Esther Talboom-Kamp , Pim Ketelaar , Anke Versluis
{"title":"支持初级保健中慢性病患者自我管理的国家项目:投资的社会回报分析","authors":"Esther Talboom-Kamp , Pim Ketelaar , Anke Versluis","doi":"10.1016/j.ceh.2021.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Chronic care patients can play an important role in the self-management of their disease; however, large-scale implementation of self-management has been challenging. To aid and stimulate self-management in primary care, a Dutch cooperation supported healthcare providers in primary care, through collective healthcare groups, who wanted to implement and execute a self-management program. The program aimed to increase the quality of life (QoL) in people with a chronic condition and simultaneously reduce healthcare costs.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to assess the public value of the self-management program that was available for approximately 375.000 chronically ill patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Social Return on Investment analysis was carried out. The analysis is based on the principles of a cost-benefit analysis, and attributes monetary value to the social return of the self-management program in primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis of the self-management program showed that each euro invested translated to a social return of 4.90 euros per patient per year (measured over 5 years). This result was mainly caused by an increase in QoL and a decrease in healthcare costs. Importantly, the results show that costs and benefits were inequitably distributed across the relevant stakeholders.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The results show that self-management support programs in primary care can provide a social return on investment. There is a clear need for lasting support for healthcare providers, both material and non-material, to enable successful implementation of self-management programs in practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100268,"journal":{"name":"Clinical eHealth","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 45-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ceh.2021.02.001","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A national program to support self-management for patients with a chronic condition in primary care: A social return on investment analysis\",\"authors\":\"Esther Talboom-Kamp , Pim Ketelaar , Anke Versluis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ceh.2021.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Chronic care patients can play an important role in the self-management of their disease; however, large-scale implementation of self-management has been challenging. To aid and stimulate self-management in primary care, a Dutch cooperation supported healthcare providers in primary care, through collective healthcare groups, who wanted to implement and execute a self-management program. The program aimed to increase the quality of life (QoL) in people with a chronic condition and simultaneously reduce healthcare costs.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to assess the public value of the self-management program that was available for approximately 375.000 chronically ill patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Social Return on Investment analysis was carried out. The analysis is based on the principles of a cost-benefit analysis, and attributes monetary value to the social return of the self-management program in primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis of the self-management program showed that each euro invested translated to a social return of 4.90 euros per patient per year (measured over 5 years). This result was mainly caused by an increase in QoL and a decrease in healthcare costs. Importantly, the results show that costs and benefits were inequitably distributed across the relevant stakeholders.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The results show that self-management support programs in primary care can provide a social return on investment. There is a clear need for lasting support for healthcare providers, both material and non-material, to enable successful implementation of self-management programs in practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical eHealth\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 45-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ceh.2021.02.001\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical eHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588914121000046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical eHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588914121000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A national program to support self-management for patients with a chronic condition in primary care: A social return on investment analysis
Background
Chronic care patients can play an important role in the self-management of their disease; however, large-scale implementation of self-management has been challenging. To aid and stimulate self-management in primary care, a Dutch cooperation supported healthcare providers in primary care, through collective healthcare groups, who wanted to implement and execute a self-management program. The program aimed to increase the quality of life (QoL) in people with a chronic condition and simultaneously reduce healthcare costs.
Objective
The aim of this study was to assess the public value of the self-management program that was available for approximately 375.000 chronically ill patients.
Methods
A Social Return on Investment analysis was carried out. The analysis is based on the principles of a cost-benefit analysis, and attributes monetary value to the social return of the self-management program in primary care.
Results
The analysis of the self-management program showed that each euro invested translated to a social return of 4.90 euros per patient per year (measured over 5 years). This result was mainly caused by an increase in QoL and a decrease in healthcare costs. Importantly, the results show that costs and benefits were inequitably distributed across the relevant stakeholders.
Discussion
The results show that self-management support programs in primary care can provide a social return on investment. There is a clear need for lasting support for healthcare providers, both material and non-material, to enable successful implementation of self-management programs in practice.