{"title":"政策辩论:在韩国应急管理中走向平衡的研发","authors":"Kyoo‐Man Ha","doi":"10.5172/IMPP.V15I2.1228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applying findings for other RD (2) Firefighters, civil engineers, and business scholars should refrain from spreading misleading knowledge on advanced nations’ RD and (3) The Korea Institute of Fire Industry & Technology (KFI) and the National Institute for Disaster Prevention (NIDP) need to diversify their resources for evaluators to improve the lopsided R&D evaluation. In short, the major tenet of this paper is that Korea should ultimately shift toward a balanced R&D.","PeriodicalId":13564,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy debate: Moving toward balanced R&D in Korean emergency management\",\"authors\":\"Kyoo‐Man Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.5172/IMPP.V15I2.1228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Applying findings for other RD (2) Firefighters, civil engineers, and business scholars should refrain from spreading misleading knowledge on advanced nations’ RD and (3) The Korea Institute of Fire Industry & Technology (KFI) and the National Institute for Disaster Prevention (NIDP) need to diversify their resources for evaluators to improve the lopsided R&D evaluation. In short, the major tenet of this paper is that Korea should ultimately shift toward a balanced R&D.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation-management Policy & Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation-management Policy & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5172/IMPP.V15I2.1228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/IMPP.V15I2.1228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Policy debate: Moving toward balanced R&D in Korean emergency management
Applying findings for other RD (2) Firefighters, civil engineers, and business scholars should refrain from spreading misleading knowledge on advanced nations’ RD and (3) The Korea Institute of Fire Industry & Technology (KFI) and the National Institute for Disaster Prevention (NIDP) need to diversify their resources for evaluators to improve the lopsided R&D evaluation. In short, the major tenet of this paper is that Korea should ultimately shift toward a balanced R&D.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
