制定目标指标体系,对俄罗斯联邦各地区向糖尿病患者提供医疗服务的组织效率进行评级和综合评价

I. Mikhailov, V. V. Omelyanovsky, M. Shestakova, N. Mokrysheva
{"title":"制定目标指标体系,对俄罗斯联邦各地区向糖尿病患者提供医疗服务的组织效率进行评级和综合评价","authors":"I. Mikhailov, V. V. Omelyanovsky, M. Shestakova, N. Mokrysheva","doi":"10.14341/dm12925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: Formation of a system of target indicators for rating and integral assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus in the Russian Federation regions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was an expert survey in the form of a structured interview. At the first stage, we performed the primary selection of indicators. At the second stage, the selection of experts took place in accordance with the inclusion criteria, and the assessment of the level of expert competence was assessed based on a self-assessment survey. Further, criteria we formulated for expert evaluation of the significance of the selected indicators in accordance with the principles used in the development of national and federal projects. The indicators were divided into two groups: additional (process) and main (outcome). To quantify the degree of agreement between the experts’ answers, Kendall’s concordance coefficient (W) was calculated. The significance of differences was assessed using the nonparametric Friedman test.RESULTS: Only indicators with a high degree of agreement between experts and the presence of statistical significance in terms of the concordance coefficient are recommended as target indicators. The following main and additional indicators satisfy these requirements: mortality from cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes (people per 100,000 population); the proportion of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus provided with medical devices out of the total number of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (percentage); the proportion of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus with high amputations of all patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus with any amputations (percentage); and other indicators.CONCLUSION: We selected indicators that can be used both for the integral rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, and in the formation of federal projects or departmental target programs. The results of the study can also be used to organize a system for monitoring the effectiveness of the implementation of these projects and programs.","PeriodicalId":73708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of diabetes mellitus","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formation of a system of target indicators for rating and integral evaluation of the efficiency of the organization of the provision of medical care to patients with diabetes mellitus in the Russian Federation regions\",\"authors\":\"I. Mikhailov, V. V. Omelyanovsky, M. Shestakova, N. Mokrysheva\",\"doi\":\"10.14341/dm12925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM: Formation of a system of target indicators for rating and integral assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus in the Russian Federation regions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was an expert survey in the form of a structured interview. At the first stage, we performed the primary selection of indicators. At the second stage, the selection of experts took place in accordance with the inclusion criteria, and the assessment of the level of expert competence was assessed based on a self-assessment survey. Further, criteria we formulated for expert evaluation of the significance of the selected indicators in accordance with the principles used in the development of national and federal projects. The indicators were divided into two groups: additional (process) and main (outcome). To quantify the degree of agreement between the experts’ answers, Kendall’s concordance coefficient (W) was calculated. The significance of differences was assessed using the nonparametric Friedman test.RESULTS: Only indicators with a high degree of agreement between experts and the presence of statistical significance in terms of the concordance coefficient are recommended as target indicators. The following main and additional indicators satisfy these requirements: mortality from cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes (people per 100,000 population); the proportion of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus provided with medical devices out of the total number of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (percentage); the proportion of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus with high amputations of all patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus with any amputations (percentage); and other indicators.CONCLUSION: We selected indicators that can be used both for the integral rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, and in the formation of federal projects or departmental target programs. The results of the study can also be used to organize a system for monitoring the effectiveness of the implementation of these projects and programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of diabetes mellitus\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of diabetes mellitus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14341/dm12925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of diabetes mellitus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14341/dm12925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:形成目标指标体系,对俄罗斯联邦地区糖尿病患者医疗保健组织的有效性和效率进行评级和综合评估。材料与方法:本研究采用结构化访谈形式的专家调查。在第一阶段,我们进行了指标的初步选择。在第二阶段,根据入选标准进行专家的选拔,并根据自评调查对专家能力水平进行评估。此外,我们根据国家和联邦项目开发中使用的原则制定了专家评估选定指标重要性的标准。指标分为两组:附加(过程)和主要(结果)。为了量化专家答案之间的一致程度,计算了肯德尔一致性系数(W)。采用非参数Friedman检验评估差异的显著性。结果:只有专家之间高度一致且一致性系数具有统计显著性的指标才被推荐为目标指标。下列主要和附加指标满足这些要求:2型糖尿病心血管并发症死亡率(每10万人);1型和2型糖尿病患者获得医疗器械的比例占1型和2型糖尿病患者总数的比例(百分比);1、2型糖尿病患者高度截肢占所有截肢1、2型糖尿病患者的比例(百分比);还有其他指标。结论:我们选择的指标既可以用于俄罗斯联邦组成实体的整体评级,也可以用于制定联邦项目或部门目标计划。这项研究的结果也可以用来组织一个系统来监测这些项目和方案的执行效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formation of a system of target indicators for rating and integral evaluation of the efficiency of the organization of the provision of medical care to patients with diabetes mellitus in the Russian Federation regions
AIM: Formation of a system of target indicators for rating and integral assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus in the Russian Federation regions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was an expert survey in the form of a structured interview. At the first stage, we performed the primary selection of indicators. At the second stage, the selection of experts took place in accordance with the inclusion criteria, and the assessment of the level of expert competence was assessed based on a self-assessment survey. Further, criteria we formulated for expert evaluation of the significance of the selected indicators in accordance with the principles used in the development of national and federal projects. The indicators were divided into two groups: additional (process) and main (outcome). To quantify the degree of agreement between the experts’ answers, Kendall’s concordance coefficient (W) was calculated. The significance of differences was assessed using the nonparametric Friedman test.RESULTS: Only indicators with a high degree of agreement between experts and the presence of statistical significance in terms of the concordance coefficient are recommended as target indicators. The following main and additional indicators satisfy these requirements: mortality from cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes (people per 100,000 population); the proportion of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus provided with medical devices out of the total number of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (percentage); the proportion of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus with high amputations of all patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus with any amputations (percentage); and other indicators.CONCLUSION: We selected indicators that can be used both for the integral rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, and in the formation of federal projects or departmental target programs. The results of the study can also be used to organize a system for monitoring the effectiveness of the implementation of these projects and programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信