增强商品指数的战略和战术作用

G. Rallis, J. Miffre, Ana‐Maria Fuertes
{"title":"增强商品指数的战略和战术作用","authors":"G. Rallis, J. Miffre, Ana‐Maria Fuertes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1648816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article formally compares two traditional long-only commodity indices, S&P-GSCI and DJ-UBSCI, with their enhanced versions that exploit signals based on contract maturity, momentum and term structure. The enhanced indices are found to be useful for tactical asset allocation. With alphas ranging from 2.77% to 5.49% per annum, the maturity-enhanced indices offer the best abnormal performance after accounting for liquidity risk. Momentum and term structure enhancements also earn a positive, albeit smaller, alpha of 1.97% per annum on average. All the enhanced indices are found to be as effective tools for risk diversification and inflation hedging as their traditional counterparts, making them useful for strategic asset allocation.","PeriodicalId":11485,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic and Tactical Roles of Enhanced-Commodity Indices\",\"authors\":\"G. Rallis, J. Miffre, Ana‐Maria Fuertes\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1648816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article formally compares two traditional long-only commodity indices, S&P-GSCI and DJ-UBSCI, with their enhanced versions that exploit signals based on contract maturity, momentum and term structure. The enhanced indices are found to be useful for tactical asset allocation. With alphas ranging from 2.77% to 5.49% per annum, the maturity-enhanced indices offer the best abnormal performance after accounting for liquidity risk. Momentum and term structure enhancements also earn a positive, albeit smaller, alpha of 1.97% per annum on average. All the enhanced indices are found to be as effective tools for risk diversification and inflation hedging as their traditional counterparts, making them useful for strategic asset allocation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1648816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1648816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

本文正式比较了两个传统的只做多的商品指数,标准普尔- gsci和道琼斯- ubsci,以及它们的增强版本,利用基于合约期限、动量和期限结构的信号。增强后的指数对策略性资产配置是有用的。考虑流动性风险后,期限增强指数的年均值为2.77% ~ 5.49%,异常表现最好。动量和期限结构的增强也平均每年带来1.97%的正alpha,尽管较小。研究发现,所有增强的指数与传统指数一样,都是风险分散和通胀对冲的有效工具,有助于战略资产配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic and Tactical Roles of Enhanced-Commodity Indices
This article formally compares two traditional long-only commodity indices, S&P-GSCI and DJ-UBSCI, with their enhanced versions that exploit signals based on contract maturity, momentum and term structure. The enhanced indices are found to be useful for tactical asset allocation. With alphas ranging from 2.77% to 5.49% per annum, the maturity-enhanced indices offer the best abnormal performance after accounting for liquidity risk. Momentum and term structure enhancements also earn a positive, albeit smaller, alpha of 1.97% per annum on average. All the enhanced indices are found to be as effective tools for risk diversification and inflation hedging as their traditional counterparts, making them useful for strategic asset allocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信