食品公正的实践:美国东部食品中心如何协商种族和地点

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Dr. Karen E. Rignall, Dr. Keiko Tanaka, Margarita Velandia, Carlos Trejo-Pech, Alessandra Del Brocco, Nathaniel Messer, Teya Cuellar
{"title":"食品公正的实践:美国东部食品中心如何协商种族和地点","authors":"Dr. Karen E. Rignall,&nbsp;Dr. Keiko Tanaka,&nbsp;Margarita Velandia,&nbsp;Carlos Trejo-Pech,&nbsp;Alessandra Del Brocco,&nbsp;Nathaniel Messer,&nbsp;Teya Cuellar","doi":"10.1111/cuag.12302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite aspirations toward more equitable and sustainable food systems, alternative food movements have been critiqued for reproducing the inequalities of the agrifood system they contest. This article examines the challenges a group of justice-oriented food hubs face in integrating racial justice into their work. We ask whether the financial pressures of enacting alternative approaches to food hub work within market logics can squeeze out racial justice goals. We find that dominant framings of alternative food movements diminish Black activism. We argue that justice-oriented food hubs can get caught in a “justice trap” similar to the “local trap”—the tendency to assume that the local scale is inherently desirable and leads to a socially just food system. The notion of a justice trap signals the assumption that what constitutes justice in the food system is self-evident and that different forms of justice are automatically subsumed within the general concept of “food justice.” Our analysis indicates that the justice trap arises from an inability to articulate the racial justice implications of the everyday realities of running organizations within the market logics that dominate even alternative food movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":54150,"journal":{"name":"Culture Agriculture Food and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Practice of Food Justice: How Food Hubs Negotiate Race and Place in the Eastern United States\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Karen E. Rignall,&nbsp;Dr. Keiko Tanaka,&nbsp;Margarita Velandia,&nbsp;Carlos Trejo-Pech,&nbsp;Alessandra Del Brocco,&nbsp;Nathaniel Messer,&nbsp;Teya Cuellar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cuag.12302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite aspirations toward more equitable and sustainable food systems, alternative food movements have been critiqued for reproducing the inequalities of the agrifood system they contest. This article examines the challenges a group of justice-oriented food hubs face in integrating racial justice into their work. We ask whether the financial pressures of enacting alternative approaches to food hub work within market logics can squeeze out racial justice goals. We find that dominant framings of alternative food movements diminish Black activism. We argue that justice-oriented food hubs can get caught in a “justice trap” similar to the “local trap”—the tendency to assume that the local scale is inherently desirable and leads to a socially just food system. The notion of a justice trap signals the assumption that what constitutes justice in the food system is self-evident and that different forms of justice are automatically subsumed within the general concept of “food justice.” Our analysis indicates that the justice trap arises from an inability to articulate the racial justice implications of the everyday realities of running organizations within the market logics that dominate even alternative food movements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture Agriculture Food and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture Agriculture Food and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cuag.12302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Agriculture Food and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cuag.12302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们渴望建立更加公平和可持续的粮食系统,但替代粮食运动因再现了他们所反对的农业粮食系统的不平等而受到批评。本文考察了一组以正义为导向的食品中心在将种族正义纳入其工作中所面临的挑战。我们要问的是,在市场逻辑下,制定替代食品中心工作方法的财政压力是否会挤出种族正义的目标。我们发现替代食物运动的主流框架削弱了黑人的行动主义。我们认为,以正义为导向的食品中心可能会陷入类似于“地方陷阱”的“正义陷阱”——倾向于假设地方规模本质上是可取的,并导致社会公正的食品系统。“正义陷阱”的概念表明,在粮食系统中构成正义的因素是不言而喻的,不同形式的正义被自动纳入“粮食正义”的一般概念。我们的分析表明,正义陷阱源于无法阐明在市场逻辑中主导甚至替代食品运动的组织运营的日常现实中的种族正义含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Practice of Food Justice: How Food Hubs Negotiate Race and Place in the Eastern United States

Despite aspirations toward more equitable and sustainable food systems, alternative food movements have been critiqued for reproducing the inequalities of the agrifood system they contest. This article examines the challenges a group of justice-oriented food hubs face in integrating racial justice into their work. We ask whether the financial pressures of enacting alternative approaches to food hub work within market logics can squeeze out racial justice goals. We find that dominant framings of alternative food movements diminish Black activism. We argue that justice-oriented food hubs can get caught in a “justice trap” similar to the “local trap”—the tendency to assume that the local scale is inherently desirable and leads to a socially just food system. The notion of a justice trap signals the assumption that what constitutes justice in the food system is self-evident and that different forms of justice are automatically subsumed within the general concept of “food justice.” Our analysis indicates that the justice trap arises from an inability to articulate the racial justice implications of the everyday realities of running organizations within the market logics that dominate even alternative food movements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Culture Agriculture Food and Environment
Culture Agriculture Food and Environment AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信