在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间从抗b细胞治疗转向类风湿关节炎患者后,一项为期12周的开放标签、非介介性研究的结果表明,olokizumab治疗的有效性和安全性

A. Akimova, N. E. Banshchikova, A. Sizikov, A. A. Mullagaliev, E. Letyagina, N. Ilina, Y. Kurochkina, Y. Ubshaeva, V. Omelchenko, O. Chumasova, N. Shkaruba, M. Korolev
{"title":"在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间从抗b细胞治疗转向类风湿关节炎患者后,一项为期12周的开放标签、非介介性研究的结果表明,olokizumab治疗的有效性和安全性","authors":"A. Akimova, N. E. Banshchikova, A. Sizikov, A. A. Mullagaliev, E. Letyagina, N. Ilina, Y. Kurochkina, Y. Ubshaeva, V. Omelchenko, O. Chumasova, N. Shkaruba, M. Korolev","doi":"10.47360/1995-4484-2023-25-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the understanding of the safety profile of therapies for immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). This is primarily due to the negative impact of a number of basic anti-inflammatory drugs (DMARDs) and biological DMARDs on the course and outcomes of a new coronavirus infection. A number of studies have shown that anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) gave a statistically significant increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 and an increase in mortality. At the same time, the analysis of real clinical practice data dictated the need to establish a number of restrictions on the use of certain classes of biological DMARDs and to search for alternative therapy programs to maintain control over disease activity.Purpose of the study – to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug Artlegia® (olokizumab), solution for subcuta neous injection, 160 mg/ml – 0.4 ml, manufactured by R-Pharm JSC, Russia) for the treatment of patients with rheuma toid arthritis in real clinical practice after switching with rituximab during the COVID-19 pandemic.Materials and methods. The study included 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were previously on rituximab therapy at a dose of 1000–500 mg twice with an interval of 2 weeks, who received at least one course of therapy with this drug. As RA worsened, patients were switched to olokizumab against the background of standard DMARDs. At 4, 8, 12 weeks after the switch, the severity of pain was assessed on the VAS scale, the number of painful and swollen joints (TJC28 and TSC28), the level of acute phase markers of inflammation, the DAS28 disease activity index calculated using ESR and CRP, and the CDAI (clinical activity index), functional state index HAQ, as well as assessment of the safety profile of therapy.Results. Data analysis was performed using median values (Me) were used for data analysis. A significant decrease of TJC28 was after the injection of olokizumab (Artlegia®) in 8 and 12 weeks (Me baseline = 10; Me 8 weeks = 4; Me 12 weeks = 4; p<0.05) and a decrease of TSC28 in 4, 8 and 12 weeks (Me baseline = 9; Me 4 weeks = 3.5; Me 8 weeks = 2.5; Me 12 weeks = 2.0; p<0.05). Laboratory markers of inflammation showed a decrease in CRP and ESR levels after 4 weeks of treatment (CRP: Me baseline = 21, Me 4 weeks = 1 (p<0.05); ESR: Me baseline = 31, Me 4 weeks = 7 (p<0.05)). Positive dynamics persisted at 8 and 12 weeks (CRP: Me 8 weeks = 1, Me 12 weeks = 0; ESR: Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 5). The level of CRP by the fourth week 4 became within the normal range, regardless of the initial values. All activity indices improved from the fourth week in each evaluation period compared to baseline: DAS28-ESR: Me baseline = 5.52, Me 4 weeks = 3.59, Me 8 weeks = 3.33, Me 12 weeks = 3.22 (p<0.05); DAS28-CRP: Me baseline = 5.39, Me 4 weeks = 3.71, Me 8 weeks = 3.35, Me 12 weeks = 3.45 (p<0.05); CDAI: Me baseline = 28.5, Me 4 weeks = 18.0, Me 8 weeks = 16.5, Me 12 weeks = 16.0 (p<0.05). All patients showed a reduction in pain (VAS scale) by week 8. The functional status of patients, according to the HAQ index, showed a significant decrease only by the 12th week of the study: Me baseline = 1.62, Me 12 weeks = 1.31 (p<0.05).Conclusion. The study found that switching from rituximab to olokizumab was effective and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":21518,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Science and Practice","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of a 12-week open-label, non-interventional study of the efficacy and safety of olokizumab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after switching from anti-B-cell therapy