额外护理住房:探索动机,期望和看法

IF 0.6 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Michael Buckland, A. Tinker
{"title":"额外护理住房:探索动机,期望和看法","authors":"Michael Buckland, A. Tinker","doi":"10.1108/hcs-02-2019-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to explore and compare the motivations and expectations that older people have when choosing to move into either a private or housing association (HA) extra care housing (ECH) scheme, and any effects this had on its residents.,This qualitative study is based on findings from four HA schemes in Tower Hamlets, London, and one private scheme in Warwickshire. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with five women and three men of varying backgrounds, from schemes managed by different associations and companies. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed thematically.,All residents moved into ECH in response to deteriorating health. However, almost all residents had felt obliged to move by others, generally their children. Few residents had any expectations of ECH on arrival, but many developed high expectations of an increased sense of independence and security and of an improved social life. ECH appeared to be beneficial for residents’ health and well-being.,The inability to recruit an equal number of people from HA and private scheme, alongside the small sample size, may compromise the external validity of any conclusions drawn from any comparisons.,This research identifies a lack of knowledge about ECH among the general population and offers insight into areas of poor management within ECH schemes which could be improved.,Inadequacies in the ECH model could be attributed to failures in the current health and social care system. Differences between expectations and perceptions of HA vs private schemes should be acknowledged and responded to.,This is a rare example of research exploring the relationships between ECH residents’ motivations and expectations (Hillcoat-Nalletamby and Sardani, 2019), and between those in HA vs private schemes.","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"38 1","pages":"15-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extra care housing: exploring motivations, expectations and perceptions\",\"authors\":\"Michael Buckland, A. Tinker\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/hcs-02-2019-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to explore and compare the motivations and expectations that older people have when choosing to move into either a private or housing association (HA) extra care housing (ECH) scheme, and any effects this had on its residents.,This qualitative study is based on findings from four HA schemes in Tower Hamlets, London, and one private scheme in Warwickshire. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with five women and three men of varying backgrounds, from schemes managed by different associations and companies. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed thematically.,All residents moved into ECH in response to deteriorating health. However, almost all residents had felt obliged to move by others, generally their children. Few residents had any expectations of ECH on arrival, but many developed high expectations of an increased sense of independence and security and of an improved social life. ECH appeared to be beneficial for residents’ health and well-being.,The inability to recruit an equal number of people from HA and private scheme, alongside the small sample size, may compromise the external validity of any conclusions drawn from any comparisons.,This research identifies a lack of knowledge about ECH among the general population and offers insight into areas of poor management within ECH schemes which could be improved.,Inadequacies in the ECH model could be attributed to failures in the current health and social care system. Differences between expectations and perceptions of HA vs private schemes should be acknowledged and responded to.,This is a rare example of research exploring the relationships between ECH residents’ motivations and expectations (Hillcoat-Nalletamby and Sardani, 2019), and between those in HA vs private schemes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"15-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-02-2019-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-02-2019-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是探讨和比较老年人在选择入住私人或房屋协会(HA)额外照顾房屋(ECH)计划时的动机和期望,以及这对其居民的任何影响。这项定性研究是基于伦敦陶尔哈姆茨的四个HA计划和沃里克郡的一个私人计划的调查结果。研究人员对来自不同协会和公司管理的项目的5名女性和3名男性进行了8次半结构化访谈。访谈记录按主题进行编码和分析。由于健康状况恶化,所有居民都搬进了ECH。然而,几乎所有的居民都觉得是别人,通常是他们的孩子,迫使他们搬家的。很少有居民在抵达时对ECH有任何期望,但许多人对增加的独立感和安全感以及改善的社会生活产生了很高的期望。ECH似乎对居民的健康和福祉有益。由于无法从医管局和私营医疗机构招募同等数量的人员,加上样本规模小,可能会影响任何比较所得结论的外在有效性。本研究确定了普通人群缺乏对ECH的了解,并对ECH计划中管理不善的领域提供了见解,这些领域可以改进。欧洲经委会模式的不足可归因于当前卫生和社会保健系统的失败。对医管局与私营计划的期望和看法,应予以承认和回应。这是一个罕见的研究例子,探讨了ECH居民的动机和期望之间的关系(Hillcoat-Nalletamby和Sardani, 2019),以及HA与私人计划之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extra care housing: exploring motivations, expectations and perceptions
The purpose of this paper is to explore and compare the motivations and expectations that older people have when choosing to move into either a private or housing association (HA) extra care housing (ECH) scheme, and any effects this had on its residents.,This qualitative study is based on findings from four HA schemes in Tower Hamlets, London, and one private scheme in Warwickshire. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with five women and three men of varying backgrounds, from schemes managed by different associations and companies. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed thematically.,All residents moved into ECH in response to deteriorating health. However, almost all residents had felt obliged to move by others, generally their children. Few residents had any expectations of ECH on arrival, but many developed high expectations of an increased sense of independence and security and of an improved social life. ECH appeared to be beneficial for residents’ health and well-being.,The inability to recruit an equal number of people from HA and private scheme, alongside the small sample size, may compromise the external validity of any conclusions drawn from any comparisons.,This research identifies a lack of knowledge about ECH among the general population and offers insight into areas of poor management within ECH schemes which could be improved.,Inadequacies in the ECH model could be attributed to failures in the current health and social care system. Differences between expectations and perceptions of HA vs private schemes should be acknowledged and responded to.,This is a rare example of research exploring the relationships between ECH residents’ motivations and expectations (Hillcoat-Nalletamby and Sardani, 2019), and between those in HA vs private schemes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信