刑事诉讼研究的方法论基础

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
A. Afanasyev
{"title":"刑事诉讼研究的方法论基础","authors":"A. Afanasyev","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2022.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern criminal procedure science contains many outstanding issues, both theoretical and methodological. To date, the methodology of criminal procedure research, and in general the whole of criminal procedure science, remains unrecognized. Most procedural scientists have little focus in research, both in the object and subject of the study, and in the methodological basis. The main difficulties are caused by incorrect understanding of the methodology of the study. The existing in the field work of criminal procedure confirms not only the narrow approach in the understanding of methodology, but also the error in the interpretation and application of scientific knowledge methods. This situation is mainly based on the lack of formalization of methods of criminal procedure science and limited intra-scientific reflection. In this regard, it is necessary to reassess established methodological values and traditions and to offer a reasoned view of the methodology of criminal procedure science. The article provides an idea of the methodology of science and undertakes a critical analysis of the methodological basis of research in criminal procedure science. As a result of the audit, the author’s proposals are formulated on the universal scheme of methodology and system of methods of criminal procedure study, as well as the logical stages of criminal procedure study. The author concludes that it is necessary to understand methodology as a way to obtain scientific knowledge, as a result of intrascientific reflection on the organization of their own scientific activities, the universality of popular and private scientific methods of research and their replenishment by criminal procedure science. In addition, the conclusion is made on the scientific nature of the criminal procedure field of knowledge. The proposals in the article may form the basis of further developments in the field of criminal proceedings and may also serve as recommendations in the formulation of the methodological basis for research.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological basis for criminal procedure researches\",\"authors\":\"A. Afanasyev\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu14.2022.103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern criminal procedure science contains many outstanding issues, both theoretical and methodological. To date, the methodology of criminal procedure research, and in general the whole of criminal procedure science, remains unrecognized. Most procedural scientists have little focus in research, both in the object and subject of the study, and in the methodological basis. The main difficulties are caused by incorrect understanding of the methodology of the study. The existing in the field work of criminal procedure confirms not only the narrow approach in the understanding of methodology, but also the error in the interpretation and application of scientific knowledge methods. This situation is mainly based on the lack of formalization of methods of criminal procedure science and limited intra-scientific reflection. In this regard, it is necessary to reassess established methodological values and traditions and to offer a reasoned view of the methodology of criminal procedure science. The article provides an idea of the methodology of science and undertakes a critical analysis of the methodological basis of research in criminal procedure science. As a result of the audit, the author’s proposals are formulated on the universal scheme of methodology and system of methods of criminal procedure study, as well as the logical stages of criminal procedure study. The author concludes that it is necessary to understand methodology as a way to obtain scientific knowledge, as a result of intrascientific reflection on the organization of their own scientific activities, the universality of popular and private scientific methods of research and their replenishment by criminal procedure science. In addition, the conclusion is made on the scientific nature of the criminal procedure field of knowledge. The proposals in the article may form the basis of further developments in the field of criminal proceedings and may also serve as recommendations in the formulation of the methodological basis for research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代刑事诉讼科学在理论和方法上都存在许多突出问题。迄今为止,刑事诉讼研究的方法论,以及总体上整个刑事诉讼科学,仍未得到认可。大多数程序科学家很少关注研究,无论是研究对象还是研究主体,还是方法论基础。主要的困难是由于对研究方法的不正确理解造成的。刑事诉讼田野工作中存在的问题,不仅证实了对方法论认识上的狭隘,而且证实了对科学知识方法的解释和应用上的错误。造成这种状况的主要原因是刑事诉讼科学研究方法缺乏形式化,科学内部反思不足。在这方面,有必要重新评估既定的方法论价值和传统,并对刑事诉讼科学的方法论提出合理的看法。本文提出了科学方法论的概念,并对刑事诉讼科学研究的方法论基础进行了批判性分析。在此基础上,笔者提出了刑事诉讼研究的方法论总体方案和方法体系,以及刑事诉讼研究的逻辑阶段。作者的结论是,由于对自己科学活动组织的科学内部反思,大众和私人科学研究方法的普遍性以及刑事诉讼科学对其的补充,有必要将方法论理解为获得科学知识的途径。此外,还对刑事诉讼知识领域的科学性作了总结。该条中的建议可作为刑事诉讼领域进一步发展的基础,也可作为制定研究方法基础的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodological basis for criminal procedure researches
Modern criminal procedure science contains many outstanding issues, both theoretical and methodological. To date, the methodology of criminal procedure research, and in general the whole of criminal procedure science, remains unrecognized. Most procedural scientists have little focus in research, both in the object and subject of the study, and in the methodological basis. The main difficulties are caused by incorrect understanding of the methodology of the study. The existing in the field work of criminal procedure confirms not only the narrow approach in the understanding of methodology, but also the error in the interpretation and application of scientific knowledge methods. This situation is mainly based on the lack of formalization of methods of criminal procedure science and limited intra-scientific reflection. In this regard, it is necessary to reassess established methodological values and traditions and to offer a reasoned view of the methodology of criminal procedure science. The article provides an idea of the methodology of science and undertakes a critical analysis of the methodological basis of research in criminal procedure science. As a result of the audit, the author’s proposals are formulated on the universal scheme of methodology and system of methods of criminal procedure study, as well as the logical stages of criminal procedure study. The author concludes that it is necessary to understand methodology as a way to obtain scientific knowledge, as a result of intrascientific reflection on the organization of their own scientific activities, the universality of popular and private scientific methods of research and their replenishment by criminal procedure science. In addition, the conclusion is made on the scientific nature of the criminal procedure field of knowledge. The proposals in the article may form the basis of further developments in the field of criminal proceedings and may also serve as recommendations in the formulation of the methodological basis for research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信