欧格斯·兰斯莫斯的《圣鹿之杀》:欧里庇得斯的《伊菲盖尼亚》在奥利斯的当代接受

Svitlana Pereplotchykova
{"title":"欧格斯·兰斯莫斯的《圣鹿之杀》:欧里庇得斯的《伊菲盖尼亚》在奥利斯的当代接受","authors":"Svitlana Pereplotchykova","doi":"10.17721/1728-2659.2023.33.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ancient Greek subjects preserve their relevance in our times through their timeless, profound and comprehensive consideration of the human soul and interpersonal relations, which remain unchanged throughout the centuries in accordance with human nature. Euripides’ tragedy Iphigenia in Aulis has not been exploited often by later writers and film makers who have focused mainly on the murder of the King of Mycenae, Agamemnon, and the destiny of the dynasty of the Atreidae in accordance with Aeschylus’ trilogy. Nevertheless, one of the main reasons for the murder of Agamemnon by his wife Clytemnestra is his sacrifice of their daughter Iphigenia, the story of which is told by Euripides in his tragedies Iphigenia in Aulis and Iphigenia in Tauris. In Yorgos Lanthimos’ film The Killing of a Sacred Deer (2017) the main character Steven, just like Agamemnon, is informed of the will of the gods who demand sacrifice to be given. The carefully considered reasons which led Agamemnon and Steven to face an inevitable choice highlight their common character features, with hubris the decisive one among them. Comparison of the texts under analysis shows that acceptance of the inevitability of the situation by the families of the main characters develops through the classical stages from denial to understanding that nothing else depends on them. And while in Euripides’ tragedy the plot device of a “deus ex machina” is exploited, as the gods are satisfied with the acceptance of the inevitability of sacrifice, in the film one of the members of the family actually dies in order for order to be restored, because a murder presupposes atonement through the blood of another. This reception of Euripides’ tragedy is of particular interest because Yorgos Lanthimos is Greek by origin who at a certain moment of his career decided to move away from his native Greek space and start creating films for a more general Western audience. This paper analyses how, in this post-modernist multimodal film text expressive means from Ancient Greek theatre are combined with elements of modern cinema.","PeriodicalId":33822,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YORGOS LANTHIMOS’ THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER: CONTEMPORARY RECEPTION OF EURIPIDES’ IPHIGENIA IN AULIS\",\"authors\":\"Svitlana Pereplotchykova\",\"doi\":\"10.17721/1728-2659.2023.33.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ancient Greek subjects preserve their relevance in our times through their timeless, profound and comprehensive consideration of the human soul and interpersonal relations, which remain unchanged throughout the centuries in accordance with human nature. Euripides’ tragedy Iphigenia in Aulis has not been exploited often by later writers and film makers who have focused mainly on the murder of the King of Mycenae, Agamemnon, and the destiny of the dynasty of the Atreidae in accordance with Aeschylus’ trilogy. Nevertheless, one of the main reasons for the murder of Agamemnon by his wife Clytemnestra is his sacrifice of their daughter Iphigenia, the story of which is told by Euripides in his tragedies Iphigenia in Aulis and Iphigenia in Tauris. In Yorgos Lanthimos’ film The Killing of a Sacred Deer (2017) the main character Steven, just like Agamemnon, is informed of the will of the gods who demand sacrifice to be given. The carefully considered reasons which led Agamemnon and Steven to face an inevitable choice highlight their common character features, with hubris the decisive one among them. Comparison of the texts under analysis shows that acceptance of the inevitability of the situation by the families of the main characters develops through the classical