{"title":"视觉,文字和墙壁:感性学习和克曼·瓦·勒胡勒尔的艺术作品","authors":"R. Salley","doi":"10.1080/21681392.2021.1884107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is not easy to define where, for Kemang Wa Lehulere, the making of art begins and ends. Wa Lehulere’s artworks suggest an attitude toward looking focused on less developed aspects in contemporary art criticism and art history. The artworks perform this task by insisting on the attention and involvement of the viewer in ways that make artistic production and viewer reception a potently intertwined and productive place of attention. This article argues that Wa Lehulere’s creative practice reflects contested and changing ideas of visual cultural knowledge in South Africa. My personal encounters with Wa Lehulere’s artwork over the years, through direct engagements at exhibitions, in talking about reference images, sketches, and unfinished object assemblages in the artist’s studio, and in moments of reflection on the artist’s own way of describing their practice, have informed my ideas about creative practices loosely described as ‘conceptual art’ in the space of South Africa. The contestations and changes that I see through these visual gestures are seen to organically expand into the vicissitudes of cultural, social, and political dynamics. Wa Lehulere’s artwork as an analytic device changes the viewer’s long-term perception (of learning) and, in this context, delivers a form of perceptual learning oriented toward decolonial education. It permits a choreography of and for future narratives. As such, Wa Lehulere’s performances, drawings, photographs, and texts function as forms of sense-making for other sights. Such visual and theoretical activities of critical conceptual art are produced by and effectively inform changing definitions of art, care ethics, and freedom in periods of transformation wherein such cultural phenomena become crucial to liberatory practices.","PeriodicalId":37966,"journal":{"name":"Critical African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visions, writings and walls: perceptual learning and the artwork of Kemang Wa Lehulere\",\"authors\":\"R. Salley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21681392.2021.1884107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is not easy to define where, for Kemang Wa Lehulere, the making of art begins and ends. Wa Lehulere’s artworks suggest an attitude toward looking focused on less developed aspects in contemporary art criticism and art history. The artworks perform this task by insisting on the attention and involvement of the viewer in ways that make artistic production and viewer reception a potently intertwined and productive place of attention. This article argues that Wa Lehulere’s creative practice reflects contested and changing ideas of visual cultural knowledge in South Africa. My personal encounters with Wa Lehulere’s artwork over the years, through direct engagements at exhibitions, in talking about reference images, sketches, and unfinished object assemblages in the artist’s studio, and in moments of reflection on the artist’s own way of describing their practice, have informed my ideas about creative practices loosely described as ‘conceptual art’ in the space of South Africa. The contestations and changes that I see through these visual gestures are seen to organically expand into the vicissitudes of cultural, social, and political dynamics. Wa Lehulere’s artwork as an analytic device changes the viewer’s long-term perception (of learning) and, in this context, delivers a form of perceptual learning oriented toward decolonial education. It permits a choreography of and for future narratives. As such, Wa Lehulere’s performances, drawings, photographs, and texts function as forms of sense-making for other sights. Such visual and theoretical activities of critical conceptual art are produced by and effectively inform changing definitions of art, care ethics, and freedom in periods of transformation wherein such cultural phenomena become crucial to liberatory practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical African Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2021.1884107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2021.1884107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对于Kemang Wa Lehulere来说,定义艺术创作的起点和终点并不容易。瓦·勒胡勒尔的作品表明了一种关注当代艺术批评和艺术史中欠发达方面的态度。艺术作品通过坚持观众的注意力和参与来完成这一任务,使艺术生产和观众接受成为一个潜在的相互交织和富有成效的关注场所。本文认为,瓦·勒胡勒尔的创作实践反映了南非视觉文化知识观念的争议和变化。多年来,我与Wa Lehulere的艺术作品的接触,通过直接参与展览,在艺术家的工作室里谈论参考图像,草图和未完成的物体组合,以及在艺术家自己描述他们实践的方式的反思时刻,告诉了我关于南非空间中被松散地称为“观念艺术”的创造性实践的想法。我通过这些视觉姿态看到的争论和变化被视为有机地扩展到文化、社会和政治动态的变迁中。Wa Lehulere的艺术作品作为一种分析工具,改变了观众的长期感知(学习),并在此背景下提供了一种面向非殖民化教育的感知学习形式。它允许对未来的叙述进行编排。因此,Wa Lehulere的表演、绘画、照片和文本都是为其他景点创造意义的形式。这种批判性观念艺术的视觉和理论活动是由转型时期对艺术、关怀伦理和自由的不断变化的定义产生的,在转型时期,这种文化现象对解放实践至关重要。
Visions, writings and walls: perceptual learning and the artwork of Kemang Wa Lehulere
It is not easy to define where, for Kemang Wa Lehulere, the making of art begins and ends. Wa Lehulere’s artworks suggest an attitude toward looking focused on less developed aspects in contemporary art criticism and art history. The artworks perform this task by insisting on the attention and involvement of the viewer in ways that make artistic production and viewer reception a potently intertwined and productive place of attention. This article argues that Wa Lehulere’s creative practice reflects contested and changing ideas of visual cultural knowledge in South Africa. My personal encounters with Wa Lehulere’s artwork over the years, through direct engagements at exhibitions, in talking about reference images, sketches, and unfinished object assemblages in the artist’s studio, and in moments of reflection on the artist’s own way of describing their practice, have informed my ideas about creative practices loosely described as ‘conceptual art’ in the space of South Africa. The contestations and changes that I see through these visual gestures are seen to organically expand into the vicissitudes of cultural, social, and political dynamics. Wa Lehulere’s artwork as an analytic device changes the viewer’s long-term perception (of learning) and, in this context, delivers a form of perceptual learning oriented toward decolonial education. It permits a choreography of and for future narratives. As such, Wa Lehulere’s performances, drawings, photographs, and texts function as forms of sense-making for other sights. Such visual and theoretical activities of critical conceptual art are produced by and effectively inform changing definitions of art, care ethics, and freedom in periods of transformation wherein such cultural phenomena become crucial to liberatory practices.
期刊介绍:
Critical African Studies seeks to return Africanist scholarship to the heart of theoretical innovation within each of its constituent disciplines, including Anthropology, Political Science, Sociology, History, Law and Economics. We offer authors a more flexible publishing platform than other journals, allowing them greater space to develop empirical discussions alongside theoretical and conceptual engagements. We aim to publish scholarly articles that offer both innovative empirical contributions, grounded in original fieldwork, and also innovative theoretical engagements. This speaks to our broader intention to promote the deployment of thorough empirical work for the purposes of sophisticated theoretical innovation. We invite contributions that meet the aims of the journal, including special issue proposals that offer fresh empirical and theoretical insights into African Studies debates.