基于bdd的奇偶博弈求解器的比较

CoRR Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI:10.4204/EPTCS.277.8
L. Sanchez, Wieger Wesselink, T. Willemse
{"title":"基于bdd的奇偶博弈求解器的比较","authors":"L. Sanchez, Wieger Wesselink, T. Willemse","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.277.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parity games are two player games with omega-winning conditions, played on finite graphs. Such games play an important role in verification, satisfiability and synthesis. It is therefore important to identify algorithms that can efficiently deal with large games that arise from such applications. In this paper, we describe our experiments with BDD-based implementations of four parity game solving algorithms, viz. Zielonka's recursive algorithm, the more recent Priority Promotion algorithm, the Fixpoint-Iteration algorithm and the automata based APT algorithm. We compare their performance on several types of random games and on a number of cases taken from the Keiren benchmark set.","PeriodicalId":10720,"journal":{"name":"CoRR","volume":"68 12 1","pages":"103-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of BDD-Based Parity Game Solvers\",\"authors\":\"L. Sanchez, Wieger Wesselink, T. Willemse\",\"doi\":\"10.4204/EPTCS.277.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parity games are two player games with omega-winning conditions, played on finite graphs. Such games play an important role in verification, satisfiability and synthesis. It is therefore important to identify algorithms that can efficiently deal with large games that arise from such applications. In this paper, we describe our experiments with BDD-based implementations of four parity game solving algorithms, viz. Zielonka's recursive algorithm, the more recent Priority Promotion algorithm, the Fixpoint-Iteration algorithm and the automata based APT algorithm. We compare their performance on several types of random games and on a number of cases taken from the Keiren benchmark set.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CoRR\",\"volume\":\"68 12 1\",\"pages\":\"103-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CoRR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.277.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoRR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.277.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

奇偶性游戏是在有限图上进行的具有- 3获胜条件的两人游戏。这类博弈在验证性、可满足性和综合性方面发挥着重要作用。因此,识别能够有效处理此类应用产生的大型游戏的算法非常重要。在本文中,我们描述了基于bdd实现的四种奇偶对策求解算法的实验,即Zielonka的递归算法,最新的优先级提升算法,不动点迭代算法和基于自动机的APT算法。我们比较了它们在不同类型的随机游戏中的表现,以及Keiren基准集中的许多情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of BDD-Based Parity Game Solvers
Parity games are two player games with omega-winning conditions, played on finite graphs. Such games play an important role in verification, satisfiability and synthesis. It is therefore important to identify algorithms that can efficiently deal with large games that arise from such applications. In this paper, we describe our experiments with BDD-based implementations of four parity game solving algorithms, viz. Zielonka's recursive algorithm, the more recent Priority Promotion algorithm, the Fixpoint-Iteration algorithm and the automata based APT algorithm. We compare their performance on several types of random games and on a number of cases taken from the Keiren benchmark set.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信