冠状病毒危机

Q4 Medicine

Jahr Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21860/j.13.1.5

M. Knaup

{"title":"冠状病毒危机","authors":"M. Knaup","doi":"10.21860/j.13.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since spring 2020 at the latest many things are not as they used to be before – things are literally “de-ranged”. The news are mostly dominated by one topic: a virus which is officially called SARS-CoV-2.1 The here presented contribution views the Corona crisis from an ethical-philosophical perspective. At first, different challenges and dynamics of this crisis will be discussed. Insofar as political decision-making for coping with the crisis happens frequently by referring to “the” sciences, light is shed on the tasks of the sciences in our modern knowledge society. The contribution is going to argue in favour of a variety of perspectives, which we need in order to handle the crisis appropriately. In this context, light is shed on explicit and implicit basic social attitudes such as the attitude towards death as well as on the increasing medicalisation of life. Finally, the question about prospects which might be promising for the future is going to be raised.","PeriodicalId":37490,"journal":{"name":"Jahr","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Corona Crisis\",\"authors\":\"M. Knaup\",\"doi\":\"10.21860/j.13.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since spring 2020 at the latest many things are not as they used to be before – things are literally “de-ranged”. The news are mostly dominated by one topic: a virus which is officially called SARS-CoV-2.1 The here presented contribution views the Corona crisis from an ethical-philosophical perspective. At first, different challenges and dynamics of this crisis will be discussed. Insofar as political decision-making for coping with the crisis happens frequently by referring to “the” sciences, light is shed on the tasks of the sciences in our modern knowledge society. The contribution is going to argue in favour of a variety of perspectives, which we need in order to handle the crisis appropriately. In this context, light is shed on explicit and implicit basic social attitudes such as the attitude towards death as well as on the increasing medicalisation of life. Finally, the question about prospects which might be promising for the future is going to be raised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jahr\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jahr\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21860/j.13.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21860/j.13.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

最迟从2020年春季开始，许多事情都不像以前那样了——事情实际上是“去范围化”了。这些新闻大多被一个主题所主导:一种正式名称为SARS-CoV-2.1的病毒。本文从伦理哲学的角度来看待冠状病毒危机。首先，将讨论这场危机的不同挑战和动态。只要应对危机的政治决策经常涉及“科学”，就可以看出科学在我们现代知识社会中的任务。这篇文章将支持各种各样的观点，我们需要这些观点来恰当地应对危机。在这种情况下，阐明了明确的和隐含的基本社会态度，例如对死亡的态度以及对生命日益医学化的态度。最后，关于未来前景的问题可能会被提出。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Corona Crisis

Since spring 2020 at the latest many things are not as they used to be before – things are literally “de-ranged”. The news are mostly dominated by one topic: a virus which is officially called SARS-CoV-2.1 The here presented contribution views the Corona crisis from an ethical-philosophical perspective. At first, different challenges and dynamics of this crisis will be discussed. Insofar as political decision-making for coping with the crisis happens frequently by referring to “the” sciences, light is shed on the tasks of the sciences in our modern knowledge society. The contribution is going to argue in favour of a variety of perspectives, which we need in order to handle the crisis appropriately. In this context, light is shed on explicit and implicit basic social attitudes such as the attitude towards death as well as on the increasing medicalisation of life. Finally, the question about prospects which might be promising for the future is going to be raised.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Jahr Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： JAHR – EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS is a journal that deals with a wide range of bioethical topics. The aim of the Editorial Board is to publish articles related to bioethics in social sciences (sociology, psychology, law, political science, information and communication sciences, pedagogy, education and rehabilitation sciences, speech-language pathology, kinesiology, demography, social activities, security and defence sciences, economics), humanities (philosophy, theology, philology, history, art history, archaeology, ethnology and anthropology, religious sciences), biomedical (medicine, public health, veterinary medicine, dentistry and pharmacology), but also in other sciences. The journal is published twice a year.