语用学研究意义的起源与发展:符号学视角

Min Niu
{"title":"语用学研究意义的起源与发展:符号学视角","authors":"Min Niu","doi":"10.1515/lass-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pragmatics has grown into a flourishing independent academic discipline. Undefined and unsolved are, nevertheless, such confusing and controversial concerns in its evolution as research boundaries and uncertain definition. Some academics view Austin᾽s Speech Act Theory to be the birth of pragmatics, which certainly confines pragmatics to the field of linguistics and hence limits its study scope. This assertion is incongruous with Morris’ primary objective of proposing the word pragmatics from the standpoint of semiotics, inspired by Peirce. This research intends to investigate pragmatics from the perspective of linguistic philosophy and semiotics and argues that pragmatics derives and develops from Peirce’s pragmatist semiotics and Morris’ behavioral semiotics. Pragmatics is the exertion of the “interpretant” in Pierce’s Semiotics. Clearly, it is one of the three branches of Morris’s semiotics that investigates the relationship between signs and sign users. The meaning of signs is derived from the interpretation of sign users. Pierce’s pragmatism or pragmaticism is the intellectual foundation of pragmatics. As its research objective, it focuses on the relationship between meaning and context, i.e., the illocutionary meaning not covered by the study of semantics. Its primary methodology is based on logical reasoning.","PeriodicalId":74056,"journal":{"name":"Language and semiotic studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The origin and development of pragmatics as a study of meaning: semiotic perspective\",\"authors\":\"Min Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/lass-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Pragmatics has grown into a flourishing independent academic discipline. Undefined and unsolved are, nevertheless, such confusing and controversial concerns in its evolution as research boundaries and uncertain definition. Some academics view Austin᾽s Speech Act Theory to be the birth of pragmatics, which certainly confines pragmatics to the field of linguistics and hence limits its study scope. This assertion is incongruous with Morris’ primary objective of proposing the word pragmatics from the standpoint of semiotics, inspired by Peirce. This research intends to investigate pragmatics from the perspective of linguistic philosophy and semiotics and argues that pragmatics derives and develops from Peirce’s pragmatist semiotics and Morris’ behavioral semiotics. Pragmatics is the exertion of the “interpretant” in Pierce’s Semiotics. Clearly, it is one of the three branches of Morris’s semiotics that investigates the relationship between signs and sign users. The meaning of signs is derived from the interpretation of sign users. Pierce’s pragmatism or pragmaticism is the intellectual foundation of pragmatics. As its research objective, it focuses on the relationship between meaning and context, i.e., the illocutionary meaning not covered by the study of semantics. Its primary methodology is based on logical reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and semiotic studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and semiotic studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and semiotic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语用学已经发展成为一门蓬勃发展的独立学科。然而,未定义和未解决在其演变过程中是研究边界和定义不确定等令人困惑和争议的问题。一些学者认为Austin的言语行为理论是语用学的诞生,这无疑将语用学局限于语言学领域,从而限制了它的研究范围。这一主张与莫里斯受皮尔斯启发,从符号学的角度提出语用学这个词的主要目标是不一致的。本文拟从语言哲学和符号学的角度对语用学进行考察,认为语用学是皮尔斯的实用主义符号学和莫里斯的行为符号学的衍生和发展。语用学是皮尔斯符号学中“解释者”的运用。显然,它是莫里斯符号学的三个分支之一,研究符号和符号使用者之间的关系。符号的意义来源于符号使用者的解释。皮尔斯的实用主义或语用主义是语用学的思想基础。它的研究目标是意义与语境的关系,即语义学研究范围之外的言外意义。它的主要方法论是基于逻辑推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The origin and development of pragmatics as a study of meaning: semiotic perspective
Abstract Pragmatics has grown into a flourishing independent academic discipline. Undefined and unsolved are, nevertheless, such confusing and controversial concerns in its evolution as research boundaries and uncertain definition. Some academics view Austin᾽s Speech Act Theory to be the birth of pragmatics, which certainly confines pragmatics to the field of linguistics and hence limits its study scope. This assertion is incongruous with Morris’ primary objective of proposing the word pragmatics from the standpoint of semiotics, inspired by Peirce. This research intends to investigate pragmatics from the perspective of linguistic philosophy and semiotics and argues that pragmatics derives and develops from Peirce’s pragmatist semiotics and Morris’ behavioral semiotics. Pragmatics is the exertion of the “interpretant” in Pierce’s Semiotics. Clearly, it is one of the three branches of Morris’s semiotics that investigates the relationship between signs and sign users. The meaning of signs is derived from the interpretation of sign users. Pierce’s pragmatism or pragmaticism is the intellectual foundation of pragmatics. As its research objective, it focuses on the relationship between meaning and context, i.e., the illocutionary meaning not covered by the study of semantics. Its primary methodology is based on logical reasoning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信