{"title":"高流量鼻插管氧合治疗急性呼吸衰竭的疗效及与无创正压通气的比较","authors":"A. Mohamed, Ahmed Yasin Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/ejmr.2022.266288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The goal of this study is to assess HFNC oxygenation and compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) on oxygenation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The patients were randomly grouped into two groups, 20 in each group. Group 1: treated by high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and group 2: treated by non-invasive ventilation. There was a statistically significant difference regarding P a O 2 /FiO 2 at baseline and at the end ( P-value < 0.001) in both groups indicating improvement of oxygenation in both groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the P a O 2 and P a O 2 /FiO 2 ratio (P-value < 0.05) at the end of the trial however the degree of oxygenation improvement was significantly higher with NIV group. The conclusion of our study: the use of high flow nasal cannula is effective in improving oxygenation but NIV was superior to HFNC.","PeriodicalId":11524,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy Of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation In Acute Respiratory Failure Patients And Comparing With Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation\",\"authors\":\"A. Mohamed, Ahmed Yasin Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejmr.2022.266288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The goal of this study is to assess HFNC oxygenation and compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) on oxygenation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The patients were randomly grouped into two groups, 20 in each group. Group 1: treated by high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and group 2: treated by non-invasive ventilation. There was a statistically significant difference regarding P a O 2 /FiO 2 at baseline and at the end ( P-value < 0.001) in both groups indicating improvement of oxygenation in both groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the P a O 2 and P a O 2 /FiO 2 ratio (P-value < 0.05) at the end of the trial however the degree of oxygenation improvement was significantly higher with NIV group. The conclusion of our study: the use of high flow nasal cannula is effective in improving oxygenation but NIV was superior to HFNC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmr.2022.266288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmr.2022.266288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy Of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation In Acute Respiratory Failure Patients And Comparing With Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
: The goal of this study is to assess HFNC oxygenation and compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) on oxygenation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The patients were randomly grouped into two groups, 20 in each group. Group 1: treated by high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and group 2: treated by non-invasive ventilation. There was a statistically significant difference regarding P a O 2 /FiO 2 at baseline and at the end ( P-value < 0.001) in both groups indicating improvement of oxygenation in both groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the P a O 2 and P a O 2 /FiO 2 ratio (P-value < 0.05) at the end of the trial however the degree of oxygenation improvement was significantly higher with NIV group. The conclusion of our study: the use of high flow nasal cannula is effective in improving oxygenation but NIV was superior to HFNC.