during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"A. Akimova, N. E. Banshchikova, A. Sizikov, A. A. Mullagaliev, E. Letyagina, N. Ilina, Y. Kurochkina, Y. Ubshaeva, V. Omelchenko, O. Chumasova, N. Shkaruba, M. Korolev\",\"doi\":\"10.47360/1995-4484-2023-25-33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the understanding of the safety profile of therapies for immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). This is primarily due to the negative impact of a number of basic anti-inflammatory drugs (DMARDs) and biological DMARDs on the course and outcomes of a new coronavirus infection. A number of studies have shown that anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) gave a statistically significant increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 and an increase in mortality. At the same time, the analysis of real clinical practice data dictated the need to establish a number of restrictions on the use of certain classes of biological DMARDs and to search for alternative therapy programs to maintain control over disease activity.Purpose of the study – to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug Artlegia® (olokizumab), solution for subcuta neous injection, 160 mg/ml – 0.4 ml, manufactured by R-Pharm JSC, Russia) for the treatment of patients with rheuma toid arthritis in real clinical practice after switching with rituximab during the COVID-19 pandemic.Materials and methods. The study included 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were previously on rituximab therapy at a dose of 1000–500 mg twice with an interval of 2 weeks, who received at least one course of therapy with this drug. As RA worsened, patients were switched to olokizumab against the background of standard DMARDs. At 4, 8, 12 weeks after the switch, the severity of pain was assessed on the VAS scale, the number of painful and swollen joints (TJC28 and TSC28), the level of acute phase markers of inflammation, the DAS28 disease activity index calculated using ESR and CRP, and the CDAI (clinical activity index), functional state index HAQ, as well as assessment of the safety profile of therapy.Results. Data analysis was performed using median values (Me) were used for data analysis. A significant decrease of TJC28 was after the injection of olokizumab (Artlegia®) in 8 and 12 weeks (Me baseline = 10; Me 8 weeks = 4; Me 12 weeks = 4; p<0.05) and a decrease of TSC28 in 4, 8 and 12 weeks (Me baseline = 9; Me 4 weeks = 3.5; Me 8 weeks = 2.5; Me 12 weeks = 2.0; p<0.05). Laboratory markers of inflammation showed a decrease in CRP and ESR levels after 4 weeks of treatment (CRP: Me baseline = 21, Me 4 weeks = 1 (p<0.05); ESR: Me baseline = 31, Me 4 weeks = 7 (p<0.05)). Positive dynamics persisted at 8 and 12 weeks (CRP: Me 8 weeks = 1, Me 12 weeks = 0; ESR: Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 5). The level of CRP by the fourth week 4 became within the normal range, regardless of the initial values. All activity indices improved from the fourth week in each evaluation period compared to baseline: DAS28-ESR: Me baseline = 5.52, Me 4 weeks = 3.59, Me 8 weeks = 3.33, Me 12 weeks = 3.22 (p<0.05); DAS28-CRP: Me baseline = 5.39, Me 4 weeks = 3.71, Me 8 weeks = 3.35, Me 12 weeks = 3.45 (p<0.05); CDAI: Me baseline = 28.5, Me 4 weeks = 18.0, Me 8 weeks = 16.5, Me 12 weeks = 16.0 (p<0.05). All patients showed a reduction in pain (VAS scale) by week 8. The functional status of patients, according to the HAQ index, showed a significant decrease only by the 12th week of the study: Me baseline = 1.62, Me 12 weeks = 1.31 (p<0.05).Conclusion. The study found that switching from rituximab to olokizumab was effective and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2023-25-33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2023-25-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

