1982-2001年美国交通系统绩效评估

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ECONOMICS
B. Sloboda
{"title":"1982-2001年美国交通系统绩效评估","authors":"B. Sloboda","doi":"10.1400/91929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Progressive total factor productivity changes of U.S. transit systems are examined in this paper using non-parametric frontier techniques. Farrell's measure or single period efficiency measures for 1982-2001 were applied to the first part of the analysis. Then the panel data had the Malmquist productivity index applied to it, and, for the period 1982 to 2001 for transit systems, the total factor productivity growth was partitioned into technical efficiency change and technological progress. There can be further partitioning of the efficiency measure into scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency, as the analysis gives, since there is application of variable return to scale. That analysis results revealed that transit system average loss was .10 percent for the sample, with the decline attributed to efficiency, was available through empirical results applying the Malmquist productivity index.","PeriodicalId":44910,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Economics","volume":"53 1","pages":"1000-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Measurement of U.S. Transit Systems, 1982-2001\",\"authors\":\"B. Sloboda\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/91929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Progressive total factor productivity changes of U.S. transit systems are examined in this paper using non-parametric frontier techniques. Farrell's measure or single period efficiency measures for 1982-2001 were applied to the first part of the analysis. Then the panel data had the Malmquist productivity index applied to it, and, for the period 1982 to 2001 for transit systems, the total factor productivity growth was partitioned into technical efficiency change and technological progress. There can be further partitioning of the efficiency measure into scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency, as the analysis gives, since there is application of variable return to scale. That analysis results revealed that transit system average loss was .10 percent for the sample, with the decline attributed to efficiency, was available through empirical results applying the Malmquist productivity index.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"1000-1016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/91929\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/91929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文采用非参数前沿技术研究了美国交通系统全要素生产率的递进变化。法雷尔的措施或1982-2001年的单期效率措施应用于分析的第一部分。然后将面板数据应用Malmquist生产率指数,并将1982年至2001年期间运输系统的全要素生产率增长划分为技术效率变化和技术进步。正如分析所给出的那样,由于存在对规模的可变回报的应用,因此可以将效率度量进一步划分为规模效率和纯技术效率。分析结果显示,该样本的交通系统平均损失为0.10%,其下降归因于效率,可通过应用Malmquist生产率指数的实证结果获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Measurement of U.S. Transit Systems, 1982-2001
Progressive total factor productivity changes of U.S. transit systems are examined in this paper using non-parametric frontier techniques. Farrell's measure or single period efficiency measures for 1982-2001 were applied to the first part of the analysis. Then the panel data had the Malmquist productivity index applied to it, and, for the period 1982 to 2001 for transit systems, the total factor productivity growth was partitioned into technical efficiency change and technological progress. There can be further partitioning of the efficiency measure into scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency, as the analysis gives, since there is application of variable return to scale. That analysis results revealed that transit system average loss was .10 percent for the sample, with the decline attributed to efficiency, was available through empirical results applying the Malmquist productivity index.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信