从冷战到科索沃战争

IF 0.1 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Vladimir Unkovski-Korica
{"title":"从冷战到科索沃战争","authors":"Vladimir Unkovski-Korica","doi":"10.3917/RECEO1.501.0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper traces the different approaches to foreign policy in the British Labour Party through the prism of its long-term relationship with Yugoslavia. It goes beyond caricatures of Labour and British policy as merely status quo powers in the Balkans. Relying on Yugoslav archival records, as well as secondary sources and the British press, the paper shows that Atlanticism was the dominant approach in the Labour Party from the early Cold War to the reconfiguration of international relations following the end of the Cold War. The roots of this orientation are traced to the dual class nature of the Labour Party as both a ruling class and working class party, which tied it ultimately to the geopolitical interests of the British state, but also created pressures towards a socialist foreign policy. That allowed Yugoslavia to rely on the Labour Party as a special interlocutor in the Western hemisphere in times of cooler relations with the USSR, but also as a potential ally in the country’s struggle to maintain foreign policy independence, despite economic dependence on the West. Nonetheless, the end of the Cold War changed priorities in Labour, with the Atlanticist wing quickly adopting a pro-interventionist line in Yugoslavia, following the US lead. The Left, previously distrusted in Yugoslavia because of its softness on the USSR, became the champion of anti-interventionist arguments. Both sides had had direct links with and experiences of Yugoslavia, but this paper argues it was domestic class interpretation of international affairs which determined post-Cold War alignments.","PeriodicalId":42660,"journal":{"name":"Revue D Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the Cold War to the Kosovo War\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Unkovski-Korica\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/RECEO1.501.0115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper traces the different approaches to foreign policy in the British Labour Party through the prism of its long-term relationship with Yugoslavia. It goes beyond caricatures of Labour and British policy as merely status quo powers in the Balkans. Relying on Yugoslav archival records, as well as secondary sources and the British press, the paper shows that Atlanticism was the dominant approach in the Labour Party from the early Cold War to the reconfiguration of international relations following the end of the Cold War. The roots of this orientation are traced to the dual class nature of the Labour Party as both a ruling class and working class party, which tied it ultimately to the geopolitical interests of the British state, but also created pressures towards a socialist foreign policy. That allowed Yugoslavia to rely on the Labour Party as a special interlocutor in the Western hemisphere in times of cooler relations with the USSR, but also as a potential ally in the country’s struggle to maintain foreign policy independence, despite economic dependence on the West. Nonetheless, the end of the Cold War changed priorities in Labour, with the Atlanticist wing quickly adopting a pro-interventionist line in Yugoslavia, following the US lead. The Left, previously distrusted in Yugoslavia because of its softness on the USSR, became the champion of anti-interventionist arguments. Both sides had had direct links with and experiences of Yugoslavia, but this paper argues it was domestic class interpretation of international affairs which determined post-Cold War alignments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue D Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue D Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/RECEO1.501.0115\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue D Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/RECEO1.501.0115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过英国工党与南斯拉夫的长期关系,追溯了英国工党在外交政策上的不同做法。它超越了把工党和英国的政策讽刺为仅仅维持巴尔干地区现状的权力。本文以南斯拉夫的档案记录、二手资料和英国媒体为依据,表明大西洋主义在冷战初期到冷战结束后国际关系重构期间是工党的主导立场。这种取向的根源可以追溯到工党作为统治阶级和工人阶级政党的双重阶级性质,这最终将其与英国国家的地缘政治利益联系在一起,但也创造了社会主义外交政策的压力。这使得南斯拉夫在与苏联关系变冷的时候,可以依靠工党作为西半球的特别对话者,但在该国努力保持外交政策独立的过程中,尽管在经济上依赖西方,工党也是一个潜在的盟友。尽管如此,冷战的结束改变了工党的优先事项,大西洋派追随美国的脚步,在南斯拉夫问题上迅速采取了支持干涉主义的路线。由于对苏联态度软弱,左派先前在南斯拉夫不被信任,现在却成了反干涉主义的拥护者。双方都与南斯拉夫有直接的联系和经历,但本文认为是国内阶级对国际事务的解释决定了冷战后的联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From the Cold War to the Kosovo War
This paper traces the different approaches to foreign policy in the British Labour Party through the prism of its long-term relationship with Yugoslavia. It goes beyond caricatures of Labour and British policy as merely status quo powers in the Balkans. Relying on Yugoslav archival records, as well as secondary sources and the British press, the paper shows that Atlanticism was the dominant approach in the Labour Party from the early Cold War to the reconfiguration of international relations following the end of the Cold War. The roots of this orientation are traced to the dual class nature of the Labour Party as both a ruling class and working class party, which tied it ultimately to the geopolitical interests of the British state, but also created pressures towards a socialist foreign policy. That allowed Yugoslavia to rely on the Labour Party as a special interlocutor in the Western hemisphere in times of cooler relations with the USSR, but also as a potential ally in the country’s struggle to maintain foreign policy independence, despite economic dependence on the West. Nonetheless, the end of the Cold War changed priorities in Labour, with the Atlanticist wing quickly adopting a pro-interventionist line in Yugoslavia, following the US lead. The Left, previously distrusted in Yugoslavia because of its softness on the USSR, became the champion of anti-interventionist arguments. Both sides had had direct links with and experiences of Yugoslavia, but this paper argues it was domestic class interpretation of international affairs which determined post-Cold War alignments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: La Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest (RECEO), créée en 1970 par le CNRS, publie des travaux originaux de recherche portant sur le champ géographique européen et eurasiatique. Résolument comparative et pluridisciplinaire, elle accueille des articles relevant des diverses disciplines des sciences sociales (économie, sociologie, histoire contemporaine, droit, science politique, géographie…). La RECEO privilégie les articles proposant des approches conceptuelles et explicatives, des contributions au débat théorique et accueille les recherches empiriques qui rendent compte de la pluralité des espaces nationaux. Elle favorise la confrontation des idées, les échanges scientifiques et la coopération entre les chercheurs des différentes disciplines des sciences sociales et des différentes aires couvertes par la revue. Elle publie des articles en français et en anglais. Revue à comité de lecture, elle est indexée au niveau international.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信