COVID-19大流行显著改变了对免疫炎症性风湿病(IRDs)疗法安全性的认识。这主要是由于一些基本抗炎药(dmard)和生物dmard对新型冠状病毒感染的过程和结果产生负面影响。多项研究表明,抗b细胞疗法(利妥昔单抗)在统计上显著增加了严重COVID-19的风险和死亡率。与此同时,对真实临床实践数据的分析表明,需要对某些类别的生物dmard的使用建立一些限制,并寻找替代治疗方案,以保持对疾病活动的控制。该研究的目的-评估药物Artlegia®(olokizumab),皮下神经注射溶液,160 mg/ml - 0.4 ml,由R-Pharm JSC,俄罗斯生产)在实际临床实践中治疗类风湿性关节炎患者在COVID-19大流行期间改用利妥昔单抗后的疗效和安全性。材料和方法。该研究纳入了14例确诊为类风湿性关节炎(RA)的患者,这些患者先前接受了利妥昔单抗治疗,剂量为1000 - 500mg,两次,间隔2周,接受了该药物至少一个疗程的治疗。随着RA的恶化,患者在标准dmard的背景下切换到olokizumab。在转换后的4、8、12周,通过VAS评分评估疼痛的严重程度,疼痛和肿胀关节(TJC28和TSC28)的数量,炎症急性期标志物的水平,用ESR和CRP计算DAS28疾病活动指数,CDAI(临床活动指数),功能状态指数HAQ,以及评估治疗的安全性。数据分析采用中位数(Me)进行。在8周和12周注射olokizumab (Artlegia®)后,TJC28显著降低(Me基线= 10;8周= 4周;12周= 4周;p<0.05), 4周、8周和12周TSC28降低(Me基线= 9;4周= 3.5;8周= 2.5周;Me 12周= 2.0;p < 0.05)。试验室炎症指标显示,治疗4周后CRP和ESR水平下降(CRP: Me基线= 21,Me 4周= 1,p<0.05);ESR: Me基线= 31,Me 4周= 7 (p<0.05)。积极动态持续到8周和12周(CRP: Me 8周= 1,Me 12周= 0;ESR: me8周= 4,me12周= 5)。到第4周,无论初始值如何,CRP水平均在正常范围内。各评估期的各项活动指标从第4周开始均较基线有所改善:DAS28-ESR: Me基线= 5.52,Me 4周= 3.59,Me 8周= 3.33,Me 12周= 3.22 (p<0.05);DAS28-CRP: Me基线= 5.39,Me 4周= 3.71,Me 8周= 3.35,Me 12周= 3.45 (p<0.05);CDAI: Me基线= 28.5,Me 4周= 18.0,Me 8周= 16.5,Me 12周= 16.0 (p<0.05)。所有患者在第8周均表现出疼痛减轻(VAS评分)。根据HAQ指数,患者的功能状态仅在研究第12周时出现显著下降:Me基线= 1.62,Me 12周= 1.31 (p<0.05)。该研究发现,在COVID-19大流行期间,从利妥昔单抗转向olokizumab是有效和安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of a 12-week open-label, non-interventional study of the efficacy and safety of olokizumab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after switching from anti-B-cell therapy during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the understanding of the safety profile of therapies for immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). This is primarily due to the negative impact of a number of basic anti-inflammatory drugs (DMARDs) and biological DMARDs on the course and outcomes of a new coronavirus infection. A number of studies have shown that anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) gave a statistically significant increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 and an increase in mortality. At the same time, the analysis of real clinical practice data dictated the need to establish a number of restrictions on the use of certain classes of biological DMARDs and to search for alternative therapy programs to maintain control over disease activity.Purpose of the study – to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug Artlegia® (olokizumab), solution for subcuta neous injection, 160 mg/ml – 0.4 ml, manufactured by R-Pharm JSC, Russia) for the treatment of patients with rheuma toid arthritis in real clinical practice after switching with rituximab during the COVID-19 pandemic.Materials and methods. The study included 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were previously on rituximab therapy at a dose of 1000–500 mg twice with an interval of 2 weeks, who received at least one course of therapy with this drug. As RA worsened, patients were switched to olokizumab against the background of standard DMARDs. At 4, 8, 12 weeks after the switch, the severity of pain was assessed on the VAS scale, the number of painful and swollen joints (TJC28 and TSC28), the level of acute phase markers of inflammation, the DAS28 disease activity index calculated using ESR and CRP, and the CDAI (clinical activity index), functional state index HAQ, as well as assessment of the safety profile of therapy.Results. Data analysis was performed using median values (Me) were used for data analysis. A significant decrease of TJC28 was after the injection of olokizumab (Artlegia®) in 8 and 12 weeks (Me baseline = 10; Me 8 weeks = 4; Me 12 weeks = 4; p<0.05) and a decrease of TSC28 in 4, 8 and 12 weeks (Me baseline = 9; Me 4 weeks = 3.5; Me 8 weeks = 2.5; Me 12 weeks = 2.0; p<0.05). Laboratory markers of inflammation showed a decrease in CRP and ESR levels after 4 weeks of treatment (CRP: Me baseline = 21, Me 4 weeks = 1 (p<0.05); ESR: Me baseline = 31, Me 4 weeks = 7 (p<0.05)). Positive dynamics persisted at 8 and 12 weeks (CRP: Me 8 weeks = 1, Me 12 weeks = 0; ESR: Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 5). The level of CRP by the fourth week 4 became within the normal range, regardless of the initial values. All activity indices improved from the fourth week in each evaluation period compared to baseline: DAS28-ESR: Me baseline = 5.52, Me 4 weeks = 3.59, Me 8 weeks = 3.33, Me 12 weeks = 3.22 (p<0.05); DAS28-CRP: Me baseline = 5.39, Me 4 weeks = 3.71, Me 8 weeks = 3.35, Me 12 weeks = 3.45 (p<0.05); CDAI: Me baseline = 28.5, Me 4 weeks = 18.0, Me 8 weeks = 16.5, Me 12 weeks = 16.0 (p<0.05). All patients showed a reduction in pain (VAS scale) by week 8. The functional status of patients, according to the HAQ index, showed a significant decrease only by the 12th week of the study: Me baseline = 1.62, Me 12 weeks = 1.31 (p<0.05).Conclusion. The study found that switching from rituximab to olokizumab was effective and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信