一种合并多个静态分析工具结果的方法(短文)

Na Meng, Qianxiang Wang, Qian Wu, Hong Mei
{"title":"一种合并多个静态分析工具结果的方法(短文)","authors":"Na Meng, Qianxiang Wang, Qian Wu, Hong Mei","doi":"10.1109/QSIC.2008.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defects have been compromising quality of software and costing a lot to find and fix. Thus a number of effective tools have been built to automatically find defects by analyzing code statically. These tools apply various techniques and detect a wide range of defects, with a little overlap among defect libraries. Unfortunately, the advantages of tools' defect detection capacity are stubborn to combine, due to the unique style each tool follows when generating analysis reports. In this paper, we propose an approach to merge results from different tools and report them in a universal manner. Besides, two prioritizing policies are introduced to rank results so as to raise users' efficiency. Finally, the approach and prioritizing policies are implemented in an integrated tool by merging results from three independent analyzing tools. In this way, end users may comfortably benefit from more than one static analysis tool and thus improve software's quality.","PeriodicalId":6446,"journal":{"name":"2008 The Eighth International Conference on Quality Software","volume":"7 1","pages":"169-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Approach to Merge Results of Multiple Static Analysis Tools (Short Paper)\",\"authors\":\"Na Meng, Qianxiang Wang, Qian Wu, Hong Mei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QSIC.2008.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defects have been compromising quality of software and costing a lot to find and fix. Thus a number of effective tools have been built to automatically find defects by analyzing code statically. These tools apply various techniques and detect a wide range of defects, with a little overlap among defect libraries. Unfortunately, the advantages of tools' defect detection capacity are stubborn to combine, due to the unique style each tool follows when generating analysis reports. In this paper, we propose an approach to merge results from different tools and report them in a universal manner. Besides, two prioritizing policies are introduced to rank results so as to raise users' efficiency. Finally, the approach and prioritizing policies are implemented in an integrated tool by merging results from three independent analyzing tools. In this way, end users may comfortably benefit from more than one static analysis tool and thus improve software's quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 The Eighth International Conference on Quality Software\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"169-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 The Eighth International Conference on Quality Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2008.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 The Eighth International Conference on Quality Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2008.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

缺陷已经损害了软件的质量,并且需要花费大量的时间来发现和修复。因此,已经构建了许多有效的工具,通过静态分析代码来自动发现缺陷。这些工具应用各种各样的技术并检测范围广泛的缺陷,缺陷库之间有一点重叠。不幸的是,由于每种工具在生成分析报告时遵循的独特风格,工具缺陷检测能力的优势很难结合起来。在本文中,我们提出了一种方法来合并来自不同工具的结果,并以一种通用的方式报告它们。此外,还引入了两种排序策略对搜索结果进行排序,以提高用户效率。最后,通过合并三个独立分析工具的结果,在一个集成工具中实现了该方法和优先级策略。通过这种方式,最终用户可以轻松地从多个静态分析工具中获益,从而提高软件的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Approach to Merge Results of Multiple Static Analysis Tools (Short Paper)
Defects have been compromising quality of software and costing a lot to find and fix. Thus a number of effective tools have been built to automatically find defects by analyzing code statically. These tools apply various techniques and detect a wide range of defects, with a little overlap among defect libraries. Unfortunately, the advantages of tools' defect detection capacity are stubborn to combine, due to the unique style each tool follows when generating analysis reports. In this paper, we propose an approach to merge results from different tools and report them in a universal manner. Besides, two prioritizing policies are introduced to rank results so as to raise users' efficiency. Finally, the approach and prioritizing policies are implemented in an integrated tool by merging results from three independent analyzing tools. In this way, end users may comfortably benefit from more than one static analysis tool and thus improve software's quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信