也门亚丁部分品牌盐酸左西替利嗪薄膜包衣片质量及等效性评价

S. S. Al-Kubati, Olfat Saleh Ahmed, R. M. Saif
{"title":"也门亚丁部分品牌盐酸左西替利嗪薄膜包衣片质量及等效性评价","authors":"S. S. Al-Kubati, Olfat Saleh Ahmed, R. M. Saif","doi":"10.47372/ejua-ba.2022.4.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generic drugs are less expensive than innovator drugs, and their proliferation has become a problem in low-income countries. They need to be therapeutically and pharmaceutically equivalent to the innovator. Levocetirizine dihydrochloride is an effective drug for relieving the signs of chronic urticaria, perennial allergic rhinitis, and seasonal allergic rhinitis. Our investigation into this drug in private pharmacies in Aden, Yemen, revealed that it is sold under the names of 28 brands from different countries of origin. Because of this, it is difficult for medical professionals and patients who use this medication without a prescription to select a suitable, safe, and cost-effective drug product. We assessed the quality and equivalency of six different brands of levocetirizine dihydrochloride film-coated tablets and assigned codes A, B, C, D, E, and F, with Brand A serving as the reference. The UV analytical method was evaluated for quantifying the drug from the tablets. The results indicated that it was accurate and precise. The tablets were evaluated for weight variation, thickness, hardness, friability, drug content, disintegration time, and dissolution. In order to compare the drug's dissolving profiles, the difference factor (f1) and similarity factor (f2) were used. For all six brands, the physicochemical parameter results met the acceptable limits. All six brands showed evidence of dissolving within 15 minutes, with values ranging from 80.05 ±0.81 to 103.83 ±0.90 which were within the recommended value of 80% within 30 minutes for oral solid dosage forms intended for immediate release. According to the f1 and f2 results, only brands B, D, and E were comparable to brand A and could be used interchangeably. In conclusion, four of the six brands are interchangeable. For high-quality public health, a thorough analysis and ongoing monitoring are needed to ascertain the quality and equivalency of the medications marketed under various brands.","PeriodicalId":11552,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of University of Aden for Basic and Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EVALUATION OF SOME BRANDS OF LEVOCETIRIZINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE FILM-COATED TABLETS FOR QUALITY AND EQUIVALENCE SOLD IN ADEN, YEMEN\",\"authors\":\"S. S. Al-Kubati, Olfat Saleh Ahmed, R. M. Saif\",\"doi\":\"10.47372/ejua-ba.2022.4.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Generic drugs are less expensive than innovator drugs, and their proliferation has become a problem in low-income countries. They need to be therapeutically and pharmaceutically equivalent to the innovator. Levocetirizine dihydrochloride is an effective drug for relieving the signs of chronic urticaria, perennial allergic rhinitis, and seasonal allergic rhinitis. Our investigation into this drug in private pharmacies in Aden, Yemen, revealed that it is sold under the names of 28 brands from different countries of origin. Because of this, it is difficult for medical professionals and patients who use this medication without a prescription to select a suitable, safe, and cost-effective drug product. We assessed the quality and equivalency of six different brands of levocetirizine dihydrochloride film-coated tablets and assigned codes A, B, C, D, E, and F, with Brand A serving as the reference. The UV analytical method was evaluated for quantifying the drug from the tablets. The results indicated that it was accurate and precise. The tablets were evaluated for weight variation, thickness, hardness, friability, drug content, disintegration time, and dissolution. In order to compare the drug's dissolving profiles, the difference factor (f1) and similarity factor (f2) were used. For all six brands, the physicochemical parameter results met the acceptable limits. All six brands showed evidence of dissolving within 15 minutes, with values ranging from 80.05 ±0.81 to 103.83 ±0.90 which were within the recommended value of 80% within 30 minutes for oral solid dosage forms intended for immediate release. According to the f1 and f2 results, only brands B, D, and E were comparable to brand A and could be used interchangeably. In conclusion, four of the six brands are interchangeable. For high-quality public health, a thorough analysis and ongoing monitoring are needed to ascertain the quality and equivalency of the medications marketed under various brands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of University of Aden for Basic and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of University of Aden for Basic and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47372/ejua-ba.2022.4.201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of University of Aden for Basic and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47372/ejua-ba.2022.4.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仿制药比创新药便宜,它们的扩散已经成为低收入国家的一个问题。他们需要在治疗和药物上与创新者等同。盐酸左西替利嗪是缓解慢性荨麻疹、常年性变应性鼻炎和季节性变应性鼻炎症状的有效药物。我们在也门亚丁的私人药房对这种药物进行的调查显示,它以来自不同原产国的28个品牌的名义出售。因此,医疗专业人员和无处方使用该药物的患者很难选择合适、安全且具有成本效益的药物产品。对6种不同品牌盐酸左西替利嗪薄膜包衣片的质量和等效性进行评价,编号为A、B、C、D、E、F,以A品牌为参比。对紫外分光光度法测定片剂中药物含量进行了评价。结果表明,该方法准确、精确。对片剂进行重量变化、厚度、硬度、脆性、药物含量、崩解时间、溶出度等评价。采用差异因子(f1)和相似因子(f2)对两种药物的溶出谱进行比较。6个品牌的理化参数均达到可接受限度。所有六个品牌均显示在15分钟内溶解的证据,其值范围为80.05±0.81至103.83±0.90,在30分钟内立即释放的口服固体剂型的推荐值80%内。根据f1和f2的结果,只有品牌B、D和E与品牌A具有可比性,并且可以互换使用。总之,六个品牌中有四个是可以互换的。为了实现高质量的公共卫生,需要进行彻底的分析和持续的监测,以确定以各种品牌销售的药物的质量和等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EVALUATION OF SOME BRANDS OF LEVOCETIRIZINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE FILM-COATED TABLETS FOR QUALITY AND EQUIVALENCE SOLD IN ADEN, YEMEN
Generic drugs are less expensive than innovator drugs, and their proliferation has become a problem in low-income countries. They need to be therapeutically and pharmaceutically equivalent to the innovator. Levocetirizine dihydrochloride is an effective drug for relieving the signs of chronic urticaria, perennial allergic rhinitis, and seasonal allergic rhinitis. Our investigation into this drug in private pharmacies in Aden, Yemen, revealed that it is sold under the names of 28 brands from different countries of origin. Because of this, it is difficult for medical professionals and patients who use this medication without a prescription to select a suitable, safe, and cost-effective drug product. We assessed the quality and equivalency of six different brands of levocetirizine dihydrochloride film-coated tablets and assigned codes A, B, C, D, E, and F, with Brand A serving as the reference. The UV analytical method was evaluated for quantifying the drug from the tablets. The results indicated that it was accurate and precise. The tablets were evaluated for weight variation, thickness, hardness, friability, drug content, disintegration time, and dissolution. In order to compare the drug's dissolving profiles, the difference factor (f1) and similarity factor (f2) were used. For all six brands, the physicochemical parameter results met the acceptable limits. All six brands showed evidence of dissolving within 15 minutes, with values ranging from 80.05 ±0.81 to 103.83 ±0.90 which were within the recommended value of 80% within 30 minutes for oral solid dosage forms intended for immediate release. According to the f1 and f2 results, only brands B, D, and E were comparable to brand A and could be used interchangeably. In conclusion, four of the six brands are interchangeable. For high-quality public health, a thorough analysis and ongoing monitoring are needed to ascertain the quality and equivalency of the medications marketed under various brands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信