Regional Tectonics to Basin Fill Architecture from Aptian Shuaiba Fm to Miocene Fars Gp of Abu Dhabi

Aptian (Shuaiba-Bab) and Cenomanian (Mishrif-Shilaif) intra-shelf basins were extensively studied with their genesis focused on environmental/climatic disturbances (Vahrenkamp et al., 2015a). Additionally, local tectonic events can also affect the physiography of these basins, especially the Cenomanian intra-shelf basin subjected to NE compressional regime. As this ongoing regime increased at Late-Cretaceous and Miocene, it led to more tectonic-driven basin physiography. This paper investigates the areal extent, interaction, and commonalities between the extensional Aptian intra-shelf basin, compressional Late-Cretaceous intra-shelf basin, Late-Cretaceous-Paleogene foreland basin, and Late Oligocene-Miocene salt basin. To understand the genesis, driving forces, and distribution of these basins, we used a combination of several large-scale stratigraphic well correlations and seismic, together with age dating, cores, and extensive well information (ADNOC proprietary internal reports). The methodology used this data for detailed mapping of 11 relevant time stratigraphic intervals, placing the mapped architecture in the context of the global eustatic sea level and major geodynamic events of the Arabian Plate. Aptian basin took place as a consequence of environmental/climatic disturbances (Vahrenkamp et al., 2015a). However, environmental factors alone cannot explain isolated carbonate build-ups on salt-related structures at the intra-shelf basin, offshore Abu Dhabi. Subsequently, the emplacement of thrust sheets of Tethyan rocks from NE, and following ophiolite obduction (Searle et al., 1990; Searle, 2007; Searle and Ali, 2009; Searle et al., 2014), established a compressional regime in the Albian?-Cenomanian. This induced tectonic features such as: loading-erosion on eastern Abu Dhabi, isolated carbonate build-ups, and reactivation of a N-S deep-rooted fault (possibly a continuation of Precambrian Amad basement ridge from KSA). This N-S feature was probably the main factor contributing the basin axis change from E-W Aptian trend to N-S position at Cenomanian. Further compression continued into the Coniacian-Santonian, leading to a nascent foreland basin. This compression established a foredeep in eastern Abu Dhabi, separated by a bulge from the northern extension of the eastern Rub’ Al-Khali basin (Ghurab syncline) (Patton and O'Connor, 1988). Numerous paleostructures were developed onshore Abu Dhabi, together with several small patch-reefs on offshore salt growing structures. Campanian exhibits maximum structuration associated to eastern transpression related to Masirah ophiolite obduction during India drift (Johnson et al., 2005, Filbrandt et al., 2006; Gaina et al., 2015). This caused more differentiation of the foredeep, onshore synclines, and northern paleostructures, which continued to cease through Maastrichtian. From Paleocene to Late-Eocene, paleostructure growth intensity continued decreasing and foreland basin hydrological restriction began with the Neotethys closure. Through Oligocene until Burdigalian this situation continued, where the Neotethys closed with the Zagros Orogeny (Sharland et al., 2001), causing a new environmental/climatic disturbances period. These disturbances prevented the continued progradation of the carbonate factory into the foredeep, leading to conspicuous platform-basin differentiation. Additionally, the Zagros orogeny tilted the plate northeastward, dismantling the paleostructures generated at Late-Cenomanian. Finally, during an arid climate in the Burdigalian to Middle-Miocene, the confined Neogene sea filled the foredeep accommodation space with massive evaporites. Little has been published about the outline and architecture of these basins in Abu Dhabi and the detailed circumstances that led to their genesis using subsurface information.