新培训的认证同伴专家在补充每周小组监督后的康复和自我效能:基于案例的时间序列分析

Kim Weikel, A. Tomer, Lynn Davis, R. Sieke
{"title":"新培训的认证同伴专家在补充每周小组监督后的康复和自我效能:基于案例的时间序列分析","authors":"Kim Weikel, A. Tomer, Lynn Davis, R. Sieke","doi":"10.1080/15487768.2016.1267051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This single-case time-series study explored the benefits of adding a supervision/support group for peer specialists. Six certified peer specialists, employed by a small community-based peer support program, provided weekly recordings of mental health recovery (as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale) and peer specialist self-efficacy (measured with an inventory developed by the authors) during an 8-week baseline phase and a 28-week intervention (weekly supervision group) phase. Data from the peer specialist with the most consistent supervision group attendance and greatest number of weekly recordings were chosen for intensive analysis using Simulation Modeling Analysis for Brief Time-Series Data Streams. Results indicated that the peer specialist experienced significant increases in recovery and work-related self-efficacy during the group supervision phase. There was also a statistically significant association between her improvements in mental health recovery and her increases in peer specialist self-efficacy. In addition, her improvement in recovery seemed to occur with or to precede changes in self-efficacy, a finding that, though opposite the hypothesized direction, is consistent with the importance of a peer specialist’s own recovery to his or her peer support work. The authors recommend viewing peer support programming as a two-tiered service, with mental health program administrators considering not only the support offered to consumers but also the support that can be offered to the peer specialists they employ.","PeriodicalId":72174,"journal":{"name":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","volume":"9 1","pages":"1 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovery and self-efficacy of a newly trained certified peer specialist following supplemental weekly group supervision: A case-based time-series analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kim Weikel, A. Tomer, Lynn Davis, R. Sieke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15487768.2016.1267051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This single-case time-series study explored the benefits of adding a supervision/support group for peer specialists. Six certified peer specialists, employed by a small community-based peer support program, provided weekly recordings of mental health recovery (as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale) and peer specialist self-efficacy (measured with an inventory developed by the authors) during an 8-week baseline phase and a 28-week intervention (weekly supervision group) phase. Data from the peer specialist with the most consistent supervision group attendance and greatest number of weekly recordings were chosen for intensive analysis using Simulation Modeling Analysis for Brief Time-Series Data Streams. Results indicated that the peer specialist experienced significant increases in recovery and work-related self-efficacy during the group supervision phase. There was also a statistically significant association between her improvements in mental health recovery and her increases in peer specialist self-efficacy. In addition, her improvement in recovery seemed to occur with or to precede changes in self-efficacy, a finding that, though opposite the hypothesized direction, is consistent with the importance of a peer specialist’s own recovery to his or her peer support work. The authors recommend viewing peer support programming as a two-tiered service, with mental health program administrators considering not only the support offered to consumers but also the support that can be offered to the peer specialists they employ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2016.1267051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2016.1267051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本单例时间序列研究探讨了为同行专家增加监督/支持小组的好处。在为期8周的基线阶段和为期28周的干预(每周监督组)阶段,由一个小型社区同伴支持项目雇用的6名经过认证的同伴专家每周提供心理健康恢复(用恢复评估量表测量)和同伴专家自我效能(用作者开发的清单测量)的记录。选择具有最一致的监督小组出勤率和最多每周记录的同行专家的数据,使用模拟建模分析进行简短时间序列数据流的深入分析。结果表明,在小组监督阶段,同伴专家在康复和工作相关自我效能感方面有显著的提高。她在心理健康恢复方面的改善与她在同伴专家自我效能感方面的提高之间也存在统计学上的显著关联。此外,她在康复方面的改善似乎伴随着或先于自我效能感的改变,这一发现虽然与假设的方向相反,但与同伴专家自身康复对同伴支持工作的重要性是一致的。作者建议将同伴支持项目视为一种双层服务,心理健康项目管理者不仅要考虑向消费者提供的支持,还要考虑向他们雇用的同伴专家提供的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recovery and self-efficacy of a newly trained certified peer specialist following supplemental weekly group supervision: A case-based time-series analysis
ABSTRACT This single-case time-series study explored the benefits of adding a supervision/support group for peer specialists. Six certified peer specialists, employed by a small community-based peer support program, provided weekly recordings of mental health recovery (as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale) and peer specialist self-efficacy (measured with an inventory developed by the authors) during an 8-week baseline phase and a 28-week intervention (weekly supervision group) phase. Data from the peer specialist with the most consistent supervision group attendance and greatest number of weekly recordings were chosen for intensive analysis using Simulation Modeling Analysis for Brief Time-Series Data Streams. Results indicated that the peer specialist experienced significant increases in recovery and work-related self-efficacy during the group supervision phase. There was also a statistically significant association between her improvements in mental health recovery and her increases in peer specialist self-efficacy. In addition, her improvement in recovery seemed to occur with or to precede changes in self-efficacy, a finding that, though opposite the hypothesized direction, is consistent with the importance of a peer specialist’s own recovery to his or her peer support work. The authors recommend viewing peer support programming as a two-tiered service, with mental health program administrators considering not only the support offered to consumers but also the support that can be offered to the peer specialists they employ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信