泥炭生物气化工艺的可行性

M.G. Buivid, D.L. Wise, A.M. Rader, P.L. McCarty, W.F. Owen
{"title":"泥炭生物气化工艺的可行性","authors":"M.G. Buivid,&nbsp;D.L. Wise,&nbsp;A.M. Rader,&nbsp;P.L. McCarty,&nbsp;W.F. Owen","doi":"10.1016/0304-3967(80)90027-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A feasibility study was conducted to determine if biogasification may be an economical process for the conversion of peat into pipeline quality methane (SNG). United States' peat resources, in terms of energy content, are greater than the energy recoverable from uranium, shale oil, or the combined reserves of petroleum and natural gas. Experiments and costing of SNG by the biogasification of peat were based on a two-stage process. In the first (assumed to follow wet harvesting of peat) an alkaline oxidation pretreatment of peat was employed to produce soluble, low molecular weight acids, wood sugars, and other soluble organic fragments. Unreacted peat solids were separated (to be processed as a potential boiler fuel) while the recovered liquid, containing the soluble organic material, was anaerobically fermented to methane and carbon dioxide in the second stage of the process. In this study, up to 26% of the energy value in peat was converted to methane in the two-stage process; more than 50% of the material from the first stage was fermented to methane in the second. More work is needed to optimize the first stage. Preliminary cost estimates are: a 79.2 × 10<sup>3</sup> GJ/day (75.0 billion BTU/day) plant, the total capital requirement is approximately $323 million (April 1978 costs). The annual operating cost is approximately $44 million. For a plant operating at a 90% stream factor, with peat delivered to the plant site as a 3% solids slurry at a cost of $0.0033/kg ($3/ton) dry peat, the average cost for SNG is estimated as $3.16/GJ ($3.34/million BTU). A significant advantage of biogasification appears to be that technical difficulties of dewatering, necessary for peat utilization in conventional gasification or direct combustion, are eliminated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101078,"journal":{"name":"Resource Recovery and Conservation","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 117-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3967(80)90027-X","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a peat biogasification process\",\"authors\":\"M.G. Buivid,&nbsp;D.L. Wise,&nbsp;A.M. Rader,&nbsp;P.L. McCarty,&nbsp;W.F. Owen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0304-3967(80)90027-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A feasibility study was conducted to determine if biogasification may be an economical process for the conversion of peat into pipeline quality methane (SNG). United States' peat resources, in terms of energy content, are greater than the energy recoverable from uranium, shale oil, or the combined reserves of petroleum and natural gas. Experiments and costing of SNG by the biogasification of peat were based on a two-stage process. In the first (assumed to follow wet harvesting of peat) an alkaline oxidation pretreatment of peat was employed to produce soluble, low molecular weight acids, wood sugars, and other soluble organic fragments. Unreacted peat solids were separated (to be processed as a potential boiler fuel) while the recovered liquid, containing the soluble organic material, was anaerobically fermented to methane and carbon dioxide in the second stage of the process. In this study, up to 26% of the energy value in peat was converted to methane in the two-stage process; more than 50% of the material from the first stage was fermented to methane in the second. More work is needed to optimize the first stage. Preliminary cost estimates are: a 79.2 × 10<sup>3</sup> GJ/day (75.0 billion BTU/day) plant, the total capital requirement is approximately $323 million (April 1978 costs). The annual operating cost is approximately $44 million. For a plant operating at a 90% stream factor, with peat delivered to the plant site as a 3% solids slurry at a cost of $0.0033/kg ($3/ton) dry peat, the average cost for SNG is estimated as $3.16/GJ ($3.34/million BTU). A significant advantage of biogasification appears to be that technical difficulties of dewatering, necessary for peat utilization in conventional gasification or direct combustion, are eliminated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resource Recovery and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 117-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3967(80)90027-X\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resource Recovery and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030439678090027X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource Recovery and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030439678090027X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

进行了可行性研究,以确定生物气化是否可能是将泥炭转化为管道质量甲烷(SNG)的经济过程。就能量含量而言,美国的泥炭资源比铀、页岩油或石油和天然气联合储量的可采能源还要多。泥炭生物气化制煤的实验和成本是基于两个阶段的过程。第一种方法(假定是湿法采收泥炭)采用泥炭的碱性氧化预处理来生产可溶性的低分子量酸、木糖和其他可溶性有机碎片。未反应的泥炭固体被分离(作为潜在的锅炉燃料进行处理),而回收的含有可溶性有机物质的液体在该过程的第二阶段厌氧发酵成甲烷和二氧化碳。在本研究中,泥炭中高达26%的能量值在两阶段过程中转化为甲烷;第一阶段50%以上的原料在第二阶段发酵成甲烷。需要做更多的工作来优化第一阶段。初步成本估计为:79.2 × 103 GJ/天(750亿BTU/天)的工厂,总资本需求约为3.23亿美元(1978年4月成本)。每年的运营成本约为4400万美元。对于流系数为90%的工厂,泥炭以3%固体浆液的形式输送到工厂现场,成本为0.0033美元/kg(3美元/吨)干泥炭,煤制天然气的平均成本估计为3.16美元/GJ(334美元/百万BTU)。生物气化的一个显著优点似乎是消除了脱水的技术困难,而脱水是在传统气化或直接燃烧中利用泥炭所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of a peat biogasification process

A feasibility study was conducted to determine if biogasification may be an economical process for the conversion of peat into pipeline quality methane (SNG). United States' peat resources, in terms of energy content, are greater than the energy recoverable from uranium, shale oil, or the combined reserves of petroleum and natural gas. Experiments and costing of SNG by the biogasification of peat were based on a two-stage process. In the first (assumed to follow wet harvesting of peat) an alkaline oxidation pretreatment of peat was employed to produce soluble, low molecular weight acids, wood sugars, and other soluble organic fragments. Unreacted peat solids were separated (to be processed as a potential boiler fuel) while the recovered liquid, containing the soluble organic material, was anaerobically fermented to methane and carbon dioxide in the second stage of the process. In this study, up to 26% of the energy value in peat was converted to methane in the two-stage process; more than 50% of the material from the first stage was fermented to methane in the second. More work is needed to optimize the first stage. Preliminary cost estimates are: a 79.2 × 103 GJ/day (75.0 billion BTU/day) plant, the total capital requirement is approximately $323 million (April 1978 costs). The annual operating cost is approximately $44 million. For a plant operating at a 90% stream factor, with peat delivered to the plant site as a 3% solids slurry at a cost of $0.0033/kg ($3/ton) dry peat, the average cost for SNG is estimated as $3.16/GJ ($3.34/million BTU). A significant advantage of biogasification appears to be that technical difficulties of dewatering, necessary for peat utilization in conventional gasification or direct combustion, are eliminated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信