远程教育中组织学生小组作业的数字工具选择

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
O. Glazunova, A. Hurzhii, V. Korolchuk, T. Voloshyna
{"title":"远程教育中组织学生小组作业的数字工具选择","authors":"O. Glazunova, A. Hurzhii, V. Korolchuk, T. Voloshyna","doi":"10.33407/itlt.v94i2.5211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transformation of classical education into distance education has become increasingly relevant, especially given the challenging conditions posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and military operations in our country. In these circumstances, distance learning requires practical educational materials that are easily accessible to students. This paper proposes criteria and indicators for selecting digital tools that can facilitate group work with educational content in distance learning. We analyzed the tools available on the Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and Cisco Webex platforms and evaluated their suitability for managing students’ group work in distance learning in institutions of higher education at various stages of the learning process including setting tasks, designing the learning environment, facilitating group interaction and communication, managing educational content and files, promoting teamwork and productivity, and presenting results. To obtain expert assessment of the defined criteria and indicators, we engaged seventeen researchers and educators who have practical experience using digital tools in distance learning. Our study identified three important criteria for selecting digital tools for group work with educational content, namely: design, functional-technological, education-communication ones. We determined the weight of the indicators for these criteria and assessed digital tools for group work with educational content in distance learning. Digital tools such as Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace was found to be more suitable for providing group work of students in a distance learning, while Cisco Webex was found to be the most suitable tool for organizing real-time group work. Other digital tools for group work of students in distance learning can be evaluated according to defined criteria and indicators.","PeriodicalId":45205,"journal":{"name":"Information Technologies and Learning Tools","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SELECTION OF DIGITAL TOOLS FOR ORGANIZING STUDENTS' GROUP WORK IN DISTANCE EDUCATION\",\"authors\":\"O. Glazunova, A. Hurzhii, V. Korolchuk, T. Voloshyna\",\"doi\":\"10.33407/itlt.v94i2.5211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The transformation of classical education into distance education has become increasingly relevant, especially given the challenging conditions posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and military operations in our country. In these circumstances, distance learning requires practical educational materials that are easily accessible to students. This paper proposes criteria and indicators for selecting digital tools that can facilitate group work with educational content in distance learning. We analyzed the tools available on the Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and Cisco Webex platforms and evaluated their suitability for managing students’ group work in distance learning in institutions of higher education at various stages of the learning process including setting tasks, designing the learning environment, facilitating group interaction and communication, managing educational content and files, promoting teamwork and productivity, and presenting results. To obtain expert assessment of the defined criteria and indicators, we engaged seventeen researchers and educators who have practical experience using digital tools in distance learning. Our study identified three important criteria for selecting digital tools for group work with educational content, namely: design, functional-technological, education-communication ones. We determined the weight of the indicators for these criteria and assessed digital tools for group work with educational content in distance learning. Digital tools such as Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace was found to be more suitable for providing group work of students in a distance learning, while Cisco Webex was found to be the most suitable tool for organizing real-time group work. Other digital tools for group work of students in distance learning can be evaluated according to defined criteria and indicators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Technologies and Learning Tools\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Technologies and Learning Tools\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v94i2.5211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technologies and Learning Tools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v94i2.5211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

传统教育向远程教育的转变变得越来越重要,特别是考虑到COVID-19大流行和我国军事行动所带来的挑战。在这种情况下,远程学习需要学生容易获得的实用教育材料。本文提出了选择数字工具的标准和指标,这些工具可以促进远程学习中具有教育内容的小组工作。我们分析了Microsoft 365、Google Workspace和Cisco Webex平台上可用的工具,并评估了它们在高等教育机构远程学习中管理学生小组工作的适用性,这些学习过程包括设置任务、设计学习环境、促进小组互动和交流、管理教育内容和文件、促进团队合作和生产力以及展示结果。为了获得对定义的标准和指标的专家评估,我们聘请了17位具有在远程学习中使用数字工具的实践经验的研究人员和教育工作者。我们的研究确定了选择具有教育内容的小组工作数字工具的三个重要标准,即:设计,功能-技术,教育-交流。我们确定了这些标准指标的权重,并评估了远程学习中具有教育内容的小组工作的数字工具。微软365和谷歌工作空间等数字工具被发现更适合在远程学习中提供学生的小组工作,而思科Webex被发现是最适合组织实时小组工作的工具。其他用于远程学习学生小组作业的数字工具可以根据定义的标准和指标进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SELECTION OF DIGITAL TOOLS FOR ORGANIZING STUDENTS' GROUP WORK IN DISTANCE EDUCATION
The transformation of classical education into distance education has become increasingly relevant, especially given the challenging conditions posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and military operations in our country. In these circumstances, distance learning requires practical educational materials that are easily accessible to students. This paper proposes criteria and indicators for selecting digital tools that can facilitate group work with educational content in distance learning. We analyzed the tools available on the Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and Cisco Webex platforms and evaluated their suitability for managing students’ group work in distance learning in institutions of higher education at various stages of the learning process including setting tasks, designing the learning environment, facilitating group interaction and communication, managing educational content and files, promoting teamwork and productivity, and presenting results. To obtain expert assessment of the defined criteria and indicators, we engaged seventeen researchers and educators who have practical experience using digital tools in distance learning. Our study identified three important criteria for selecting digital tools for group work with educational content, namely: design, functional-technological, education-communication ones. We determined the weight of the indicators for these criteria and assessed digital tools for group work with educational content in distance learning. Digital tools such as Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace was found to be more suitable for providing group work of students in a distance learning, while Cisco Webex was found to be the most suitable tool for organizing real-time group work. Other digital tools for group work of students in distance learning can be evaluated according to defined criteria and indicators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Technologies and Learning Tools
Information Technologies and Learning Tools EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信