K. Jarrahian, K. Sorbie, Michael A. Singleton, L. Boak, A. Graham
{"title":"建立对碳酸盐地层阻垢剂滞留的基本认识","authors":"K. Jarrahian, K. Sorbie, Michael A. Singleton, L. Boak, A. Graham","doi":"10.2118/193635-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Scale inhibitor (SI) squeeze treatments in carbonate reservoirs are often affected by the chemical reactivity between the SI and the carbonate mineral substrate. This chemical interaction may lead to a controlled precipitation of the SI through the formation of a sparingly soluble Ca/SI complex which can lead to an extended squeeze lifetime. However, the same interaction may in some cases lead to uncontrolled SI precipitation causing near-well formation damage in the treated zone. This paper presents a detailed study of the various retention mechanisms of SI in carbonate formations, considering system variables such as the (carbonate) formation mineralogy, the type of SI and the system conditions. Apparent adsorption (Γapp) experiments, described previously (Kahrwad et al. 2008), are used to show when the SI/substrate interaction is pure adsorption (Γ) or coupled adsorption (Γ)/precipitation (∏). Experiments were performed for different SIs at various operational conditions, i.e. initial pH values, minerologies - calcite, limestone and dolomite - and temperatures; the overall results from these coupled Γ/∏ experiments are summarised in Table 3. The SI species used in this study included 1 phosphonate (DETPMP), 1 phosphate ester (PAPE) and 3 polymeric scale inhibitors (PPCA, PFC, VS-Co); the full names of these SIs are given in the paper. All precipitates were studied using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-Ray (ESEM/EDX) and Particle Size Analysis (PSA). These measurements confirmed that when precipitation occurred, it was mainly in the bulk solution and not on the rock surface.\n For all SIs, both adsorption (Γ) and precipitation (∏) retention mechanisms were observed, with the dominant mechanism depending on SI chemistry, temperature and mineralogy. Differences were observed between the \"apparent adsorption\" (Γapp) levels of polymeric, phosphonate and phosphate ester scale inhibitors, as follows: For the polymeric SIs (PPCA, PFC and VS-Co), the highest retention levels were observed at low pH for all carbonate substrates, due to the increase in divalent cations (Ca2+ and Mg2+) available from rock dissolution for SI-M2+ precipitation. For phosphonate (DETPMP) and phosphate ester (PAPE) SIs, the retention level was greatest at higher pH values, as the SI functional groups were more dissociated and hence available for complexation with M2+ ions.The polymeric VS-Co showed the lowest amount of precipitation (Γapp ~ 1.2 mg/g) in contact with dolomite substrate due to the presence of sulphonate groups (low pKa); indeed this showed low Γapp which was predominantly pure adsorption. However, a small amount of precipitate was observed by ESEM/EDX and PSA.For polymeric inhibitors, the retention level (Γapp) was highest on calcite (highest relative calcium content), followed by limestone and then dolomite. Phosphonate and phosphate ester SIs showed the highest retention levels on dolomite (higher final solution pH and more SI dissociated), followed by limestone and calcite.For all SI species, higher retention (more precipitation, ∏) was observed at elevated temperature. At lower temperatures, a more extended region of pure adsorption was observed for all SIs.\n The information presented in this study will help us in SI product selection for application of squeeze treatments with longer squeeze lifetimes in carbonate reservoir based on mineralogy and reservoir conditions. In addition, this study provides valuable data for validating models of the SI/Carbonate/Ca/Mg system which can be incorporated in squeeze design simulations.","PeriodicalId":10983,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building a Fundamental Understanding of Scale Inhibitor Retention in Carbonate Formations\",\"authors\":\"K. Jarrahian, K. Sorbie, Michael A. Singleton, L. Boak, A. Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/193635-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Scale inhibitor (SI) squeeze treatments in carbonate reservoirs are often affected by the chemical reactivity between the SI and the carbonate mineral substrate. This chemical interaction may lead to a controlled precipitation of the SI through the formation of a sparingly soluble Ca/SI complex which can lead to an extended squeeze lifetime. However, the same interaction may in some cases lead to uncontrolled SI precipitation causing near-well formation damage in the treated zone. This paper presents a detailed study of the various retention mechanisms of SI in carbonate formations, considering system variables such as the (carbonate) formation mineralogy, the type of SI and the system conditions. Apparent adsorption (Γapp) experiments, described previously (Kahrwad et al. 2008), are used to show when the SI/substrate interaction is pure adsorption (Γ) or coupled adsorption (Γ)/precipitation (∏). Experiments were performed for different SIs at various operational conditions, i.e. initial pH values, minerologies - calcite, limestone and dolomite - and temperatures; the overall results from these coupled Γ/∏ experiments are summarised in Table 3. The SI species used in this study included 1 phosphonate (DETPMP), 1 phosphate ester (PAPE) and 3 polymeric scale inhibitors (PPCA, PFC, VS-Co); the full names of these SIs are given in the paper. All precipitates were studied using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-Ray (ESEM/EDX) and Particle Size Analysis (PSA). These measurements confirmed that when precipitation occurred, it was mainly in the bulk solution and not on the rock surface.\\n For all SIs, both adsorption (Γ) and precipitation (∏) retention mechanisms were observed, with the dominant mechanism depending on SI chemistry, temperature and mineralogy. Differences were observed between the \\\"apparent adsorption\\\" (Γapp) levels of polymeric, phosphonate and phosphate ester scale inhibitors, as follows: For the polymeric SIs (PPCA, PFC and VS-Co), the highest retention levels were observed at low pH for all carbonate substrates, due to the increase in divalent cations (Ca2+ and Mg2+) available from rock dissolution for SI-M2+ precipitation. For phosphonate (DETPMP) and phosphate ester (PAPE) SIs, the retention level was greatest at higher pH values, as the SI functional groups were more dissociated and hence available for complexation with M2+ ions.The polymeric VS-Co showed the lowest amount of precipitation (Γapp ~ 1.2 mg/g) in contact with dolomite substrate due to the presence of sulphonate groups (low pKa); indeed this showed low Γapp which was predominantly pure adsorption. However, a small amount of precipitate was observed by ESEM/EDX and PSA.For polymeric inhibitors, the retention level (Γapp) was highest on calcite (highest relative calcium content), followed by limestone and then dolomite. Phosphonate and phosphate ester SIs showed the highest retention levels on dolomite (higher final solution pH and more SI dissociated), followed by limestone and calcite.For all SI species, higher retention (more precipitation, ∏) was observed at elevated temperature. At lower temperatures, a more extended region of pure adsorption was observed for all SIs.\\n The information presented in this study will help us in SI product selection for application of squeeze treatments with longer squeeze lifetimes in carbonate reservoir based on mineralogy and reservoir conditions. In addition, this study provides valuable data for validating models of the SI/Carbonate/Ca/Mg system which can be incorporated in squeeze design simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/193635-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193635-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
