{"title":"女性患者对处女膜修复和贞洁证书价值的评估是否有问题?医师态度的实证研究","authors":"Niklas Juth, Niels Lynöe","doi":"10.1016/j.woman.2014.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of the present study was to examine whether physicians’ estimations of medical needs are influenced by the physicians’ own personal values.</p></div><div><h3>Design and method</h3><p>We used a vignette where a young female requests hymen restoration or virginity certificate due to honour-related threats. We asked whether or not the participating physicians would under certain circumstances be prepared to help the young females. We also asked what would happen to their own trust and what they estimated would happen to the general public's trust in healthcare if performing such operations or writing such certificates was generally accepted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of those whose own trust would not be influenced [59.7% (95% CI 55.2–64.2)] were found among the respondents who stated that they were prepared to help the young females, as against those [13.5% (95% CI 10–16.5)] stating that they would help under no circumstances. We found an association between those whose own trust would decrease and those stating that they would help under no circumstances [OR 90 (95% CI 12.2–664.3)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results indicate that factual aspects are influenced by physicians’ own values. If factual aspects such as estimation of the patient's trustworthiness and medical needs are impregnated by physicians’ personal values, there is a risk of arbitrariness when deciding whether to help young females in distress. In order to avoid arbitrariness in decision-making we suggest that consensus in the area is developed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101282,"journal":{"name":"Woman - Psychosomatic Gynaecology and Obstetrics","volume":"1 ","pages":"Pages 24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.woman.2014.10.001","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are estimations of female patients’ need of hymen restoration and virginity certificate value-impregnated? Empirical study of physicians’ attitudes\",\"authors\":\"Niklas Juth, Niels Lynöe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.woman.2014.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of the present study was to examine whether physicians’ estimations of medical needs are influenced by the physicians’ own personal values.</p></div><div><h3>Design and method</h3><p>We used a vignette where a young female requests hymen restoration or virginity certificate due to honour-related threats. We asked whether or not the participating physicians would under certain circumstances be prepared to help the young females. We also asked what would happen to their own trust and what they estimated would happen to the general public's trust in healthcare if performing such operations or writing such certificates was generally accepted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of those whose own trust would not be influenced [59.7% (95% CI 55.2–64.2)] were found among the respondents who stated that they were prepared to help the young females, as against those [13.5% (95% CI 10–16.5)] stating that they would help under no circumstances. We found an association between those whose own trust would decrease and those stating that they would help under no circumstances [OR 90 (95% CI 12.2–664.3)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results indicate that factual aspects are influenced by physicians’ own values. If factual aspects such as estimation of the patient's trustworthiness and medical needs are impregnated by physicians’ personal values, there is a risk of arbitrariness when deciding whether to help young females in distress. In order to avoid arbitrariness in decision-making we suggest that consensus in the area is developed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Woman - Psychosomatic Gynaecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 24-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.woman.2014.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Woman - Psychosomatic Gynaecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213560X14000046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Woman - Psychosomatic Gynaecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213560X14000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
目的本研究旨在探讨医师对医疗需求的估计是否受到医师个人价值观的影响。设计和方法我们使用了一个小插图,其中一个年轻的女性由于荣誉相关的威胁而要求处女膜修复或处女证书。我们询问参与的医生在某些情况下是否愿意帮助年轻女性。我们还询问了他们自己的信任会发生什么变化,以及他们估计如果进行此类手术或编写此类证书被普遍接受,公众对医疗保健的信任会发生什么变化。结果大多数受访者表示自己的信任不会受到影响[59.7% (95% CI 55.2-64.2)],而大多数受访者(13.5% (95% CI 10-16.5))表示在任何情况下都不会帮助年轻女性。我们发现那些自己的信任会下降的人与那些声称在任何情况下都不会帮助的人之间存在关联[OR 90 (95% CI 12.2-664.3)]。结论事实方面受到医师自身价值观的影响。如果对病人的可信度和医疗需求的评估等事实方面受到医生个人价值观的影响,那么在决定是否帮助处于困境中的年轻女性时,就有随意性的风险。为了避免决策中的随意性,我们建议在这方面形成共识。
Are estimations of female patients’ need of hymen restoration and virginity certificate value-impregnated? Empirical study of physicians’ attitudes
Aim
The aim of the present study was to examine whether physicians’ estimations of medical needs are influenced by the physicians’ own personal values.
Design and method
We used a vignette where a young female requests hymen restoration or virginity certificate due to honour-related threats. We asked whether or not the participating physicians would under certain circumstances be prepared to help the young females. We also asked what would happen to their own trust and what they estimated would happen to the general public's trust in healthcare if performing such operations or writing such certificates was generally accepted.
Results
The majority of those whose own trust would not be influenced [59.7% (95% CI 55.2–64.2)] were found among the respondents who stated that they were prepared to help the young females, as against those [13.5% (95% CI 10–16.5)] stating that they would help under no circumstances. We found an association between those whose own trust would decrease and those stating that they would help under no circumstances [OR 90 (95% CI 12.2–664.3)].
Conclusion
The results indicate that factual aspects are influenced by physicians’ own values. If factual aspects such as estimation of the patient's trustworthiness and medical needs are impregnated by physicians’ personal values, there is a risk of arbitrariness when deciding whether to help young females in distress. In order to avoid arbitrariness in decision-making we suggest that consensus in the area is developed.