潮汐能发电:结合兰开斯特0-D发电和成本模型的案例研究

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
David Vandercruyssen, S. Baker, D. Howard, G. Aggidis
{"title":"潮汐能发电:结合兰开斯特0-D发电和成本模型的案例研究","authors":"David Vandercruyssen, S. Baker, D. Howard, G. Aggidis","doi":"10.1680/jener.22.00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial viability and political will ultimately determine if tidal range power schemes are developed. This research aims to demonstrate a robust system to make initial estimates of capital costs for tidal range schemes that can be compared between systems and options. A levelised cost of energy (LCOE) is used to compare a tidal range barrage (Morecambe Bay) and a coastal tidal lagoon (North Wales); the schemes are set in context with other common energy sources. The results show the Morecambe Bay barrage generates marginally more electricity than the North Wales coastal lagoon and has a shorter impoundment at lower cost. However, the economic arguments for both schemes are similar; both are viable as the LCOE shows. Despite being shown to be financially viable, the sources of funding may remain a problem. Financial returns and two potential public funding mechanisms are discussed. The approach using two simple models makes a strong case for more detailed analysis and, in the current environmental, economic, and social climate serious decisions must be taken. Highlights · Initial estimation of capital cost for tidal range case studies using 5-main components · Optimisation of generator rating, number of turbines and sluices · Levelised cost of energy (LCOE). · Revenue and funding mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":48776,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tidal range power generation: case studies combining the Lancaster 0-D generation and cost models\",\"authors\":\"David Vandercruyssen, S. Baker, D. Howard, G. Aggidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jener.22.00077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Financial viability and political will ultimately determine if tidal range power schemes are developed. This research aims to demonstrate a robust system to make initial estimates of capital costs for tidal range schemes that can be compared between systems and options. A levelised cost of energy (LCOE) is used to compare a tidal range barrage (Morecambe Bay) and a coastal tidal lagoon (North Wales); the schemes are set in context with other common energy sources. The results show the Morecambe Bay barrage generates marginally more electricity than the North Wales coastal lagoon and has a shorter impoundment at lower cost. However, the economic arguments for both schemes are similar; both are viable as the LCOE shows. Despite being shown to be financially viable, the sources of funding may remain a problem. Financial returns and two potential public funding mechanisms are discussed. The approach using two simple models makes a strong case for more detailed analysis and, in the current environmental, economic, and social climate serious decisions must be taken. Highlights · Initial estimation of capital cost for tidal range case studies using 5-main components · Optimisation of generator rating, number of turbines and sluices · Levelised cost of energy (LCOE). · Revenue and funding mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jener.22.00077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jener.22.00077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财政可行性和政治意愿最终决定潮汐能发电计划是否得到开发。这项研究的目的是证明一个强大的系统,可以对潮差方案的资本成本进行初步估计,从而可以在系统和选项之间进行比较。平准化能源成本(LCOE)用于比较潮汐差拦河坝(莫克姆湾)和沿海潮汐泻湖(北威尔士);这些方案是在其他常见能源的背景下制定的。结果表明,莫克姆湾拦河坝产生的电力略高于北威尔士沿海泻湖,而且蓄水时间较短,成本较低。然而,这两种方案的经济论据是相似的;正如LCOE所示,两者都是可行的。尽管在财政上可行,但资金来源可能仍然是一个问题。讨论了财务回报和两种潜在的公共资助机制。使用两个简单模型的方法为更详细的分析提供了强有力的理由,在当前的环境、经济和社会气候下,必须做出严肃的决定。·使用5个主要组件对潮差案例研究的资本成本进行初步估计·发电机额定功率、涡轮机和水闸数量的优化·平差能源成本(LCOE)。·收入和资金机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tidal range power generation: case studies combining the Lancaster 0-D generation and cost models
Financial viability and political will ultimately determine if tidal range power schemes are developed. This research aims to demonstrate a robust system to make initial estimates of capital costs for tidal range schemes that can be compared between systems and options. A levelised cost of energy (LCOE) is used to compare a tidal range barrage (Morecambe Bay) and a coastal tidal lagoon (North Wales); the schemes are set in context with other common energy sources. The results show the Morecambe Bay barrage generates marginally more electricity than the North Wales coastal lagoon and has a shorter impoundment at lower cost. However, the economic arguments for both schemes are similar; both are viable as the LCOE shows. Despite being shown to be financially viable, the sources of funding may remain a problem. Financial returns and two potential public funding mechanisms are discussed. The approach using two simple models makes a strong case for more detailed analysis and, in the current environmental, economic, and social climate serious decisions must be taken. Highlights · Initial estimation of capital cost for tidal range case studies using 5-main components · Optimisation of generator rating, number of turbines and sluices · Levelised cost of energy (LCOE). · Revenue and funding mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Energy addresses the challenges of energy engineering in the 21st century. The journal publishes groundbreaking papers on energy provision by leading figures in industry and academia and provides a unique forum for discussion on everything from underground coal gasification to the practical implications of biofuels. The journal is a key resource for engineers and researchers working to meet the challenges of energy engineering. Topics addressed include: development of sustainable energy policy, energy efficiency in buildings, infrastructure and transport systems, renewable energy sources, operation and decommissioning of projects, and energy conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信