投资组合再平衡:权衡与决策

Xing Hong, Philipp Meyer-Brauns
{"title":"投资组合再平衡:权衡与决策","authors":"Xing Hong, Philipp Meyer-Brauns","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3858951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper identifies a clear tradeoff between tracking error — performance differences relative to a targeted asset allocation — and turnover—a proxy for rebalancing costs — that can help guide investors’ rebalancing choices. We find that calendar-based approaches, while convenient, tend to lead to less efficient rebalancing tradeoffs than rebalancing with tolerance bands. Further improvements can be gained with tiered approaches that apply different tolerance bands across and within asset classes. We do not find evidence that rebalancing choices can reliably increase expected returns. Finally, our study evaluates how rebalancing choices relate to asset allocation and how they may impact a portfolio’s maximum drawdowns and shorter-term return differences to the target allocation.","PeriodicalId":11410,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Portfolio Rebalancing: Tradeoffs and Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Xing Hong, Philipp Meyer-Brauns\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3858951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper identifies a clear tradeoff between tracking error — performance differences relative to a targeted asset allocation — and turnover—a proxy for rebalancing costs — that can help guide investors’ rebalancing choices. We find that calendar-based approaches, while convenient, tend to lead to less efficient rebalancing tradeoffs than rebalancing with tolerance bands. Further improvements can be gained with tiered approaches that apply different tolerance bands across and within asset classes. We do not find evidence that rebalancing choices can reliably increase expected returns. Finally, our study evaluates how rebalancing choices relate to asset allocation and how they may impact a portfolio’s maximum drawdowns and shorter-term return differences to the target allocation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3858951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3858951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文确定了跟踪误差(相对于目标资产配置的绩效差异)与周转率(再平衡成本的代表)之间的明确权衡,这有助于指导投资者的再平衡选择。我们发现,基于日历的方法虽然方便,但往往会导致效率较低的再平衡权衡,而不是使用公差带进行再平衡。通过在资产类别之间和内部应用不同容忍度的分层方法,可以获得进一步的改进。我们没有发现证据表明再平衡选择可以可靠地增加预期收益。最后,我们的研究评估了再平衡选择与资产配置的关系,以及它们如何影响投资组合的最大回收量和短期回报与目标配置的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Portfolio Rebalancing: Tradeoffs and Decisions
This paper identifies a clear tradeoff between tracking error — performance differences relative to a targeted asset allocation — and turnover—a proxy for rebalancing costs — that can help guide investors’ rebalancing choices. We find that calendar-based approaches, while convenient, tend to lead to less efficient rebalancing tradeoffs than rebalancing with tolerance bands. Further improvements can be gained with tiered approaches that apply different tolerance bands across and within asset classes. We do not find evidence that rebalancing choices can reliably increase expected returns. Finally, our study evaluates how rebalancing choices relate to asset allocation and how they may impact a portfolio’s maximum drawdowns and shorter-term return differences to the target allocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信