“桥之战”:追求斯堪的纳维亚足球的优势

IF 1 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
S. Junghagen
{"title":"“桥之战”:追求斯堪的纳维亚足球的优势","authors":"S. Junghagen","doi":"10.1080/14660970.2023.2179200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In December 2019, FC Copenhagen and Malmö FF met in the final round of the UEFA Europa League group stage. The match was in media labelled ‘the battle of the bridge’ since the two clubs from Denmark and Sweden were just a bridge apart. The two clubs both have the ambition to be a leading club in Scandinavia and the aim of this paper is to examine to what extent it is possible to determine which one of the two clubs can claim to be superior in Scandinavia. The evaluation is based on a comparison of the two clubs’ performance in three dimensions: success in sports, financial performance and contribution to society. Given the different organizational and contextual conditions, a relative comparative approach was used. Results show that none of the clubs is superior as a whole, but have respective strong competitive advantages in the individual dimensions.","PeriodicalId":47395,"journal":{"name":"Soccer & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘battle of the bridge’: the quest for superiority in Scandinavian football\",\"authors\":\"S. Junghagen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14660970.2023.2179200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In December 2019, FC Copenhagen and Malmö FF met in the final round of the UEFA Europa League group stage. The match was in media labelled ‘the battle of the bridge’ since the two clubs from Denmark and Sweden were just a bridge apart. The two clubs both have the ambition to be a leading club in Scandinavia and the aim of this paper is to examine to what extent it is possible to determine which one of the two clubs can claim to be superior in Scandinavia. The evaluation is based on a comparison of the two clubs’ performance in three dimensions: success in sports, financial performance and contribution to society. Given the different organizational and contextual conditions, a relative comparative approach was used. Results show that none of the clubs is superior as a whole, but have respective strong competitive advantages in the individual dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soccer & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soccer & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2023.2179200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soccer & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2023.2179200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年12月,哥本哈根FC与Malmö FF在欧联杯小组赛最后一轮相遇。这场比赛被媒体称为“桥之战”,因为这两家来自丹麦和瑞典的俱乐部只隔了一座桥。这两家俱乐部都有成为斯堪的纳维亚领先俱乐部的雄心,本文的目的是研究在多大程度上可以确定这两家俱乐部中的哪一家可以声称在斯堪的纳维亚是优越的。该评估是基于对两家俱乐部在三个方面的表现进行比较:体育成绩、财务表现和对社会的贡献。考虑到不同的组织和背景条件,采用了相对比较的方法。结果表明,各俱乐部在整体上都不占优势,但在个体维度上各有较强的竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ‘battle of the bridge’: the quest for superiority in Scandinavian football
ABSTRACT In December 2019, FC Copenhagen and Malmö FF met in the final round of the UEFA Europa League group stage. The match was in media labelled ‘the battle of the bridge’ since the two clubs from Denmark and Sweden were just a bridge apart. The two clubs both have the ambition to be a leading club in Scandinavia and the aim of this paper is to examine to what extent it is possible to determine which one of the two clubs can claim to be superior in Scandinavia. The evaluation is based on a comparison of the two clubs’ performance in three dimensions: success in sports, financial performance and contribution to society. Given the different organizational and contextual conditions, a relative comparative approach was used. Results show that none of the clubs is superior as a whole, but have respective strong competitive advantages in the individual dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soccer & Society
Soccer & Society HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信