基于沙迦大学大学生视角的新冠肺炎疫情电子评估

B. Saeed, N. Alsalhi, S. Guraya, Sami Sulieman Al Qatawneh, M. Eltahir, A. Adrees, K. S. Fahady, Nagaletchimee Annamalai
{"title":"基于沙迦大学大学生视角的新冠肺炎疫情电子评估","authors":"B. Saeed, N. Alsalhi, S. Guraya, Sami Sulieman Al Qatawneh, M. Eltahir, A. Adrees, K. S. Fahady, Nagaletchimee Annamalai","doi":"10.3991/ijim.v17i13.41515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— The aim of the current research was to detect how undergraduates from the faculties of medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, and health sciences felt about using electronic assessment at the time of COVID-19. Cross-sectional research was made at the University of Sharjah in UAE between January and April 2021. As a study tool, a questionnaire with 26 items was created using Google Forms and disseminated by the registration department via the learner's E-learning platforms. The study's data were analyzed using SPSS software. The outcomes demonstrated that students had a high level of acceptance of the computerized assessment. The overall arithmetic mean of the students' replies was (3.49) and had a standard deviation of (1.33), indicating that they accepted the electronic assessment to a high degree. Furthermore, there was a discernible difference between the acceptance of the internet-based assessment by male and female students, but the College of Medicine (COM) students benefited significantly from the variation in acceptance of the assessment depending on the variable of college. Students who had inadequate computer capacities, on the other hand, were more receptive to electronic testing. The study's findings may be helpful in developing academic methods, rearranging assessment alternatives, and changing the academic curriculum to address the problems and limitations of electronic assessment.","PeriodicalId":13648,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.","volume":"1 1","pages":"79-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-assessment during the Coronavirus Outbreak from the Perspective of Undergraduate at the University of Sharjah, UAE\",\"authors\":\"B. Saeed, N. Alsalhi, S. Guraya, Sami Sulieman Al Qatawneh, M. Eltahir, A. Adrees, K. S. Fahady, Nagaletchimee Annamalai\",\"doi\":\"10.3991/ijim.v17i13.41515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"— The aim of the current research was to detect how undergraduates from the faculties of medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, and health sciences felt about using electronic assessment at the time of COVID-19. Cross-sectional research was made at the University of Sharjah in UAE between January and April 2021. As a study tool, a questionnaire with 26 items was created using Google Forms and disseminated by the registration department via the learner's E-learning platforms. The study's data were analyzed using SPSS software. The outcomes demonstrated that students had a high level of acceptance of the computerized assessment. The overall arithmetic mean of the students' replies was (3.49) and had a standard deviation of (1.33), indicating that they accepted the electronic assessment to a high degree. Furthermore, there was a discernible difference between the acceptance of the internet-based assessment by male and female students, but the College of Medicine (COM) students benefited significantly from the variation in acceptance of the assessment depending on the variable of college. Students who had inadequate computer capacities, on the other hand, were more receptive to electronic testing. The study's findings may be helpful in developing academic methods, rearranging assessment alternatives, and changing the academic curriculum to address the problems and limitations of electronic assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"79-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i13.41515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i13.41515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前研究的目的是检测医学、牙科、药学和健康科学学院的本科生在COVID-19期间使用电子评估的感受。横断面研究于2021年1月至4月在阿联酋沙迦大学进行。作为学习工具,我们使用Google Forms制作了一份包含26个项目的调查问卷,并由注册部门通过学习者的E-learning平台进行分发。本研究数据采用SPSS软件进行分析。结果表明,学生对计算机化评估的接受程度很高。学生回答的总体算术平均值为(3.49),标准差为(1.33),表明学生对电子评估的接受程度较高。此外,男女学生对基于网络的评估的接受程度存在明显差异,但医学院(COM)学生对评估的接受程度随学院变量的变化而显著受益。另一方面,电脑能力不足的学生更容易接受电子测试。本研究的发现可能有助于发展学术方法,重新安排评估方案,改变学术课程,以解决电子评估的问题和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
E-assessment during the Coronavirus Outbreak from the Perspective of Undergraduate at the University of Sharjah, UAE
— The aim of the current research was to detect how undergraduates from the faculties of medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, and health sciences felt about using electronic assessment at the time of COVID-19. Cross-sectional research was made at the University of Sharjah in UAE between January and April 2021. As a study tool, a questionnaire with 26 items was created using Google Forms and disseminated by the registration department via the learner's E-learning platforms. The study's data were analyzed using SPSS software. The outcomes demonstrated that students had a high level of acceptance of the computerized assessment. The overall arithmetic mean of the students' replies was (3.49) and had a standard deviation of (1.33), indicating that they accepted the electronic assessment to a high degree. Furthermore, there was a discernible difference between the acceptance of the internet-based assessment by male and female students, but the College of Medicine (COM) students benefited significantly from the variation in acceptance of the assessment depending on the variable of college. Students who had inadequate computer capacities, on the other hand, were more receptive to electronic testing. The study's findings may be helpful in developing academic methods, rearranging assessment alternatives, and changing the academic curriculum to address the problems and limitations of electronic assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信