mulligan和cyriax入路治疗亚急性外上髁炎的疗效

Sammar Abbas, R. Riaz, A. Khan, A. Javed, S. Raza
{"title":"mulligan和cyriax入路治疗亚急性外上髁炎的疗效","authors":"Sammar Abbas, R. Riaz, A. Khan, A. Javed, S. Raza","doi":"10.52567/trj.v3i02.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine and compare the effects of Deep Transverse Friction (DTF) Massage and Mill’s manipulation (Cyriax) with Mobilization with movement (MWM) and Taping (Mulligan) in lateral epicondylitis patients. Material & Methods: A Randomized Control Trial (NCT03848117) was conducted in Physiotherapy Department of DHQ Hospital Bahawalnagar after the approval from the competent authority. Non-probability convenient sampling technique was used to collect sample. The n=30 sample size was randomly allocated in two groups as Group A i.e. the Cyriax group (DTF Massage & Mill’s Manipulation) and Group B i.e. the Mulligan group (Taping & MWM), with 15 participants in each group having sub acute lateral epicondylitis. Data was collected in terms of age, gender, BMI and occupation. Patient related tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire was used to determine the level of pain, functional disability and hand grip strength. Mann Whitney U statistics test was used for between the group analysis and Friedman with Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for within the group analysis. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Results: The mean±SD age of subjects in Cyriax group was 33.60±6.864 years and in Mulligan group was 36.93±7.741 years. MWM with taping and Mill’s manipulation with DTF massage both showed significant improvement (p<0.001) in pain, function ability and handgrip strength throughout the treatment duration. When comparing the both group regarding pain, Cyriax approach showed significant improvement after 2nd week while mulligan’s approach showed more improvement than Cyriax approach (p<0.001) in functional ability from 2ndto 3rd week. Hand grip strength in both groups did not show any significant difference (p≥0.05). Conclusion: Mobilization with movement& taping (Mulligan) and mill’s manipulation with DTF massage (Cyriax), both are effective in improving pain, functional ability and handgrip strength in lateral epicondylitis. Cyriax approach is more effective in relieving pain in lateral epicondylitis as compare to Mulligan’s approach. On the other hand, functional ability, more improve with Mulligan’s approach. But both treatments are equally effective in improving hand grip strength in lateral epicondylitis. Keywords: Tennis elbow, mobilization with movement, hand grip strength, patient rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE), Deep Transverse friction massage.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"41 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECTS OF MULLIGAN AND CYRIAX APPROACH IN PATIENTS WITH SUBACUTE LATERAL EPICONDYLITIS\",\"authors\":\"Sammar Abbas, R. Riaz, A. Khan, A. Javed, S. Raza\",\"doi\":\"10.52567/trj.v3i02.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To determine and compare the effects of Deep Transverse Friction (DTF) Massage and Mill’s manipulation (Cyriax) with Mobilization with movement (MWM) and Taping (Mulligan) in lateral epicondylitis patients. Material & Methods: A Randomized Control Trial (NCT03848117) was conducted in Physiotherapy Department of DHQ Hospital Bahawalnagar after the approval from the competent authority. Non-probability convenient sampling technique was used to collect sample. The n=30 sample size was randomly allocated in two groups as Group A i.e. the Cyriax group (DTF Massage & Mill’s Manipulation) and Group B i.e. the Mulligan group (Taping & MWM), with 15 participants in each group having sub acute lateral epicondylitis. Data was collected in terms of age, gender, BMI and occupation. Patient related tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire was used to determine the level of pain, functional disability and hand grip strength. Mann Whitney U statistics test was used for between the group analysis and Friedman with Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for within the group analysis. