开发并实施一种工具,用于评估学习光学仪器物理材料时的批判性思维和视觉表现

Dewi Nurulhasni, Eka Ayu Nurbaiti, Rosa Safirotun Nabila, J. Jumadi
{"title":"开发并实施一种工具,用于评估学习光学仪器物理材料时的批判性思维和视觉表现","authors":"Dewi Nurulhasni, Eka Ayu Nurbaiti, Rosa Safirotun Nabila, J. Jumadi","doi":"10.21831/pep.v27i1.53550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to develop an assessment instrument to measure students' critical thinking and visual representation abilities in optical instrument material. This research and development (RD) employed the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) instructional model. This research develops a test instrument that has more specific stages so the ADDIE development stage is integrated with the development stage of the test instrument developed by Mardapi. The subjects in this study are grade XI students of State Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) 4 Bantul. This study produced a test instrument for measuring students' critical thinking and visual representation abilities, with high validity,and analyzed using Aiken's V. The items for assessing critical thinking and visual representation abilities were analyzed using the QUEST program with the following findings. (1) The analysis results of instrument validation using Aiken's V obtained an average Aiken's Value above 0.4 with high validity and moderate validity criteria so all items are valid. (2) The pre-test analysis on item estimates obtained MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 and the value of outfit t ≤ 2 and in the MNSQ Infit case estimates in the range 0.77-1.30, so overall, the items matched to Rasch models. (3) Post-test analysis on item estimates obtained MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 and outfit t value ≤ 2 and in case estimates MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 so, overall, items are in accordance with Rasch models. (4) The reliability of the pre-test items is 0.92 while the reliability of the post-test items is 0.76. (5) The difficulty level of the items in the pre-test results shows that Question 10 is the most difficult while number 3 is the easiest, and in the post-test results, Question 8 is the most difficult while Question 6 is the easiest.","PeriodicalId":33364,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and implementing an instrument for assessing critical thinking and visual representations in learning Physics materials of Optical Instruments\",\"authors\":\"Dewi Nurulhasni, Eka Ayu Nurbaiti, Rosa Safirotun Nabila, J. Jumadi\",\"doi\":\"10.21831/pep.v27i1.53550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to develop an assessment instrument to measure students' critical thinking and visual representation abilities in optical instrument material. This research and development (RD) employed the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) instructional model. This research develops a test instrument that has more specific stages so the ADDIE development stage is integrated with the development stage of the test instrument developed by Mardapi. The subjects in this study are grade XI students of State Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) 4 Bantul. This study produced a test instrument for measuring students' critical thinking and visual representation abilities, with high validity,and analyzed using Aiken's V. The items for assessing critical thinking and visual representation abilities were analyzed using the QUEST program with the following findings. (1) The analysis results of instrument validation using Aiken's V obtained an average Aiken's Value above 0.4 with high validity and moderate validity criteria so all items are valid. (2) The pre-test analysis on item estimates obtained MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 and the value of outfit t ≤ 2 and in the MNSQ Infit case estimates in the range 0.77-1.30, so overall, the items matched to Rasch models. (3) Post-test analysis on item estimates obtained MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 and outfit t value ≤ 2 and in case estimates MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 so, overall, items are in accordance with Rasch models. (4) The reliability of the pre-test items is 0.92 while the reliability of the post-test items is 0.76. (5) The difficulty level of the items in the pre-test results shows that Question 10 is the most difficult while number 3 is the easiest, and in the post-test results, Question 8 is the most difficult while Question 6 is the easiest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i1.53550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i1.53550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在开发一套测量学生对光学仪器材料的批判性思维和视觉表征能力的评估工具。这项研究和开发(RD)采用了ADDIE(分析、设计、开发、实施和评估)教学模型。本研究开发的测试仪器具有更具体的阶段,因此ADDIE的开发阶段与Mardapi开发的测试仪器的开发阶段相结合。本研究的对象是班图尔国立伊斯兰学校(MAN) 4年级的11年级学生。本研究制作了一个测量学生批判性思维和视觉表征能力的测试工具,具有高效度,并使用Aiken's v进行分析。(1)采用Aiken’s V进行仪器验证的分析结果,平均Aiken’s Value在0.4以上,效度标准高,效度标准中,所有项目均有效。(2)项目估计的前测分析得到MNSQ Infit在0.77 ~ 1.30范围内,装备t≤2的值在0.77 ~ 1.30范围内,因此总体上,项目与Rasch模型相匹配。(3)对项目估计的后测分析得到MNSQ Infit在0.77 ~ 1.30范围内,装备t值≤2,案例估计的MNSQ Infit在0.77 ~ 1.30范围内,总体上项目符合Rasch模型。(4)前测项目信度为0.92,后测项目信度为0.76。(5)从前测结果的题目难度程度来看,第10题最难,第3题最简单;后测结果中,第8题最难,第6题最简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing and implementing an instrument for assessing critical thinking and visual representations in learning Physics materials of Optical Instruments
This study aims to develop an assessment instrument to measure students' critical thinking and visual representation abilities in optical instrument material. This research and development (RD) employed the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) instructional model. This research develops a test instrument that has more specific stages so the ADDIE development stage is integrated with the development stage of the test instrument developed by Mardapi. The subjects in this study are grade XI students of State Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) 4 Bantul. This study produced a test instrument for measuring students' critical thinking and visual representation abilities, with high validity,and analyzed using Aiken's V. The items for assessing critical thinking and visual representation abilities were analyzed using the QUEST program with the following findings. (1) The analysis results of instrument validation using Aiken's V obtained an average Aiken's Value above 0.4 with high validity and moderate validity criteria so all items are valid. (2) The pre-test analysis on item estimates obtained MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 and the value of outfit t ≤ 2 and in the MNSQ Infit case estimates in the range 0.77-1.30, so overall, the items matched to Rasch models. (3) Post-test analysis on item estimates obtained MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 and outfit t value ≤ 2 and in case estimates MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 so, overall, items are in accordance with Rasch models. (4) The reliability of the pre-test items is 0.92 while the reliability of the post-test items is 0.76. (5) The difficulty level of the items in the pre-test results shows that Question 10 is the most difficult while number 3 is the easiest, and in the post-test results, Question 8 is the most difficult while Question 6 is the easiest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信