stages from denial to understanding that nothing else depends on them. And while in Euripides’ tragedy the plot device of a “deus ex machina” is exploited, as the gods are satisfied with the acceptance of the inevitability of sacrifice, in the film one of the members of the family actually dies in order for order to be restored, because a murder presupposes atonement through the blood of another. This reception of Euripides’ tragedy is of particular interest because Yorgos Lanthimos is Greek by origin who at a certain moment of his career decided to move away from his native Greek space and start creating films for a more general Western audience. This paper analyses how, in this post-modernist multimodal film text expressive means from Ancient Greek theatre are combined with elements of modern cinema.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2659.2023.33.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2659.2023.33.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古希腊主题通过对人类灵魂和人际关系的永恒、深刻和全面的考虑,在我们这个时代保持着相关性,这些考虑在几个世纪以来一直保持不变,符合人类的本性。欧里庇得斯的悲剧《奥里斯的伊菲革涅亚》并没有被后来的作家和电影制片人利用,他们主要关注于迈锡尼国王阿伽门农的谋杀,以及根据埃斯库罗斯的三部曲,阿特雷达王朝的命运。然而,阿伽门农被他的妻子克吕泰涅斯特拉谋杀的主要原因之一是他牺牲了他们的女儿伊菲革涅亚,这个故事是欧里庇得斯在他的悲剧《奥里斯的伊菲革涅亚》和《陶里斯的伊菲革涅亚》中讲述的。在欧格斯·兰斯莫斯的电影《圣鹿之死》(2017)中,主角史蒂文就像阿伽门农一样,被告知神的意愿,要求做出牺牲。导致阿伽门农和史蒂文面临不可避免的选择的深思熟虑的原因突出了他们共同的性格特征,其中决定性的是傲慢。通过对所分析文本的比较可以看出,主人公家庭对这种情况的必然性的接受经历了从否认到理解没有其他依赖于他们的古典阶段。而在欧里庇德斯的悲剧中,当众神对牺牲的必然性的接受感到满意时,“上帝的救赎”的情节装置被利用了,在电影中,家庭成员中的一个实际上是为了恢复秩序而死亡的,因为谋杀的先决条件是通过另一个人的血来赎罪。这种对欧里庇得斯悲剧的接受是特别有趣的,因为Yorgos Lanthimos是希腊人,在他职业生涯的某个时刻,他决定离开他的希腊故乡,开始为更普通的西方观众创作电影。本文分析了在这种后现代主义的多模态电影文本中,古希腊戏剧的表现手法如何与现代电影的元素相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
YORGOS LANTHIMOS’ THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER: CONTEMPORARY RECEPTION OF EURIPIDES’ IPHIGENIA IN AULIS
Ancient Greek subjects preserve their relevance in our times through their timeless, profound and comprehensive consideration of the human soul and interpersonal relations, which remain unchanged throughout the centuries in accordance with human nature. Euripides’ tragedy Iphigenia in Aulis has not been exploited often by later writers and film makers who have focused mainly on the murder of the King of Mycenae, Agamemnon, and the destiny of the dynasty of the Atreidae in accordance with Aeschylus’ trilogy. Nevertheless, one of the main reasons for the murder of Agamemnon by his wife Clytemnestra is his sacrifice of their daughter Iphigenia, the story of which is told by Euripides in his tragedies Iphigenia in Aulis and Iphigenia in Tauris. In Yorgos Lanthimos’ film The Killing of a Sacred Deer (2017) the main character Steven, just like Agamemnon, is informed of the will of the gods who demand sacrifice to be given. The carefully considered reasons which led Agamemnon and Steven to face an inevitable choice highlight their common character features, with hubris the decisive one among them. Comparison of the texts under analysis shows that acceptance of the inevitability of the situation by the families of the main characters develops through the classical stages from denial to understanding that nothing else depends on them. And while in Euripides’ tragedy the plot device of a “deus ex machina” is exploited, as the gods are satisfied with the acceptance of the inevitability of sacrifice, in the film one of the members of the family actually dies in order for order to be restored, because a murder presupposes atonement through the blood of another. This reception of Euripides’ tragedy is of particular interest because Yorgos Lanthimos is Greek by origin who at a certain moment of his career decided to move away from his native Greek space and start creating films for a more general Western audience. This paper analyses how, in this post-modernist multimodal film text expressive means from Ancient Greek theatre are combined with elements of modern cinema.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信