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Results: The mean±SD age of subjects in Cyriax group was 33.60±6.864 years and in Mulligan group was 36.93±7.741 years. MWM with taping and Mill’s manipulation with DTF massage both showed significant improvement (p<0.001) in pain, function ability and handgrip strength throughout the treatment duration. When comparing the both group regarding pain, Cyriax approach showed significant improvement after 2nd week while mulligan’s approach showed more improvement than Cyriax approach (p<0.001) in functional ability from 2ndto 3rd week. Hand grip strength in both groups did not show any significant difference (p≥0.05). Conclusion: Mobilization with movement& taping (Mulligan) and mill’s manipulation with DTF massage (Cyriax), both are effective in improving pain, functional ability and handgrip strength in lateral epicondylitis. Cyriax approach is more effective in relieving pain in lateral epicondylitis as compare to Mulligan’s approach. On the other hand, functional ability, more improve with Mulligan’s approach. But both treatments are equally effective in improving hand grip strength in lateral epicondylitis. Keywords: Tennis elbow, mobilization with movement, hand grip strength, patient rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE), Deep Transverse friction massage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"volume\":\"41 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52567/trj.v3i02.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52567/trj.v3i02.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨并比较深横向摩擦(DTF)按摩、密氏手法(Cyriax)配合动员配合运动(MWM)和粘带(Mulligan)治疗外上髁炎的疗效。材料与方法:经主管部门批准,在巴哈瓦尔纳格尔DHQ医院理疗科进行随机对照试验(NCT03848117)。采用非概率方便抽样技术采集样本。n=30的样本量随机分为两组,A组即Cyriax组(DTF按摩和Mill 's手法)和B组即Mulligan组(贴敷和MWM),每组15名参与者患有亚急性外上髁炎。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、身体质量指数和职业。使用患者相关网球肘评估(PRTEE)问卷来确定疼痛程度、功能残疾和手握力。组间分析采用Mann Whitney U统计检验,组内分析采用Friedman与Wilcoxon符号秩检验。显著性水平为p<0.05。结果:Cyriax组患者平均±SD年龄为33.60±6.864岁,Mulligan组患者平均±SD年龄为36.93±7.741岁。在整个治疗过程中,MWM加胶带和Mill 's手法加DTF按摩在疼痛、功能能力和握力方面均有显著改善(p<0.001)。两组疼痛比较,第2周Cyriax入路明显改善,第2 - 3周mulligan入路功能改善明显优于Cyriax入路(p<0.001)。两组握力差异无统计学意义(p≥0.05)。结论:Mulligan手法与mill手法配合Cyriax手法均能有效改善外上髁炎患者的疼痛、功能能力和握力。与Mulligan入路相比,Cyriax入路在缓解外侧上髁炎疼痛方面更有效。另一方面,在穆里根的方法下,功能能力得到了更多的提高。但两种治疗方法在改善外上髁炎患者的握力方面同样有效。关键词:网球肘,运动动员,手握力,患者评价网球肘评价(PRTEE),深横向摩擦按摩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFECTS OF MULLIGAN AND CYRIAX APPROACH IN PATIENTS WITH SUBACUTE LATERAL EPICONDYLITIS
Objective: To determine and compare the effects of Deep Transverse Friction (DTF) Massage and Mill’s manipulation (Cyriax) with Mobilization with movement (MWM) and Taping (Mulligan) in lateral epicondylitis patients. Material & Methods: A Randomized Control Trial (NCT03848117) was conducted in Physiotherapy Department of DHQ Hospital Bahawalnagar after the approval from the competent authority. Non-probability convenient sampling technique was used to collect sample. The n=30 sample size was randomly allocated in two groups as Group A i.e. the Cyriax group (DTF Massage & Mill’s Manipulation) and Group B i.e. the Mulligan group (Taping & MWM), with 15 participants in each group having sub acute lateral epicondylitis. Data was collected in terms of age, gender, BMI and occupation. Patient related tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire was used to determine the level of pain, functional disability and hand grip strength. Mann Whitney U statistics test was used for between the group analysis and Friedman with Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for within the group analysis. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Results: The mean±SD age of subjects in Cyriax group was 33.60±6.864 years and in Mulligan group was 36.93±7.741 years. MWM with taping and Mill’s manipulation with DTF massage both showed significant improvement (p<0.001) in pain, function ability and handgrip strength throughout the treatment duration. When comparing the both group regarding pain, Cyriax approach showed significant improvement after 2nd week while mulligan’s approach showed more improvement than Cyriax approach (p<0.001) in functional ability from 2ndto 3rd week. Hand grip strength in both groups did not show any significant difference (p≥0.05). Conclusion: Mobilization with movement& taping (Mulligan) and mill’s manipulation with DTF massage (Cyriax), both are effective in improving pain, functional ability and handgrip strength in lateral epicondylitis. Cyriax approach is more effective in relieving pain in lateral epicondylitis as compare to Mulligan’s approach. On the other hand, functional ability, more improve with Mulligan’s approach. But both treatments are equally effective in improving hand grip strength in lateral epicondylitis. Keywords: Tennis elbow, mobilization with movement, hand grip strength, patient rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE), Deep Transverse friction massage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信