PP20.002一个简单的干预增加亚急性病房患者ACP讨论的机会

Ivan Declarador, Noe Cangco, B. Azucena
{"title":"PP20.002一个简单的干预增加亚急性病房患者ACP讨论的机会","authors":"Ivan Declarador, Noe Cangco, B. Azucena","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-acp.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThere has been increasing focus in improving care for the elderly as the population in Singapore ages. Advance care planning (ACP) is an effective way in improving the quality of life especially in the frail elderly. Review of published literature has shown a large discrepancy in the proportion of elderly patients who are keen to do ACP versus the number of ACP facilitation that is done. One barrier is the lack of opportunity to discuss ACP as there are other competing acute medical issues. Other literature has also shown that increasing frailty and a change in social circumstances such as transitioning to a long-term care facility are common catalysts for initiating ACP discussions.MethodsIn this quality improvement project, we targeted patients under General Medicine who are admitted in the subacute wards. A prompt to ask if ACP is appropriate was added in the screening checklist before the patients are transferred to the subacute wards. All patients who are already admitted in the subacute wards are also screened for frailty and ACP discussion is offered to those who score 7 and above in the Clinical Frailty Score (CFS).We reviewed the number of ACP facilitation in the subacute ward for the period of 2017–2019. We have excluded the numbers after 2019 as the subacute wards were closed during the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsThe number of ACP facilitations increased from 20 in 2017 to 61 and 73 for 2018 and 2019, respectively. Our experience has shown that the number of ACP discussion has increased significantly and remained sustained after 2 years.ConclusionThe number of ACP facilitation can be improved amongst frail and elderly by increasing the opportunities for ACP discussions. This can be achieved by incorporating simple prompts in existing work processes.","PeriodicalId":20317,"journal":{"name":"Poster Discussion Abstracts","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PP20.002 A simple intervention to increase opportunities for ACP discussion amongst patients in the subacute wards\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Declarador, Noe Cangco, B. Azucena\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2023-acp.118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThere has been increasing focus in improving care for the elderly as the population in Singapore ages. Advance care planning (ACP) is an effective way in improving the quality of life especially in the frail elderly. Review of published literature has shown a large discrepancy in the proportion of elderly patients who are keen to do ACP versus the number of ACP facilitation that is done. One barrier is the lack of opportunity to discuss ACP as there are other competing acute medical issues. Other literature has also shown that increasing frailty and a change in social circumstances such as transitioning to a long-term care facility are common catalysts for initiating ACP discussions.MethodsIn this quality improvement project, we targeted patients under General Medicine who are admitted in the subacute wards. A prompt to ask if ACP is appropriate was added in the screening checklist before the patients are transferred to the subacute wards. All patients who are already admitted in the subacute wards are also screened for frailty and ACP discussion is offered to those who score 7 and above in the Clinical Frailty Score (CFS).We reviewed the number of ACP facilitation in the subacute ward for the period of 2017–2019. We have excluded the numbers after 2019 as the subacute wards were closed during the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsThe number of ACP facilitations increased from 20 in 2017 to 61 and 73 for 2018 and 2019, respectively. Our experience has shown that the number of ACP discussion has increased significantly and remained sustained after 2 years.ConclusionThe number of ACP facilitation can be improved amongst frail and elderly by increasing the opportunities for ACP discussions. This can be achieved by incorporating simple prompts in existing work processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poster Discussion Abstracts\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poster Discussion Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-acp.118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poster Discussion Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-acp.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着新加坡人口的老龄化,人们越来越关注改善对老年人的照顾。提前护理计划(ACP)是提高老年人生活质量的有效途径。对已发表文献的回顾显示,渴望行ACP的老年患者比例与行ACP促进的数量存在很大差异。一个障碍是缺乏讨论ACP的机会,因为还有其他紧迫的医疗问题。其他文献也表明,越来越脆弱和社会环境的变化,如过渡到长期护理机构,是启动ACP讨论的常见催化剂。方法本质量改进项目以普通内科亚急性病房住院患者为研究对象。在患者转到亚急性病房之前,在筛查清单中增加了询问ACP是否合适的提示。所有已经入住亚急性病房的患者也会进行虚弱筛查,并对临床虚弱评分(CFS)为7分及以上的患者进行ACP讨论。我们回顾了2017-2019年亚急性病房ACP促进的数量。我们排除了2019年之后的数字,因为亚急性病房在COVID-19大流行期间关闭。结果ACP设施数量从2017年的20家增加到2018年的61家和2019年的73家。我们的经验表明,ACP讨论的次数显著增加,并在两年后保持持续。结论通过增加ACP讨论的机会,可以提高体弱多病和老年人的ACP促进次数。这可以通过在现有的工作流程中合并简单的提示来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PP20.002 A simple intervention to increase opportunities for ACP discussion amongst patients in the subacute wards
BackgroundThere has been increasing focus in improving care for the elderly as the population in Singapore ages. Advance care planning (ACP) is an effective way in improving the quality of life especially in the frail elderly. Review of published literature has shown a large discrepancy in the proportion of elderly patients who are keen to do ACP versus the number of ACP facilitation that is done. One barrier is the lack of opportunity to discuss ACP as there are other competing acute medical issues. Other literature has also shown that increasing frailty and a change in social circumstances such as transitioning to a long-term care facility are common catalysts for initiating ACP discussions.MethodsIn this quality improvement project, we targeted patients under General Medicine who are admitted in the subacute wards. A prompt to ask if ACP is appropriate was added in the screening checklist before the patients are transferred to the subacute wards. All patients who are already admitted in the subacute wards are also screened for frailty and ACP discussion is offered to those who score 7 and above in the Clinical Frailty Score (CFS).We reviewed the number of ACP facilitation in the subacute ward for the period of 2017–2019. We have excluded the numbers after 2019 as the subacute wards were closed during the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsThe number of ACP facilitations increased from 20 in 2017 to 61 and 73 for 2018 and 2019, respectively. Our experience has shown that the number of ACP discussion has increased significantly and remained sustained after 2 years.ConclusionThe number of ACP facilitation can be improved amongst frail and elderly by increasing the opportunities for ACP discussions. This can be achieved by incorporating simple prompts in existing work processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信