阿波啡皮下滴注治疗帕金森病——阿波啡的有效性和安全性挑战:文献综述

Amy E. Jones, Elise M Tune
{"title":"阿波啡皮下滴注治疗帕金森病——阿波啡的有效性和安全性挑战:文献综述","authors":"Amy E. Jones, Elise M Tune","doi":"10.21307/ajon-2023-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This review examined the body of evidence to determine the efficacy of an apomorphine challenge. Its primary objective is to identify the dose of the most common adverse events involved with apomorphine challenges. The secondary objective is to determine whether a titration challenge is warranted prior to commencing Apomorphine therapy or an alternate option, such as slow titration, is more efficacious. Results: The literature review was developed using the Cochrane handbook of systematic reviews. The search yielded 157 results, only 23 were included in the final analysis. Evidence is largely lacking and traditionally anecdotal and based on clinician experience. Studies inadequately control for reporter and rater bias, have small sample sizes; high level evidence is lacking. Continuous rates range between 2-4mg/hr (Deleu, 2004) and an intermittent dose range between 4mg- 6 mg (Pahwa et al 2007); doses higher than this are likely to induce side effects. QT interval prolongation is linked with both apomorphine and domperidone use and an electrocardiogram (ECG) should be performed prior to commencing both medications. A positive result for an apomorphine challenge is determined when there is a 20% improvement from baseline score in part III of the Movement Disorder Society – Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS- UPDRS), 30 minutes after a dose is given. Lastly, review examines a theoretical way to titrate patients using the Tomlinson levodopa conversion.","PeriodicalId":32533,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"1 1","pages":"39 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apomorphine subcutaneous titration in Parkinson’s disease - the effectiveness and safety of apomorphine challenges: A Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Amy E. Jones, Elise M Tune\",\"doi\":\"10.21307/ajon-2023-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This review examined the body of evidence to determine the efficacy of an apomorphine challenge. Its primary objective is to identify the dose of the most common adverse events involved with apomorphine challenges. The secondary objective is to determine whether a titration challenge is warranted prior to commencing Apomorphine therapy or an alternate option, such as slow titration, is more efficacious. Results: The literature review was developed using the Cochrane handbook of systematic reviews. The search yielded 157 results, only 23 were included in the final analysis. Evidence is largely lacking and traditionally anecdotal and based on clinician experience. Studies inadequately control for reporter and rater bias, have small sample sizes; high level evidence is lacking. Continuous rates range between 2-4mg/hr (Deleu, 2004) and an intermittent dose range between 4mg- 6 mg (Pahwa et al 2007); doses higher than this are likely to induce side effects. QT interval prolongation is linked with both apomorphine and domperidone use and an electrocardiogram (ECG) should be performed prior to commencing both medications. A positive result for an apomorphine challenge is determined when there is a 20% improvement from baseline score in part III of the Movement Disorder Society – Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS- UPDRS), 30 minutes after a dose is given. Lastly, review examines a theoretical way to titrate patients using the Tomlinson levodopa conversion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21307/ajon-2023-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/ajon-2023-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本综述检查了大量的证据来确定阿波啡刺激的有效性。其主要目的是确定与阿帕吗啡刺激有关的最常见不良事件的剂量。次要目的是确定在开始阿波啡治疗之前是否需要滴定挑战或替代选择,如缓慢滴定,更有效。结果:文献综述采用Cochrane系统综述手册。搜索产生了157个结果,只有23个被纳入最终分析。证据在很大程度上是缺乏的,而且传统上是轶事和基于临床医生的经验。研究没有充分控制报告者和评价者的偏见,样本量小;缺乏高水平的证据。连续剂量范围为2-4mg/hr (Deleu, 2004年),间歇剂量范围为4mg- 6mg (Pahwa等,2007年);高于这个剂量可能会产生副作用。QT间期延长与阿波啡和多潘立酮的使用有关,在开始使用这两种药物之前应进行心电图检查。给药30分钟后,在运动障碍协会-统一帕金森病评定量表(MDS- UPDRS)第三部分中,当基线评分比基线评分提高20%时,确定阿帕吗啡刺激的阳性结果。最后,回顾了使用汤姆林森左旋多巴转换滴定患者的理论方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Apomorphine subcutaneous titration in Parkinson’s disease - the effectiveness and safety of apomorphine challenges: A Literature Review
Abstract This review examined the body of evidence to determine the efficacy of an apomorphine challenge. Its primary objective is to identify the dose of the most common adverse events involved with apomorphine challenges. The secondary objective is to determine whether a titration challenge is warranted prior to commencing Apomorphine therapy or an alternate option, such as slow titration, is more efficacious. Results: The literature review was developed using the Cochrane handbook of systematic reviews. The search yielded 157 results, only 23 were included in the final analysis. Evidence is largely lacking and traditionally anecdotal and based on clinician experience. Studies inadequately control for reporter and rater bias, have small sample sizes; high level evidence is lacking. Continuous rates range between 2-4mg/hr (Deleu, 2004) and an intermittent dose range between 4mg- 6 mg (Pahwa et al 2007); doses higher than this are likely to induce side effects. QT interval prolongation is linked with both apomorphine and domperidone use and an electrocardiogram (ECG) should be performed prior to commencing both medications. A positive result for an apomorphine challenge is determined when there is a 20% improvement from baseline score in part III of the Movement Disorder Society – Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS- UPDRS), 30 minutes after a dose is given. Lastly, review examines a theoretical way to titrate patients using the Tomlinson levodopa conversion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信