揭露四个东南亚国家应对新冠肺炎的社会政策:制度模式和政策调整

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Tauchid Komara Yuda, Mina Kim, Aungsumalee Pholpark, Hamzah Nor Bin Aedy Rahman
{"title":"揭露四个东南亚国家应对新冠肺炎的社会政策:制度模式和政策调整","authors":"Tauchid Komara Yuda, Mina Kim, Aungsumalee Pholpark, Hamzah Nor Bin Aedy Rahman","doi":"10.1080/02185385.2022.2136234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article aimed to compare the social policy responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand using an institutionalist’s perspective. So far, the crisis expanded social protection through temporary schemes, with rare reforms, and opened greater possibilities for future institutionalisation of new policies. We argue that the COVID-19 policy responses must be viewed as an unfinished agenda of expansion-driven policy responses to the 1997–1998 financial crisis. Still, these are different sets of measures from the previous crisis, which have been characterised by minimal systemic changes. The variegated responses of countries reveal hitherto unexplored policy implications for the Southeast Asian region.","PeriodicalId":44820,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development","volume":"2 1","pages":"294 - 317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unmasking the social policy responses of COVID-19 in four Southeast Asian Nations: institutional patterns and policy adjustment\",\"authors\":\"Tauchid Komara Yuda, Mina Kim, Aungsumalee Pholpark, Hamzah Nor Bin Aedy Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02185385.2022.2136234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article aimed to compare the social policy responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand using an institutionalist’s perspective. So far, the crisis expanded social protection through temporary schemes, with rare reforms, and opened greater possibilities for future institutionalisation of new policies. We argue that the COVID-19 policy responses must be viewed as an unfinished agenda of expansion-driven policy responses to the 1997–1998 financial crisis. Still, these are different sets of measures from the previous crisis, which have been characterised by minimal systemic changes. The variegated responses of countries reveal hitherto unexplored policy implications for the Southeast Asian region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"294 - 317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2022.2136234\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2022.2136234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文旨在运用制度主义者的视角,比较印度尼西亚、马来西亚、菲律宾和泰国应对COVID-19的社会政策。到目前为止,危机通过临时计划扩大了社会保护,并进行了罕见的改革,为未来新政策的制度化开辟了更大的可能性。我们认为,应对COVID-19的政策必须被视为应对1997-1998年金融危机的扩张驱动型政策的未完成议程。不过,这些措施与上一次危机不同,上一次危机的特点是系统变化最小。各国的不同反应揭示了迄今为止尚未探索的对东南亚地区的政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unmasking the social policy responses of COVID-19 in four Southeast Asian Nations: institutional patterns and policy adjustment
ABSTRACT This article aimed to compare the social policy responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand using an institutionalist’s perspective. So far, the crisis expanded social protection through temporary schemes, with rare reforms, and opened greater possibilities for future institutionalisation of new policies. We argue that the COVID-19 policy responses must be viewed as an unfinished agenda of expansion-driven policy responses to the 1997–1998 financial crisis. Still, these are different sets of measures from the previous crisis, which have been characterised by minimal systemic changes. The variegated responses of countries reveal hitherto unexplored policy implications for the Southeast Asian region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信