碳酸盐储层中的阻垢剂(SI)挤压处理通常受到SI与碳酸盐矿物基质之间化学反应性的影响。这种化学相互作用可以通过形成少溶的Ca/SI络合物导致SI的可控沉淀,从而延长挤压寿命。然而,在某些情况下,同样的相互作用可能导致不受控制的SI降水,导致处理区域的近井地层受损。本文详细研究了碳酸盐地层中SI的各种保留机制,并考虑了诸如(碳酸盐)地层矿物学、SI类型和系统条件等系统变量。先前描述的表观吸附(Γapp)实验(Kahrwad et al. 2008)用于显示SI/底物相互作用是纯吸附(Γ)还是耦合吸附(Γ)/沉淀(∏)。实验在不同的操作条件下进行,即初始pH值,矿物学-方解石,石灰石和白云石-和温度;这些耦合Γ/∏实验的总体结果总结在表3中。本研究使用的阻垢剂包括1种磷酸盐(DETPMP)、1种磷酸酯(PAPE)和3种聚合物阻垢剂(PPCA、PFC、VS-Co);文中给出了这些si的全名。采用环境扫描电镜/能量色散x射线(ESEM/EDX)和粒度分析(PSA)对所有沉淀物进行了研究。这些测量证实,当降水发生时,它主要是在整体溶液中,而不是在岩石表面。对于所有SI,都观察到吸附(Γ)和沉淀(∏)保留机制,主要机制取决于SI化学,温度和矿物学。在聚合物、膦酸盐和磷酸酯阻垢剂的“表观吸附”(Γapp)水平之间观察到的差异如下:对于聚合物SIs (PPCA、PFC和VS-Co),在低pH下,所有碳酸盐基质的保留水平最高,这是由于岩石溶解中可用于SI-M2+沉淀的二价阳离子(Ca2+和Mg2+)的增加。对于磷酸盐(DETPMP)和磷酸酯(PAPE) SI,在较高的pH值下保留水平最大,因为SI官能团更容易解离,因此可与M2+离子络合。聚合物VS-Co由于存在低pKa的磺酸基,与白云石基质接触时析出量最低(Γapp ~ 1.2 mg/g);确实,这表明Γapp低,主要是纯吸附。但ESEM/EDX和PSA均观察到少量析出物。对于聚合物抑制剂,方解石(相对钙含量最高)的保留水平最高(Γapp),其次是石灰石,然后是白云石。磷酸盐和磷酸酯SI在白云石上的保留率最高(最终溶液pH值较高,SI解离率较高),其次是石灰石和方解石。对于所有SI物种,在高温下观察到更高的保留率(更多的降水,∏)。在较低的温度下,观察到所有si的纯吸附区域更大。本研究提供的信息将有助于我们根据矿物学和储层条件选择具有较长挤压寿命的碳酸盐储层挤压处理的SI产品。此外,该研究为验证SI/碳酸盐/Ca/Mg体系模型提供了有价值的数据,这些模型可用于挤压设计模拟。
Building a Fundamental Understanding of Scale Inhibitor Retention in Carbonate Formations
Scale inhibitor (SI) squeeze treatments in carbonate reservoirs are often affected by the chemical reactivity between the SI and the carbonate mineral substrate. This chemical interaction may lead to a controlled precipitation of the SI through the formation of a sparingly soluble Ca/SI complex which can lead to an extended squeeze lifetime. However, the same interaction may in some cases lead to uncontrolled SI precipitation causing near-well formation damage in the treated zone. This paper presents a detailed study of the various retention mechanisms of SI in carbonate formations, considering system variables such as the (carbonate) formation mineralogy, the type of SI and the system conditions. Apparent adsorption (Γapp) experiments, described previously (Kahrwad et al. 2008), are used to show when the SI/substrate interaction is pure adsorption (Γ) or coupled adsorption (Γ)/precipitation (∏). Experiments were performed for different SIs at various operational conditions, i.e. initial pH values, minerologies - calcite, limestone and dolomite - and temperatures; the overall results from these coupled Γ/∏ experiments are summarised in Table 3. The SI species used in this study included 1 phosphonate (DETPMP), 1 phosphate ester (PAPE) and 3 polymeric scale inhibitors (PPCA, PFC, VS-Co); the full names of these SIs are given in the paper. All precipitates were studied using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-Ray (ESEM/EDX) and Particle Size Analysis (PSA). These measurements confirmed that when precipitation occurred, it was mainly in the bulk solution and not on the rock surface.
For all SIs, both adsorption (Γ) and precipitation (∏) retention mechanisms were observed, with the dominant mechanism depending on SI chemistry, temperature and mineralogy. Differences were observed between the "apparent adsorption" (Γapp) levels of polymeric, phosphonate and phosphate ester scale inhibitors, as follows: For the polymeric SIs (PPCA, PFC and VS-Co), the highest retention levels were observed at low pH for all carbonate substrates, due to the increase in divalent cations (Ca2+ and Mg2+) available from rock dissolution for SI-M2+ precipitation. For phosphonate (DETPMP) and phosphate ester (PAPE) SIs, the retention level was greatest at higher pH values, as the SI functional groups were more dissociated and hence available for complexation with M2+ ions.The polymeric VS-Co showed the lowest amount of precipitation (Γapp ~ 1.2 mg/g) in contact with dolomite substrate due to the presence of sulphonate groups (low pKa); indeed this showed low Γapp which was predominantly pure adsorption. However, a small amount of precipitate was observed by ESEM/EDX and PSA.For polymeric inhibitors, the retention level (Γapp) was highest on calcite (highest relative calcium content), followed by limestone and then dolomite. Phosphonate and phosphate ester SIs showed the highest retention levels on dolomite (higher final solution pH and more SI dissociated), followed by limestone and calcite.For all SI species, higher retention (more precipitation, ∏) was observed at elevated temperature. At lower temperatures, a more extended region of pure adsorption was observed for all SIs.
The information presented in this study will help us in SI product selection for application of squeeze treatments with longer squeeze lifetimes in carbonate reservoir based on mineralogy and reservoir conditions. In addition, this study provides valuable data for validating models of the SI/Carbonate/Ca/Mg system which can be incorporated in squeeze design simulations.