson, O. Tegg, C. Goh
{"title":"十年的儿童重症监护推广与儿童病情恶化——一家三级儿童医院剂量与预后的关系","authors":"L. Kirby, Jayshan Chagan, Catherine Adams, N. Duns, M. Haddad, S. Pearson, O. Tegg, C. Goh","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1750298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to evaluate the amalgamation and maturation of a Pediatric Intensive Care Outreach Service (PICOS) with a rapid response system (RRS) and associated outcomes over a 10-year period. It is a single-center retrospective study analyzing patient outcomes within the context of significant organizational changes introducing a track and trigger RRS called Between the Flags (BTF) and evolution of this system to electronic observation charting and alerts (eBTF) in a tertiary metropolitan children's hospital. Children on inpatient wards who required urgent activation of the RRS and admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between 2009 and 2018 were included. Three cohorts were identified according to the system changes—pre-BTF (2009–2011), BTF (2012–2017), and eBTF (2017–2018). The PICOS dose (number of activations per 1000 hospital admissions) increased with the introduction of BTF and the RRS and this trend continued following eBTF. The number of PICU admissions via the PICOS did not vary across the decade. When comparing the pre-BTF to the BTF group, PICU mortality decreased (p < 0.05), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 Risk of Death scores improved, and hospital length of stay decreased (p < 0.05) in the BTF group. Introduction of a track and trigger RRS and electronic charting augmenting an existing PICOS is associated with increasing dose and workload, with no significant impact on PICU admission rates or length of stay. PICOS patient mortality has notably decreased with the introduction of an RRS; however, this impact was not sustained with the addition of electronic charting and alerts in the patient medical record.","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Decade of Pediatric Intensive Care Outreach and the Deteriorating Child—The Relationship between Dose and Outcomes in a Tertiary Children's Hospital\",\"authors\":\"L. Kirby, Jayshan Chagan, Catherine Adams, N. Duns, M. Haddad, S. Pearson, O. Tegg, C. Goh\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1750298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to evaluate the amalgamation and maturation of a Pediatric Intensive Care Outreach Service (PICOS) with a rapid response system (RRS) and associated outcomes over a 10-year period. It is a single-center retrospective study analyzing patient outcomes within the context of significant organizational changes introducing a track and trigger RRS called Between the Flags (BTF) and evolution of this system to electronic observation charting and alerts (eBTF) in a tertiary metropolitan children's hospital. Children on inpatient wards who required urgent activation of the RRS and admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between 2009 and 2018 were included. Three cohorts were identified according to the system changes—pre-BTF (2009–2011), BTF (2012–2017), and eBTF (2017–2018). The PICOS dose (number of activations per 1000 hospital admissions) increased with the introduction of BTF and the RRS and this trend continued following eBTF. The number of PICU admissions via the PICOS did not vary across the decade. When comparing the pre-BTF to the BTF group, PICU mortality decreased (p < 0.05), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 Risk of Death scores improved, and hospital length of stay decreased (p < 0.05) in the BTF group. Introduction of a track and trigger RRS and electronic charting augmenting an existing PICOS is associated with increasing dose and workload, with no significant impact on PICU admission rates or length of stay. PICOS patient mortality has notably decreased with the introduction of an RRS; however, this impact was not sustained with the addition of electronic charting and alerts in the patient medical record.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估儿科重症监护外展服务(PICOS)与快速反应系统(RRS)的合并和成熟以及10年期间的相关结果。这是一项单中心回顾性研究,分析了一家三级城市儿童医院在重大组织变革背景下的患者结果,该组织变革引入了跟踪和触发RRS,称为“旗帜之间”(BTF),并将该系统演变为电子观察图表和警报(eBTF)。纳入了2009年至2018年期间需要紧急激活RRS并入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的住院儿童。根据系统变化确定了三个队列:BTF前(2009-2011),BTF(2012-2017)和eBTF(2017-2018)。随着BTF和RRS的引入,PICOS剂量(每1000例住院患者的激活数)增加,并且这一趋势在eBTF之后继续存在。通过PICOS入院的PICU数量在十年中没有变化。与BTF组比较,BTF组PICU死亡率降低(p < 0.05),儿科死亡率指数2死亡风险评分提高,住院时间缩短(p < 0.05)。引入跟踪触发RRS和电子图表增加现有PICOS与剂量和工作量增加有关,对PICU入院率或住院时间没有显著影响。引入RRS后,PICOS患者死亡率显著降低;然而,在患者医疗记录中增加电子图表和警报后,这种影响并没有持续下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Decade of Pediatric Intensive Care Outreach and the Deteriorating Child—The Relationship between Dose and Outcomes in a Tertiary Children's Hospital
The aim of this study is to evaluate the amalgamation and maturation of a Pediatric Intensive Care Outreach Service (PICOS) with a rapid response system (RRS) and associated outcomes over a 10-year period. It is a single-center retrospective study analyzing patient outcomes within the context of significant organizational changes introducing a track and trigger RRS called Between the Flags (BTF) and evolution of this system to electronic observation charting and alerts (eBTF) in a tertiary metropolitan children's hospital. Children on inpatient wards who required urgent activation of the RRS and admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between 2009 and 2018 were included. Three cohorts were identified according to the system changes—pre-BTF (2009–2011), BTF (2012–2017), and eBTF (2017–2018). The PICOS dose (number of activations per 1000 hospital admissions) increased with the introduction of BTF and the RRS and this trend continued following eBTF. The number of PICU admissions via the PICOS did not vary across the decade. When comparing the pre-BTF to the BTF group, PICU mortality decreased (p < 0.05), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 Risk of Death scores improved, and hospital length of stay decreased (p < 0.05) in the BTF group. Introduction of a track and trigger RRS and electronic charting augmenting an existing PICOS is associated with increasing dose and workload, with no significant impact on PICU admission rates or length of stay. PICOS patient mortality has notably decreased with the introduction of an RRS; however, this impact was not sustained with the addition of electronic charting and alerts in the patient medical record.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信