番石榴籽或果皮氢乙醇提取物对肉鸡生产性能和肉品质的影响

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
P. O. Nesello, C. Eyng, R. Nunes, E. Argandoña, C. Correia, J. Broch, N. Rohloff Junior, V. Savaris, E. C. dos Santos
{"title":"番石榴籽或果皮氢乙醇提取物对肉鸡生产性能和肉品质的影响","authors":"P. O. Nesello, C. Eyng, R. Nunes, E. Argandoña, C. Correia, J. Broch, N. Rohloff Junior, V. Savaris, E. C. dos Santos","doi":"10.4314/sajas.v52i5.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dietary inclusion of hydroethanolic extract of guavira seed or peel was evaluated on broiler performance, intestinal morphometry, carcass yield, and meat quality. A total of 1,680 male chicks, one day old, were distributed in a 2×5+2 factorial design (hydroethanolic extract of guavira seed (HEGS) or hydroethanolic extract of guavira peel (HEGP); 100; 200; 300; 400 and 500 mg/kg of inclusion and a positive control (PC) with antibiotics and negative control (NC) without growth promoter), with seven replicates and 20 birds each. A better feed conversion ratio (FCR) was observed from days 1–7 and days 1–21 on the PC diet than on the NC diet. FCR from 1–7d of broilers on PC was better than those on HEGS or HEGP, and this better FCR was maintained until 21 d for the HEGS treatment. The HEGP diet showed lower average feed intake and better FCR for the total period compared to NC diets. Higher carcass yield and a higher L15 value for breast meat was observed in the HEGP group compared to HEGS. Broilers fed the PC diet showed a higher a* value 15 min and 24 h postmortem, higher water retention capacity in breast meat compared to birds fed HEGS, and a higher value of a* 24 h postmortem than those receiving NC. The inclusion of 100 to 500 mg/kg of HEGP or HEGS did not improve performance, intestinal morphometry, and carcass characteristics when compared to the performance-enhancing antibiotic. However, the HEGP diet provided better performance of broilers than the non-use of growth promoter additives in the diet.","PeriodicalId":21869,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diets containing hydroethanolic extract of guavira seed or peel\",\"authors\":\"P. O. Nesello, C. Eyng, R. Nunes, E. Argandoña, C. Correia, J. Broch, N. Rohloff Junior, V. Savaris, E. C. dos Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/sajas.v52i5.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dietary inclusion of hydroethanolic extract of guavira seed or peel was evaluated on broiler performance, intestinal morphometry, carcass yield, and meat quality. A total of 1,680 male chicks, one day old, were distributed in a 2×5+2 factorial design (hydroethanolic extract of guavira seed (HEGS) or hydroethanolic extract of guavira peel (HEGP); 100; 200; 300; 400 and 500 mg/kg of inclusion and a positive control (PC) with antibiotics and negative control (NC) without growth promoter), with seven replicates and 20 birds each. A better feed conversion ratio (FCR) was observed from days 1–7 and days 1–21 on the PC diet than on the NC diet. FCR from 1–7d of broilers on PC was better than those on HEGS or HEGP, and this better FCR was maintained until 21 d for the HEGS treatment. The HEGP diet showed lower average feed intake and better FCR for the total period compared to NC diets. Higher carcass yield and a higher L15 value for breast meat was observed in the HEGP group compared to HEGS. Broilers fed the PC diet showed a higher a* value 15 min and 24 h postmortem, higher water retention capacity in breast meat compared to birds fed HEGS, and a higher value of a* 24 h postmortem than those receiving NC. The inclusion of 100 to 500 mg/kg of HEGP or HEGS did not improve performance, intestinal morphometry, and carcass characteristics when compared to the performance-enhancing antibiotic. However, the HEGP diet provided better performance of broilers than the non-use of growth promoter additives in the diet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v52i5.14\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v52i5.14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了番石榴籽或果皮氢乙醇提取物对肉鸡生产性能、肠道形态、胴体产量和肉品质的影响。1日龄雄性雏鸡1680只,采用2×5+2因子设计(石榴籽氢乙醇提取物(HEGS)或石榴皮氢乙醇提取物(HEGP))进行试验;100;200;300;添加抗生素的阳性对照(PC)和不添加生长促进剂的阴性对照(NC),共7个重复,每个重复20只鸡。试验第1 ~ 7天和第1 ~ 21天,PC饲粮的饲料系数(FCR)均优于NC饲粮。PC组肉鸡1 ~ 7d的饲料效率优于HEGS组和HEGP组,且这种良好的饲料效率在HEGS处理后一直保持到21 d。与NC饲粮相比,HEGP饲粮的平均采食量较低,全期饲料转化率较高。与HEGS相比,HEGP组胴体产量更高,胸肉L15值更高。PC组肉鸡在死后15 min和24 h的a*值高于HEGS组,胸肉的保水性也高于NC组。与性能增强抗生素相比,添加100 ~ 500 mg/kg的HEGP或HEGS并未改善猪的生产性能、肠道形态和胴体特征。然而,与不添加生长促进剂添加剂相比,添加HEGP饲粮的肉鸡生产性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diets containing hydroethanolic extract of guavira seed or peel
The dietary inclusion of hydroethanolic extract of guavira seed or peel was evaluated on broiler performance, intestinal morphometry, carcass yield, and meat quality. A total of 1,680 male chicks, one day old, were distributed in a 2×5+2 factorial design (hydroethanolic extract of guavira seed (HEGS) or hydroethanolic extract of guavira peel (HEGP); 100; 200; 300; 400 and 500 mg/kg of inclusion and a positive control (PC) with antibiotics and negative control (NC) without growth promoter), with seven replicates and 20 birds each. A better feed conversion ratio (FCR) was observed from days 1–7 and days 1–21 on the PC diet than on the NC diet. FCR from 1–7d of broilers on PC was better than those on HEGS or HEGP, and this better FCR was maintained until 21 d for the HEGS treatment. The HEGP diet showed lower average feed intake and better FCR for the total period compared to NC diets. Higher carcass yield and a higher L15 value for breast meat was observed in the HEGP group compared to HEGS. Broilers fed the PC diet showed a higher a* value 15 min and 24 h postmortem, higher water retention capacity in breast meat compared to birds fed HEGS, and a higher value of a* 24 h postmortem than those receiving NC. The inclusion of 100 to 500 mg/kg of HEGP or HEGS did not improve performance, intestinal morphometry, and carcass characteristics when compared to the performance-enhancing antibiotic. However, the HEGP diet provided better performance of broilers than the non-use of growth promoter additives in the diet.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Animal Science
South African Journal of Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Animal Science is an open access, peer-reviewed journal for publication of original scientific articles and reviews in the field of animal science. The journal publishes reports of research dealing with production of farmed animal species (cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, poultry and ostriches), as well as pertinent aspects of research on aquatic and wildlife species. Disciplines covered nutrition, genetics, physiology, and production systems. Systematic research on animal products, behaviour, and welfare are also invited. Rigorous testing of well-specified hypotheses is expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信