利用数字环境改进完整性任务的管道维修计划

W. Sharman, Phillip Sander, Owen Hall, Jonathan Martin, John Spurlock
{"title":"利用数字环境改进完整性任务的管道维修计划","authors":"W. Sharman, Phillip Sander, Owen Hall, Jonathan Martin, John Spurlock","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the transition to a digital environment for pipeline integrity management, the traditional methods for assessment of in-line inspections (ILI) and subsequent repair planning, are progressing from a manual process of utilizing paper-based information sources and relatively simple spreadsheet calculations, to an all-encompassing digital process.\n There have been significant improvements to the management and alignment of pipeline and related inspection / survey data. The subsequent algorithms and procedures used to determine pipeline repairs need to evolve in conjunction to benefit from the extra information readily available. As part of the development of integrity management software, we made advancements in repair planning procedures and this paper describes the challenges encountered and the subsequent solutions adopted.\n The traditional approach to repair and dig site planning has been based on the ILI vendor’s dig sheet, reviewed in conjunction with the pipeline listing, allowing an integrity engineer to identify necessary repairs following an integrity assessment and repair rules adopted by the pipeline operator. It can then be determined whether multiple repair locations can be combined into a single dig site, or if a more advanced repair method is required due to the presence of other pipeline features (e.g. an existing pipeline repair). An experienced engineer, provided with sufficient information about the state of the pipeline, should be able to provide an appropriate repair solution that requires only minor adjustment once excavations begin, saving a significant amount of cost and effort for the repairs, at the expense of high efforts on the engineer’s part.","PeriodicalId":21327,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pipeline Repair Planning Using a Digital Environment to Improve Integrity Tasks\",\"authors\":\"W. Sharman, Phillip Sander, Owen Hall, Jonathan Martin, John Spurlock\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/ipc2022-87094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the transition to a digital environment for pipeline integrity management, the traditional methods for assessment of in-line inspections (ILI) and subsequent repair planning, are progressing from a manual process of utilizing paper-based information sources and relatively simple spreadsheet calculations, to an all-encompassing digital process.\\n There have been significant improvements to the management and alignment of pipeline and related inspection / survey data. The subsequent algorithms and procedures used to determine pipeline repairs need to evolve in conjunction to benefit from the extra information readily available. As part of the development of integrity management software, we made advancements in repair planning procedures and this paper describes the challenges encountered and the subsequent solutions adopted.\\n The traditional approach to repair and dig site planning has been based on the ILI vendor’s dig sheet, reviewed in conjunction with the pipeline listing, allowing an integrity engineer to identify necessary repairs following an integrity assessment and repair rules adopted by the pipeline operator. It can then be determined whether multiple repair locations can be combined into a single dig site, or if a more advanced repair method is required due to the presence of other pipeline features (e.g. an existing pipeline repair). An experienced engineer, provided with sufficient information about the state of the pipeline, should be able to provide an appropriate repair solution that requires only minor adjustment once excavations begin, saving a significant amount of cost and effort for the repairs, at the expense of high efforts on the engineer’s part.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在管道完整性管理向数字化环境过渡的过程中,传统的在线检查(ILI)评估和后续维修计划的方法正在从利用纸质信息源和相对简单的电子表格计算的手动过程发展到全面的数字化过程。对管道和相关检查/调查数据的管理和校准有了重大改进。用于确定管道维修的后续算法和程序需要共同发展,以从现成的额外信息中获益。作为完整性管理软件开发的一部分,我们在维修计划程序方面取得了进展,本文描述了遇到的挑战和随后采取的解决方案。传统的修复和挖掘现场规划方法是基于ILI供应商的挖掘表,并结合管道清单进行审查,使完整性工程师能够根据管道运营商采用的完整性评估和修复规则确定必要的修复。然后可以确定是否可以将多个修复地点合并为一个挖掘地点,或者由于存在其他管道特征(例如现有管道修复),是否需要更先进的修复方法。一个有经验的工程师,如果对管道的状态有足够的了解,应该能够提供一个合适的修复方案,一旦挖掘开始,只需要进行微小的调整,节省大量的维修成本和精力,而牺牲了工程师的高度努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pipeline Repair Planning Using a Digital Environment to Improve Integrity Tasks
In the transition to a digital environment for pipeline integrity management, the traditional methods for assessment of in-line inspections (ILI) and subsequent repair planning, are progressing from a manual process of utilizing paper-based information sources and relatively simple spreadsheet calculations, to an all-encompassing digital process. There have been significant improvements to the management and alignment of pipeline and related inspection / survey data. The subsequent algorithms and procedures used to determine pipeline repairs need to evolve in conjunction to benefit from the extra information readily available. As part of the development of integrity management software, we made advancements in repair planning procedures and this paper describes the challenges encountered and the subsequent solutions adopted. The traditional approach to repair and dig site planning has been based on the ILI vendor’s dig sheet, reviewed in conjunction with the pipeline listing, allowing an integrity engineer to identify necessary repairs following an integrity assessment and repair rules adopted by the pipeline operator. It can then be determined whether multiple repair locations can be combined into a single dig site, or if a more advanced repair method is required due to the presence of other pipeline features (e.g. an existing pipeline repair). An experienced engineer, provided with sufficient information about the state of the pipeline, should be able to provide an appropriate repair solution that requires only minor adjustment once excavations begin, saving a significant amount of cost and effort for the repairs, at the expense of high efforts on the engineer’s part.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信