循环式和准直式铯炉的对比分析。

R. Hahn, T. Battard, Oscar Boucher, Y. Picard, H. Lignier, D. Comparat, Nolwenn-Amandine Keriel, Colin Lopez, Emanuel Oswald, M. Reveillard, M. Viteau
{"title":"循环式和准直式铯炉的对比分析。","authors":"R. Hahn, T. Battard, Oscar Boucher, Y. Picard, H. Lignier, D. Comparat, Nolwenn-Amandine Keriel, Colin Lopez, Emanuel Oswald, M. Reveillard, M. Viteau","doi":"10.1063/5.0085838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have performed a study of several cesium oven designs. A comparison between recirculating (or sticking-wall) and collimating (or re-emitting-wall) ovens is made in order to extract the most efficient design in terms of beam brightness. Unfortunately, non-reproducible behaviors have been observed, and the most often observed output flux is similar to the sticking-wall case, which is the lowest theoretical value of the two cases, with a beam brightness close to 1018 at. sr-1 s-1 cm-2. The reason of this universally observed behavior is unclear despite having tested several materials for the collimating tube. Conclusion on possible improved design based on sticking of cesium on several (un)cleaned surfaces is given.","PeriodicalId":54761,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Optical Society of America and Review of Scientific Instruments","volume":"94 3 1","pages":"043302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of recirculating and collimating cesium ovens.\",\"authors\":\"R. Hahn, T. Battard, Oscar Boucher, Y. Picard, H. Lignier, D. Comparat, Nolwenn-Amandine Keriel, Colin Lopez, Emanuel Oswald, M. Reveillard, M. Viteau\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0085838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have performed a study of several cesium oven designs. A comparison between recirculating (or sticking-wall) and collimating (or re-emitting-wall) ovens is made in order to extract the most efficient design in terms of beam brightness. Unfortunately, non-reproducible behaviors have been observed, and the most often observed output flux is similar to the sticking-wall case, which is the lowest theoretical value of the two cases, with a beam brightness close to 1018 at. sr-1 s-1 cm-2. The reason of this universally observed behavior is unclear despite having tested several materials for the collimating tube. Conclusion on possible improved design based on sticking of cesium on several (un)cleaned surfaces is given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Optical Society of America and Review of Scientific Instruments\",\"volume\":\"94 3 1\",\"pages\":\"043302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Optical Society of America and Review of Scientific Instruments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0085838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Optical Society of America and Review of Scientific Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0085838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们对几种铯炉的设计进行了研究。为了在光束亮度方面提取出最有效的设计,对循环(或粘壁)和准直(或重发射壁)烤箱进行了比较。不幸的是,已经观察到不可重现的行为,最常观察到的输出通量与粘壁情况相似,这是两种情况中最低的理论值,光束亮度接近1018 at。Sr-1 s-1 cm-2。这种普遍观察到的行为的原因尚不清楚,尽管已经测试了几种材料的准直管。最后给出了几种(未)清洁表面上铯粘接的改进设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of recirculating and collimating cesium ovens.
We have performed a study of several cesium oven designs. A comparison between recirculating (or sticking-wall) and collimating (or re-emitting-wall) ovens is made in order to extract the most efficient design in terms of beam brightness. Unfortunately, non-reproducible behaviors have been observed, and the most often observed output flux is similar to the sticking-wall case, which is the lowest theoretical value of the two cases, with a beam brightness close to 1018 at. sr-1 s-1 cm-2. The reason of this universally observed behavior is unclear despite having tested several materials for the collimating tube. Conclusion on possible improved design based on sticking of cesium on several (un)cleaned surfaces is given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信