PCA和LDA在SAR ATR中的应用验证

A. Mishra
{"title":"PCA和LDA在SAR ATR中的应用验证","authors":"A. Mishra","doi":"10.1109/TENCON.2008.4766807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) have long been recognized as tools for feature extraction and data analysis. There has been reports in the open literature regarding the performance of both LDA and PCA as feature extractors in various types of classification and recognition problems. Many of the reports claim a better performance with LDA than with PCA. However, the grounds of comparison have mostly been quite narrow. In the current paper PCA and LDA based classifiers are evaluated for the problem of synthetic aperture radar based automatic target recognition problem. The results show that in terms of absolute performance, PCA outperforms LDA. Results of PCA based classifier are also found to be of higher confidence than those from LDA based classifiers, as observed from the error-bar analysis of the classifiers.With decreased amount of training dataset, the degradation in the performance of the classifiers are almost similar in nature. The current work concludes that LDA is not suitable for radar image based target recognition task. This is in line with reports from some works in the open literature which claim that the success of LDA will depend on the type of data and whether there is exhaustive data available during the training phase or not.","PeriodicalId":22230,"journal":{"name":"TENCON 2008 - 2008 IEEE Region 10 Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"110","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of PCA and LDA for SAR ATR\",\"authors\":\"A. Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TENCON.2008.4766807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Both principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) have long been recognized as tools for feature extraction and data analysis. There has been reports in the open literature regarding the performance of both LDA and PCA as feature extractors in various types of classification and recognition problems. Many of the reports claim a better performance with LDA than with PCA. However, the grounds of comparison have mostly been quite narrow. In the current paper PCA and LDA based classifiers are evaluated for the problem of synthetic aperture radar based automatic target recognition problem. The results show that in terms of absolute performance, PCA outperforms LDA. Results of PCA based classifier are also found to be of higher confidence than those from LDA based classifiers, as observed from the error-bar analysis of the classifiers.With decreased amount of training dataset, the degradation in the performance of the classifiers are almost similar in nature. The current work concludes that LDA is not suitable for radar image based target recognition task. This is in line with reports from some works in the open literature which claim that the success of LDA will depend on the type of data and whether there is exhaustive data available during the training phase or not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TENCON 2008 - 2008 IEEE Region 10 Conference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"110\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TENCON 2008 - 2008 IEEE Region 10 Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2008.4766807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TENCON 2008 - 2008 IEEE Region 10 Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2008.4766807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 110

摘要

主成分分析(PCA)和线性判别分析(LDA)一直被认为是特征提取和数据分析的工具。在公开文献中已经有关于LDA和PCA作为特征提取器在各种类型的分类和识别问题中的性能的报道。许多报告声称LDA比PCA有更好的性能。然而,比较的依据大多相当狭隘。针对基于合成孔径雷达的目标自动识别问题,本文对基于PCA和LDA的分类器进行了评价。结果表明,在绝对性能方面,PCA优于LDA。从分类器的误差条分析中可以看出,基于PCA的分类器的结果也比基于LDA的分类器的结果具有更高的置信度。随着训练数据集数量的减少,分类器性能的下降在本质上几乎是相似的。目前的研究表明,LDA算法并不适用于基于雷达图像的目标识别任务。这与公开文献中的一些工作报告一致,这些报告声称LDA的成功将取决于数据的类型以及在训练阶段是否有详尽的数据可用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of PCA and LDA for SAR ATR
Both principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) have long been recognized as tools for feature extraction and data analysis. There has been reports in the open literature regarding the performance of both LDA and PCA as feature extractors in various types of classification and recognition problems. Many of the reports claim a better performance with LDA than with PCA. However, the grounds of comparison have mostly been quite narrow. In the current paper PCA and LDA based classifiers are evaluated for the problem of synthetic aperture radar based automatic target recognition problem. The results show that in terms of absolute performance, PCA outperforms LDA. Results of PCA based classifier are also found to be of higher confidence than those from LDA based classifiers, as observed from the error-bar analysis of the classifiers.With decreased amount of training dataset, the degradation in the performance of the classifiers are almost similar in nature. The current work concludes that LDA is not suitable for radar image based target recognition task. This is in line with reports from some works in the open literature which claim that the success of LDA will depend on the type of data and whether there is exhaustive data available during the training phase or not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信