事件与伦理之间的历史创伤:阿莱达·阿斯曼在创伤研究中的理论

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE
Kseniya Kapelchuk
{"title":"事件与伦理之间的历史创伤:阿莱达·阿斯曼在创伤研究中的理论","authors":"Kseniya Kapelchuk","doi":"10.7592/fejf2021.83.kapelchuk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper focuses on the way the notion of trauma functions and is justified in the contemporary discourse on history. The author refers to the works of Aleida Assmann and examines the critique brought forward against memorial culture. Deconstructing Assmann’s argument, the author concludes that there are two levels of discourse that support and justify each other: the level of fact and the level of value. The first one deals with the problem of traumatic events and expanding memory about them, which is explained as a change of time regime. The second one deals with the ethical turn that made the change of the time regime possible. To analyse historical trauma, the article suggests breaking the connection between these two levels and examining their foundations separately.","PeriodicalId":42641,"journal":{"name":"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Trauma between Event and Ethics: Aleida Assmann’s Theory in the Context of Trauma Studies\",\"authors\":\"Kseniya Kapelchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.7592/fejf2021.83.kapelchuk\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper focuses on the way the notion of trauma functions and is justified in the contemporary discourse on history. The author refers to the works of Aleida Assmann and examines the critique brought forward against memorial culture. Deconstructing Assmann’s argument, the author concludes that there are two levels of discourse that support and justify each other: the level of fact and the level of value. The first one deals with the problem of traumatic events and expanding memory about them, which is explained as a change of time regime. The second one deals with the ethical turn that made the change of the time regime possible. To analyse historical trauma, the article suggests breaking the connection between these two levels and examining their foundations separately.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7592/fejf2021.83.kapelchuk\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FOLKLORE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7592/fejf2021.83.kapelchuk","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文关注创伤概念的作用方式,并在当代历史话语中证明其合理性。作者参考阿莱达·阿斯曼的作品,对其对纪念文化的批判进行了考察。通过解构阿斯曼的论点,作者得出结论,话语有两个层次,它们相互支持和证明:事实层次和价值层次。第一个是关于创伤性事件和扩展记忆的问题,这被解释为时间制度的改变。第二部分论述了使时间制度的改变成为可能的伦理转向。为了分析历史创伤,本文建议打破这两个层次之间的联系,分别考察它们的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historical Trauma between Event and Ethics: Aleida Assmann’s Theory in the Context of Trauma Studies
The paper focuses on the way the notion of trauma functions and is justified in the contemporary discourse on history. The author refers to the works of Aleida Assmann and examines the critique brought forward against memorial culture. Deconstructing Assmann’s argument, the author concludes that there are two levels of discourse that support and justify each other: the level of fact and the level of value. The first one deals with the problem of traumatic events and expanding memory about them, which is explained as a change of time regime. The second one deals with the ethical turn that made the change of the time regime possible. To analyse historical trauma, the article suggests breaking the connection between these two levels and examining their foundations separately.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信