一组优秀攀岩者、休闲攀岩者和非攀岩者的人体测量特征和体型的比较

M.F. Novoa-Vignau, O. Salas-Fraire, K. Salas-Longoria, G. Hernández-Suárez, M. Menchaca-Pérez
{"title":"一组优秀攀岩者、休闲攀岩者和非攀岩者的人体测量特征和体型的比较","authors":"M.F. Novoa-Vignau,&nbsp;O. Salas-Fraire,&nbsp;K. Salas-Longoria,&nbsp;G. Hernández-Suárez,&nbsp;M. Menchaca-Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.rmu.2017.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sport climbing has become a very popular and competitive sport. Despite growing interest in the research of climbing, there is still scant evidence regarding the adaptations it produces in the anthropometric characteristics of climbers. The objective of this study was to provide descriptive data about the anthropometric and somatotype characteristics of a group of elite and recreational climbers and compare them with a group of healthy non-climber volunteers. Twelve elite climbers (9 males and 3 females), 10 recreational climbers (7 males and 3 females), and 10 healthy non-climbers (6 males and 4 females) were assessed. Body mass, height, body mass index (BMI) and anthropometric measurements were used to obtain body fat percentage (BF%) and somatotype according to the Heath-Carter protocol. We found that females and males elite climbers (EC) have a significantly lower BF% and endomorphic component (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) than non-climbers (NC). EC males also showed a significantly lower (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) BMI than NC males. No differences were found between the anthropometric characteristics of EC and recreational climbers (RC); however, the EC had significantly higher mean results (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) in climbing ability level and years of experience. The mesomorphic component was dominant in both groups of climbers. We concluded that EC, both males and females, are thin individuals with a predominance of musculoskeletal development, significantly less endomorphic characteristics, more ectomorphic characteristics and a lower BF% than the general population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34640,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Universitaria","volume":"19 75","pages":"Pages 69-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmu.2017.05.006","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of anthropometric characteristics and somatotypes in a group of elite climbers, recreational climbers and non-climbers\",\"authors\":\"M.F. Novoa-Vignau,&nbsp;O. Salas-Fraire,&nbsp;K. Salas-Longoria,&nbsp;G. Hernández-Suárez,&nbsp;M. Menchaca-Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmu.2017.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sport climbing has become a very popular and competitive sport. Despite growing interest in the research of climbing, there is still scant evidence regarding the adaptations it produces in the anthropometric characteristics of climbers. The objective of this study was to provide descriptive data about the anthropometric and somatotype characteristics of a group of elite and recreational climbers and compare them with a group of healthy non-climber volunteers. Twelve elite climbers (9 males and 3 females), 10 recreational climbers (7 males and 3 females), and 10 healthy non-climbers (6 males and 4 females) were assessed. Body mass, height, body mass index (BMI) and anthropometric measurements were used to obtain body fat percentage (BF%) and somatotype according to the Heath-Carter protocol. We found that females and males elite climbers (EC) have a significantly lower BF% and endomorphic component (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) than non-climbers (NC). EC males also showed a significantly lower (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) BMI than NC males. No differences were found between the anthropometric characteristics of EC and recreational climbers (RC); however, the EC had significantly higher mean results (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) in climbing ability level and years of experience. The mesomorphic component was dominant in both groups of climbers. We concluded that EC, both males and females, are thin individuals with a predominance of musculoskeletal development, significantly less endomorphic characteristics, more ectomorphic characteristics and a lower BF% than the general population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Universitaria\",\"volume\":\"19 75\",\"pages\":\"Pages 69-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmu.2017.05.006\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Universitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665579617300418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Universitaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665579617300418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

运动攀岩已经成为一项非常受欢迎的竞技运动。尽管人们对攀岩的研究越来越感兴趣,但关于攀岩对攀登者的人体特征产生的适应性的证据仍然很少。本研究的目的是提供一组精英登山者和休闲登山者的人体测量学和体型特征的描述性数据,并将其与一组健康的非登山者志愿者进行比较。评估了12名优秀登山者(男9女3)、10名休闲登山者(男7女3)和10名健康非登山者(男6女4)。根据Heath-Carter方案,采用身体质量、身高、身体质量指数(BMI)和人体测量来获得体脂率(BF%)和体型。研究发现,雌雄精英攀登者(EC)的BF%和自同态成分(p <0.05)高于非攀登者(NC)。EC男性也表现出显著降低(p <0.05) BMI高于NC男性。休闲攀登者(EC)与休闲攀登者(RC)的人体测量特征无显著差异;然而,EC有显著更高的平均结果(p <攀爬能力水平与经验年数差异0.05)。中胚成分在两组攀援植物中均占主导地位。我们得出的结论是,欧共体,无论男性还是女性,都是瘦弱的个体,肌肉骨骼发育占优势,显着减少自同态特征,更多的生态形态特征和比一般人群更低的BF%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of anthropometric characteristics and somatotypes in a group of elite climbers, recreational climbers and non-climbers

Sport climbing has become a very popular and competitive sport. Despite growing interest in the research of climbing, there is still scant evidence regarding the adaptations it produces in the anthropometric characteristics of climbers. The objective of this study was to provide descriptive data about the anthropometric and somatotype characteristics of a group of elite and recreational climbers and compare them with a group of healthy non-climber volunteers. Twelve elite climbers (9 males and 3 females), 10 recreational climbers (7 males and 3 females), and 10 healthy non-climbers (6 males and 4 females) were assessed. Body mass, height, body mass index (BMI) and anthropometric measurements were used to obtain body fat percentage (BF%) and somatotype according to the Heath-Carter protocol. We found that females and males elite climbers (EC) have a significantly lower BF% and endomorphic component (p < 0.05) than non-climbers (NC). EC males also showed a significantly lower (p < 0.05) BMI than NC males. No differences were found between the anthropometric characteristics of EC and recreational climbers (RC); however, the EC had significantly higher mean results (p < 0.05) in climbing ability level and years of experience. The mesomorphic component was dominant in both groups of climbers. We concluded that EC, both males and females, are thin individuals with a predominance of musculoskeletal development, significantly less endomorphic characteristics, more ectomorphic characteristics and a lower BF% than the general population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信