PP25现场跨专业模拟-“LeedsEDSim”汇报过程

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
Catherine Holmes, A. Davies, M. Elsheikh
{"title":"PP25现场跨专业模拟-“LeedsEDSim”汇报过程","authors":"Catherine Holmes, A. Davies, M. Elsheikh","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The ‘LeedsEDSimulation’ Team run an embedded in-situ interprofessional simulation (IIS) programme in the Emergency Departments(ED). A vital part of the simulation process is the debrief of the team involved. Two frameworks/prompts were created to optimise this process and aid faculty development. Summary 18 months detailed observation of debriefing practices of regular faculty members and a selection of debrief structures were evaluated - Eppich et al’s1 seemed the best aligned. This led to the development of our own bespoke debriefing framework. (Figure 1) A ‘debrief of the debrief’(DotD) session has been introduced after the candidates leave. This enhances faculty development and continued professional development and encourages sharing of experiences. A prompt has been developed from Runnacle et al’s2 framework. (Figure 1) After 9 months use (August 2019– March 2020), feedback was sought via questionnaire from faculty for evaluation as a means of continuous improvement. Results 16 replies were received from faculty. When asked ‘how helpful do you find the debrief framework?’, an average score of 4.3 (out of 5) was given (all 16 had used this tool). General comments suggested that the framework was easy to follow, well-structured and a welcome reminder of how to debrief optimally. However, one comment suggested it was only of use to novice debriefers. When asked ‘how helpful do you find the DotD prompt?’, an average score of 4.1 (out of 5) was given by 9/16 who had used the tool. The majority of comments were positive with many finding this peer feedback helpful but also that giving the feedback aided in their own debriefing development. There was a suggestion that formal training in this prompt may be beneficial and that it may be too complex. Discussion and Conclusion Results from faculty who are using frameworks suggested that the LeedsEDSimulation debrief framework and DotD prompt was welcomed and useful for faculty of ED IIS. It may need to be clarified, particularly for more experienced debriefers, that it is not a rigid structure but a flexible guide. References Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS). Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc 2015;10(2):106–15. Runnacles J, Thomas L, Sevdalis N, Kneebone R, Arora S. Development of a tool to improve performance debriefing and learning: The paediatric objective structured assessment of debriefing (OSAD) tool. Postgrad Med J 2014;90(1069):613–21.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PP25 In-situ interprofessional simulation – ‘LeedsEDSim’ debriefing process\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Holmes, A. Davies, M. Elsheikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The ‘LeedsEDSimulation’ Team run an embedded in-situ interprofessional simulation (IIS) programme in the Emergency Departments(ED). A vital part of the simulation process is the debrief of the team involved. Two frameworks/prompts were created to optimise this process and aid faculty development. Summary 18 months detailed observation of debriefing practices of regular faculty members and a selection of debrief structures were evaluated - Eppich et al’s1 seemed the best aligned. This led to the development of our own bespoke debriefing framework. (Figure 1) A ‘debrief of the debrief’(DotD) session has been introduced after the candidates leave. This enhances faculty development and continued professional development and encourages sharing of experiences. A prompt has been developed from Runnacle et al’s2 framework. (Figure 1) After 9 months use (August 2019– March 2020), feedback was sought via questionnaire from faculty for evaluation as a means of continuous improvement. Results 16 replies were received from faculty. When asked ‘how helpful do you find the debrief framework?’, an average score of 4.3 (out of 5) was given (all 16 had used this tool). General comments suggested that the framework was easy to follow, well-structured and a welcome reminder of how to debrief optimally. However, one comment suggested it was only of use to novice debriefers. When asked ‘how helpful do you find the DotD prompt?’, an average score of 4.1 (out of 5) was given by 9/16 who had used the tool. The majority of comments were positive with many finding this peer feedback helpful but also that giving the feedback aided in their own debriefing development. There was a suggestion that formal training in this prompt may be beneficial and that it may be too complex. Discussion and Conclusion Results from faculty who are using frameworks suggested that the LeedsEDSimulation debrief framework and DotD prompt was welcomed and useful for faculty of ED IIS. It may need to be clarified, particularly for more experienced debriefers, that it is not a rigid structure but a flexible guide. References Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS). Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc 2015;10(2):106–15. Runnacles J, Thomas L, Sevdalis N, Kneebone R, Arora S. Development of a tool to improve performance debriefing and learning: The paediatric objective structured assessment of debriefing (OSAD) tool. Postgrad Med J 2014;90(1069):613–21.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“LeedsEDSimulation”团队在急诊科(ED)运行嵌入式现场跨专业模拟(IIS)程序。模拟过程的一个重要部分是对相关团队进行汇报。创建了两个框架/提示来优化这一过程并帮助教师发展。18个月来,对常规教员的汇报实践进行了详细观察,并对一些汇报结构进行了评估——Eppich等人的1似乎是最一致的。这导致了我们自己定制的汇报框架的发展。(图1)在候选人离开后,引入了“汇报的汇报”(DotD)环节。这促进了教师的发展和持续的专业发展,并鼓励分享经验。从Runnacle等人的2框架中开发了一个提示符。(图1)经过9个月的使用(2019年8月至2020年3月),我们通过调查问卷向教师征求反馈意见,以进行评估,作为持续改进的手段。结果共收到教师回复16份。当被问及“你觉得汇报框架有多大帮助?”,平均得分为4.3分(满分5分)(所有16人都使用过这个工具)。一般意见认为,该框架易于遵循,结构良好,并且是如何以最佳方式进行汇报的一个受欢迎的提醒。然而,有人评论说,它只对新手汇报者有用。当被问及“你觉得DotD提示符有多大帮助?”,使用该工具的人中有9/16人的平均得分为4.1分(满分5分)。大多数评论都是积极的,许多人认为同行的反馈很有帮助,而且给予反馈也有助于他们自己的汇报发展。有人建议,这方面的正式培训可能是有益的,但可能过于复杂。使用框架的教师的结果表明,LeedsEDSimulation汇报框架和DotD提示对ED IIS的教师来说是受欢迎和有用的。可能需要澄清的是,特别是对于更有经验的汇报者来说,这不是一个僵化的结构,而是一个灵活的指南。Eppich W, Cheng A.促进卓越与反思性学习(PEARLS)。仿真医疗[J] .仿真医疗,2015;10(2):106-15。Runnacles J, Thomas L, Sevdalis N, knebone R, Arora S.改进绩效汇报和学习的工具开发:儿科客观结构化汇报评估(OSAD)工具。中华医学杂志,2014;39(6):613 - 621。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PP25 In-situ interprofessional simulation – ‘LeedsEDSim’ debriefing process
Background The ‘LeedsEDSimulation’ Team run an embedded in-situ interprofessional simulation (IIS) programme in the Emergency Departments(ED). A vital part of the simulation process is the debrief of the team involved. Two frameworks/prompts were created to optimise this process and aid faculty development. Summary 18 months detailed observation of debriefing practices of regular faculty members and a selection of debrief structures were evaluated - Eppich et al’s1 seemed the best aligned. This led to the development of our own bespoke debriefing framework. (Figure 1) A ‘debrief of the debrief’(DotD) session has been introduced after the candidates leave. This enhances faculty development and continued professional development and encourages sharing of experiences. A prompt has been developed from Runnacle et al’s2 framework. (Figure 1) After 9 months use (August 2019– March 2020), feedback was sought via questionnaire from faculty for evaluation as a means of continuous improvement. Results 16 replies were received from faculty. When asked ‘how helpful do you find the debrief framework?’, an average score of 4.3 (out of 5) was given (all 16 had used this tool). General comments suggested that the framework was easy to follow, well-structured and a welcome reminder of how to debrief optimally. However, one comment suggested it was only of use to novice debriefers. When asked ‘how helpful do you find the DotD prompt?’, an average score of 4.1 (out of 5) was given by 9/16 who had used the tool. The majority of comments were positive with many finding this peer feedback helpful but also that giving the feedback aided in their own debriefing development. There was a suggestion that formal training in this prompt may be beneficial and that it may be too complex. Discussion and Conclusion Results from faculty who are using frameworks suggested that the LeedsEDSimulation debrief framework and DotD prompt was welcomed and useful for faculty of ED IIS. It may need to be clarified, particularly for more experienced debriefers, that it is not a rigid structure but a flexible guide. References Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS). Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc 2015;10(2):106–15. Runnacles J, Thomas L, Sevdalis N, Kneebone R, Arora S. Development of a tool to improve performance debriefing and learning: The paediatric objective structured assessment of debriefing (OSAD) tool. Postgrad Med J 2014;90(1069):613–21.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信