新闻可信度:新闻来源评估的适应与检验

IF 1.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Piotr S. Bobkowski, K. Younger
{"title":"新闻可信度:新闻来源评估的适应与检验","authors":"Piotr S. Bobkowski, K. Younger","doi":"10.5860/crl.81.5.822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the development of a source evaluation assessment, and presents the results of using this instrument in a one-semester information literacy course for journalism students. The assessment was developed using the threshold concept perspective, the “authority is constructed and contextual” frame, and an established source evaluation rubric. As formative assessment, the instrument showed that students’ source evaluations lacked evidence and included ritualized language. As summative assessment, it showed that students used a greater range of indicators of authority than they used initially, and used evidence more frequently. The assessment can measure students’ source evaluations across the disciplines.","PeriodicalId":10686,"journal":{"name":"College & Research Libraries","volume":"1 1","pages":"822-843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"News Credibility: Adapting and Testing a Source Evaluation Assessment in Journalism\",\"authors\":\"Piotr S. Bobkowski, K. Younger\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/crl.81.5.822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the development of a source evaluation assessment, and presents the results of using this instrument in a one-semester information literacy course for journalism students. The assessment was developed using the threshold concept perspective, the “authority is constructed and contextual” frame, and an established source evaluation rubric. As formative assessment, the instrument showed that students’ source evaluations lacked evidence and included ritualized language. As summative assessment, it showed that students used a greater range of indicators of authority than they used initially, and used evidence more frequently. The assessment can measure students’ source evaluations across the disciplines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"College & Research Libraries\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"822-843\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"College & Research Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.5.822\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College & Research Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.5.822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文讨论了信息源评估的开发,并介绍了在一学期新闻专业学生信息素养课程中使用该工具的结果。评估是使用阈值概念视角、“权威是构建的和上下文相关的”框架和一个已建立的源评估标题来开发的。作为形成性评估,该工具显示学生的源评估缺乏证据,并且包含仪式化的语言。作为总结性评估,它表明学生们使用的权威指标范围比他们最初使用的更大,并且更频繁地使用证据。该评估可以衡量学生跨学科的源评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
News Credibility: Adapting and Testing a Source Evaluation Assessment in Journalism
This paper discusses the development of a source evaluation assessment, and presents the results of using this instrument in a one-semester information literacy course for journalism students. The assessment was developed using the threshold concept perspective, the “authority is constructed and contextual” frame, and an established source evaluation rubric. As formative assessment, the instrument showed that students’ source evaluations lacked evidence and included ritualized language. As summative assessment, it showed that students used a greater range of indicators of authority than they used initially, and used evidence more frequently. The assessment can measure students’ source evaluations across the disciplines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
College & Research Libraries
College & Research Libraries INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
63
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: College & Research Libraries (C&RL) is the official scholarly research journal of the Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association, 50 East Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. C&RL is a bimonthly, online-only publication highlighting a new C&RL study with a free, live, expert panel comprised of the study''s authors and additional subject experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信